Bottom line - Don't believe EVERYTHING you read on the Internet.
- half an inch
- half an inch
- half an inch
- half an inch
Is that really the most important factor to you? LOL, only because you listed in four times.
Might I ask why it's so important? Even Dell Adamo XPS is thinner than .5" and 10mm thick. If Apple cannot win thin, is it really that important?
Are you willing to give up performance and battery life to achieve that? How about display, would you be willing to go down to a 10" display? Would you give up aluminum and go with carbon fiber to both narrow and thin by miniaturizing the whole MBA?
Would a .5" MBA be powerful enough to be a MacBook first and an ultraportable second like it currently is?
I cannot say I care about .5" thickness as much as I care about weight. I feel the MBA is perfect now, but thinner and less weight could be great!
I hope we all get exactly what we want... a Core i7 CPU, ATI dedicated graphics (1GB Memory), 8 GB RAM, 10-hour battery, OLED HD 1600x900 display, glass trackpad, 256GB Intel SSD using a SATA-III connector (no more LIF), BluRay External drive option, better speakers, digital output, USB 3 x 4 ports, LightPeak, FireWire 3200, mDP, eSata (and all ports hide within a tray that closes), that runs at 10 degrees celsius, that has a top case made from black aluminum and bottom of carbon fiber. It could provide cooling for our legs during the Summer months. I am sure that isn't going to happen, but wouldn't it be great? All for a price of $499 to compete with the iPad? Okay, how about $1499?
- half an inch
- half an inch
- half an inch
- half an inch
agreed and I'd happily throw 5k down for it and feel like I ripped off apple!
LMAO, I have said that I would dump $5k for the ultimate MBA and people criticized me... but I am with you. I want the options to get as much as I want from my MBA. I really don't get why Apple isn't taking advantage of us MBA buyers who would gladly pay more?
Apple used to focus on incremental BTO options to increase its margin and revenues... I don't get why we don't have that with the MBA. Two options with HDD or SSD and a slight CPU difference. I would guess that the target MBA market buyers are willing to pay more than the target MBP market. It's the MBAs that Apple dumped that are being used for secondary computing. Of course Apple realizes that.
Many have said the iPad will eliminate the need for the MBA. I think exactly opposite, as the iPad will ensure Apple focuses the MBA as being a primary Mac capable computer. The MBA should get more capabilities with its next update with options for us to spend more of our money, as there's no longer a need for Apple to keep the price down as a secondary Mac substitute. However, for those who don't want an iPad or do want full Internet (including Flash) the MBA will still be available and that's why a range of prices with many BTO upgrade options would do best in my opinion. The iPad has saved the MBA from going cheaper and less powerful. It ensures the primary focus will be on those of us wanting to use our MBA as our primary Mac.
1. glass trackpad
2. 4GB DDR3 RAM, 64GB SSD - standard
3. 1.83 C2D @ 1200$, 2.0 C2D @ 1500$
4. And, with all Macs, the Remote should be included again.
How about Light Peak? Some think that's closer than we think. It could be a port used by everything from a card reader to HD displays.