Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Photography IX
- Thread starter Mudbug
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
- Status
idkew said:Anyone interested in seeing some shots I took of my eggs as they are being hard boiled? Actually came out kinda cool. Good way to spend the downtime of food being made.
oh- I am in on the disposable. BUT- i think we need to define the camera better. I have used expensive and inexpensive disposable cameras, there is a large difference between the two.
Well, what type of camera should we use then? And sure, show the eggs, why not?
zync said:
How about the general use Kodak 35 Funsaver... according to the kodak page its almost 80% recyclable...
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=2/3/9/1026/1050&pq-locale=en_US
cr2sh said:How about the general use Kodak 35 Funsaver... according to the kodak page its almost 80% recyclable...
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=2/3/9/1026/1050&pq-locale=en_US
Sounds good to me, if that's what we decide, I'll pick one up from work tomorrow...
I'm glad to see the disposable camera comp kicking off.
I set up a quick site: http://www.wardofsky.com/dispose if we do go ahead.
In terms of cameras I liked the Agfa Le Box http://www.agfa.com/photo/products/fwl/
You can reload it yourself if you know how...
I set up a quick site: http://www.wardofsky.com/dispose if we do go ahead.
In terms of cameras I liked the Agfa Le Box http://www.agfa.com/photo/products/fwl/
You can reload it yourself if you know how...
Wardofsky said:
I missed the reply email
Oh well, I'll get whatever we decide tomorrow...I'll probably end up working on Sunday anyway so I'll have a chance to get it then...I say we go with something kodak or fuji....fuji makes great films and kodak is usually ok....they're both fairly good....I'd probably prefer fuji, but this doesn't really matter all that much, so whatever....
I don't mind the Kodak Funsaver 35, but whatever....you guys decide
I need some sleep, it's 4:14 AM here...but hey, I've only been up since 5:23 PM 
Disposables? They're too good.
I'd like to see how you all do with one of these:
http://members.aol.com/Chuck02178/27.htm
I started photography on a camera like the one on the left. It uses 620 black and white roll film and produces 2.25 inch prints--I think the negative is 2 inches. I suppose it's not too bad if you've dealt with a medium format camera but the viewfinder gives you the image at the top of the camera and the image is upside down.
Needless to say, I don't use it anymore.
I'd like to see how you all do with one of these:
http://members.aol.com/Chuck02178/27.htm
I started photography on a camera like the one on the left. It uses 620 black and white roll film and produces 2.25 inch prints--I think the negative is 2 inches. I suppose it's not too bad if you've dealt with a medium format camera but the viewfinder gives you the image at the top of the camera and the image is upside down.
Needless to say, I don't use it anymore.
Wardofsky said:
thanks.
idkew- that water picture of yours is dope.
****
the disposable idea is fresh. let's do it. just let me know what camera to buy.
peace.
ok, someone make a decision. what camera? what film? i got all next week to work on it, (helps being an unemployed bum)
and- to continue my dinner theme. last night i grilled shrimp on the barbi. (sp?)
the attachment is charcoal starting. it is more than one pict. most heavily photoshopped pict i have posted. (but less than a neut pict )
just shows how we each have our thing.
and- to continue my dinner theme. last night i grilled shrimp on the barbi. (sp?)
the attachment is charcoal starting. it is more than one pict. most heavily photoshopped pict i have posted. (but less than a neut pict
)just shows how we each have our thing.
Attachments
idkew said:ok, someone make a decision. what camera? what film? i got all next week to work on it, (helps being an unemployed bum)
and- to continue my dinner theme. last night i grilled shrimp on the barbi. (sp?)
...
the attachment is charcoal starting.
just shows how we each have our thing.
The fire is strangely beautiful thought it made me think briefly of repenting.
JDar said:The fire is strangely beautiful thought it made me think briefly of repenting.
but think of the Grills and BBQs that must be down there....
most heavily Photoshopped picture, another
This was an attempt to simulate levitation. It wound up looking like a messy plant.
idkew said:ok, someone make a decision. what camera? what film? i got all next week to work on it, (helps being an unemployed bum)
and- to continue my dinner theme. last night i grilled shrimp on the barbi. (sp?)
the attachment is charcoal starting. it is more than one pict. most heavily photoshopped pict i have posted. (but less than a neut pict
just shows how we each have our thing.
This was an attempt to simulate levitation. It wound up looking like a messy plant.
Attachments
erm, hi first post here after lurking around for a few weeks
hope I got the attachment working and everything
this pic was taken with a 35mm slr, with 400 iso film, bumped up to 3200 (camera won't actually go that high, had to work out sutter speeds myself) then the negitive was contact printed and scanned (the scratches and dust are from the scanner glass) then messed about with in photoshop to up the contrast and emphasize the scratches, and then tinted blue, just 'cause it looks cooler that way
first post here after lurking around for a few weekshope I got the attachment working and everything
this pic was taken with a 35mm slr, with 400 iso film, bumped up to 3200 (camera won't actually go that high, had to work out sutter speeds myself) then the negitive was contact printed and scanned (the scratches and dust are from the scanner glass) then messed about with in photoshop to up the contrast and emphasize the scratches, and then tinted blue, just 'cause it looks cooler that way
Attachments
MatMistake said:erm, hi
hope I got the attachment working and everything
Welcome, MatMistake!
That is a neat picture--there are dynamic things going on in it, made dramatic by the techniques you used. That could be used for a thematic appreciation test by a shrink. "And what do you think of this picture?"
MatMistake said:erm, hi
hope I got the attachment working and everything
this pic was taken with a 35mm slr, with 400 iso film, bumped up to 3200 (camera won't actually go that high, had to work out sutter speeds myself) then the negitive was contact printed and scanned (the scratches and dust are from the scanner glass) then messed about with in photoshop to up the contrast and emphasize the scratches, and then tinted blue, just 'cause it looks cooler that way
very nice. i like the technique.
i loved to dirty my images when i was in B&W class. i was terrible at developing (klutz) so i made a style of it.
i'll have to post my current pics in the morning; remote ftp is still down for some reason... i can't wait for wireless to move in here at home (1.5 mbps up and down for $40/month).
peace.
Here are my pics: http://www.emyprinter.com/mypics.html
Oh, and here's one i forgot to put up there;
opinions are appreciated!
Oh, and here's one i forgot to put up there;
opinions are appreciated!
Attachments
- Status