Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

StrollerEd

macrumors 6502a
Aug 13, 2011
995
6,938
Scotland
Excursion into wildlife photography continues ..
1612269922047.jpeg
 

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,065
50,748
Nice :)
I haven't really tried the x10 macro lens yet (I assume that's what you used for this shot), as it's difficult enough to get focus with the x4 ;)

Cheers :)

Hugh
Do you mean the macro filters? Although I don’t have an x10 one of those. This is with the velvet 56 and stacked 8mm and 11mm extension tubes. Plus the use of a tripod.

ETA Do you mean this?

 
  • Like
Reactions: tizeye and Hughmac

Hughmac

macrumors 603
Feb 4, 2012
6,001
32,566
Kent, UK
Do you mean the macro filters? Although I don’t have an x10 one of those. This is with the velvet 56 and stacked 8mm and 11mm extension tubes. Plus the use of a tripod.

ETA Do you mean this?

Thanks. I should have guessed it wouldn't be so easy. I've just bought the LensBaby macro filters which have +4 and +10 lenses ;)
Edit - I've just seen your link and yes that's the one.

Cheers :)

Hugh
 
  • Like
Reactions: tizeye and mollyc

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,065
50,748
Thanks. I should have guessed it wouldn't be so easy. I've just bought the LensBaby macro filters which have +4 and +10 lenses ;)
Edit - I've just seen your link and yes that's the one.

Cheers :)

Hugh
So I do have some of those but I have +1, +2, and +4. But those only work on the optics and the Sol. They don’t work on the velvets. Which is why I have extension tubes now. ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hughmac

baypharm

macrumors 68000
Nov 15, 2007
1,951
973
Wild Iguna RT 41 Naples Fl feb 1 11AM
I was lucky, and took 50 photos and posted 10 other creatures on that 4 mile walk to the phone store along a highway.
View attachment 1723530 Nikon D500 more on flickr!
Did you kill it after taking its picture? Just asking as they are considered an invasive species in Florida. Haven’t seen one (yet) on my land but unfortunately I did spot a couple of Macaques looking to be around 17 pounds. Spotted them with my binoculars on a recent overnight hike. Very bad monkeys, sharp daggers and claws, and a Herpes B carrier. For now, their numbers (apparently) are sufficiently small enough to where they are afraid of us. As their population increases - that could change. Currently we can peacefully co-habitat together. I won‘t bother them as long as they don’t begin making moves to attack. Still, the thought of hundreds of monkeys flying through the trees is unsettling; as I spend a lot of time hiking and camping overnight. Hopefully, the bobcats will keep their numbers down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: r.harris1

Clix Pix

macrumors Core
So I do have some of those but I have +1, +2, and +4. But those only work on the optics and the Sol. They don’t work on the velvets. Which is why I have extension tubes now. ?
When I got my Sol 45 from Amazon, the trio of +1, +2 and +4 close-up filters came with it, and one of the first things I did was to order a step-down ring in order to also use this trio on my Sony 50mm f/2.8 macro lens if I had the urge, and they work well with it when I want to experiment with getting really, really deep-in and super-close to my subject. I've only tried this a couple of times so far, though. I have larger close-up filters that work with my other normal and macro lenses but didn't have any that worked with the fairly small filter size of the 50mm f/2.8. Used extension tubes in the past, though, with it. Fun to have the flexibility and choice!

Yes, extension tubes work really well, too, for this sort of thing, and the advantage is that there is no need to worry about filter size on a given lens; the extension tubes mount on the camera body and then any lens one chooses mounts on them (either individually or stacked). This can be a great way of getting in closer to a subject with a lens which is not a macro lens and which does not have a particularly close focusing distance -- both this and the technique of using close-up filters are often referred to as the "poor man's macro lens," so to speak. Either does fairly well but is not really a true substitute for an actual macro lens. When you do use one of these strategies in combination with an actual macro lens, too, though, this can produce fascinating results! Once just for the heck of it a long time ago I experimented with both close-up filters and extension tubes -- let's just say that this was a bit extreme and as for DOF....WHAT DOF??! LOL! It was fun playing with the idea, though! One technique or the other works fine, but together......well, a bit OTT. It is great that we have these various options for exploring our creativity and seeing what happens when we do thus-and-so.....
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.