Good news - it actually turned out thanks to camera capabilities, Bad news - I need a longer lensCamera? Lens? Settings? Editing? Nice photo.....
Good news - it actually turned out thanks to camera capabilities, Bad news - I need a longer lens
The longest lens I have is a 70-200. Using manual setting was able to make adjustment to balance black background vs bright subject to see moon detail through the viewfinder on a mirrorless camera so knew exposure was correct. Then radical cropping in post which the camera's sensor supported.
Sony a7rIII, 200mm, iso 640, f8 1/2000. Original RAW file 7952x5304 40.8 MB, cropped finished jpg 1932x1289 284 Kb. I didn't have to reduce it further for web posting as I typically will drop them to 2000px anyway as the regular full size jpg is way to large to upload/post or more than 2 full size files as an email attachment would be rejected.
On my short list is the 200-600 (or 100-400 + 1.4x or 2x extender), but waiting to see what Tamron or Sigma introduce in that range that doesn't require an adapter but is native mount. The nice thing about the 100-400, besides being smaller, is the internal focusing rather than the lens extended focusing/breathing. If Tamron or Sigma did internal on a ?-600, I would be all over it. They have until Christmas, then they make my decision if they introduce nothing.
Yeah, you're right - I got them switched. It is the 200-600 that has the internal focus. I have used the Tamron 150-600 which didn't and was a pain if you didn't lock it to avoid the zoom creep when walking.I have the 200-600 and love it, but yes, it's a bit heavy and awkward to carry around! I haven't used it to shoot the moon yet, though, as I still need to get a Wimberley gimbal for the tripod. My next lens is probably going to be the 100-400mm, which will be nice to use at times when I don't want to fool with a tripod, as the 100-400 is indeed a bit lighter and smaller. The 200-600mm has internal focusing, which is great since that lens is already so long that if it zoomed and extended even further, that would be very cumbersome! I thought the 100-400 lens does extend when zoomed?? Or maybe I'm thinking of a different lens, as I've been looking at reviews and such for several, so it is easy to get confused about which does what and has specific features!
Ah, a nice cycle path! One way, I hope.Part of the series over past few days. Most of the trail was nice with leaves covering a tight path, but then there was this...
View attachment 905149
Yeah, you're right - I got them switched. It is the 200-600 that has the internal focus. I have used the Tamron 150-600 which didn't and was a pain if you didn't lock it to avoid the zoom creep when walking.
Nothing wrong with a good lilac photo. I find they are rather good subjects with the variability in color. Mine are about to bloom, and we have 2 hard freezes forecasted. I hope they and my Japanese maple endure the snap.
Makes me think of Schindler’s list for some reason. I beg that same scene looks very different today!