Hi, I'm no designer, but if you want to keep it simple why make the 'J' blue and highlighted? For a simple design it should just be one type face, one size, one color - so it's simple.
Unless the 'J' is important, to me it looks like a driving school style logo where they deliberately make the 'L' stand out so you know its a driving school.
Hi, I'm no designer, but if you want to keep it simple why make the 'J' blue and highlighted? For a simple design it should just be one type face, one size, one color - so it's simple.
Unless the 'J' is important, to me it looks like a driving school style logo where they deliberately make the 'L' stand out so you know its a driving school.
Sorry, that's not a logo. It's white type on a black rectangle... with a strange italic blue colored J that has no meaning. Can't suggest a fix for something that's not there to begin with. Maybe "hire a designer" is the best advice I can give you at this point.
A wordmark is a standardized graphic representation of the name of a company, institution, or product name used for purposes of identification and branding. A wordmark is usually a distinct text-only typographic treatment as can be found in the graphic identities of FedEx, Google, and Wikipedia. The organization name is incorporated as a simple graphic treatment to create a clear, visually memorable identity. The representation of the word becomes a visual symbol of the organization or product.
This website has compiled 50 Creative & Stunning Wordmark Logos. Hope it can give you some inspiration for your site logo.
http://thedesigninspiration.com/articles/50-creative-stunning-wordmark-logos/
I agree with the others and think you should start again and this time be sure to only use b&w until you have it set, then you can play with colour.
not diggin the 2 diff fonts to be honest, to much clash. and the J, id just leave blue, and not slant it.
It would be helpful if you heeded it....
Your advice is not helpful at all. ...
It would be helpful if you heeded it.
He doesn't really want advice. He certainly doesn't know how to take it. His pseudo "logo" is crap but he doesn't know how to take the criticism for his own good. He doesn't seem to realize that the mark he winds up with is a direct reflection of his brand or how he wants to be perceived by his target audience. The message I'm getting with the way it is now says non-professional.
My advice to you is to make the tone and intent of your postings less abrasive. How often are people posting on this forum offended by your "criticism" of their work? Consider this not being down to them being too sensitive but to whatever it is that motivates you to put your opinion across in the least tactful manner you can muster.
David J Early, how about doing something like this with the J?
...I don't think the J needs to have significants as others say.
Sorry, that's not a logo. It's white type on a black rectangle... with a strange italic blue colored J that has no meaning. Can't suggest a fix for something that's not there to begin with. Maybe "hire a designer" is the best advice I can give you at this point.
No, it's art.
In other words, art isn't merely expressive, it is also deliberative and purposeful.
My retort was at least partially tongue-in-cheek; but I totally disagree that art must have a planned logic.
does everybody call you "Jay"? if you don't go by that name, then emphasizing the "J" seems like the wrong thing to do
Hi,
I'm looking for some feedback/suggestions for the typographical logo I created for a photography website.
The key thing for me was simplicity, and that is what I am trying to retain.
Thanks in advance.
David