Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
(Poll) Fast PC vs. Fast Mac
- Thread starter PowerPCFan
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well, the fastest PC would stomp the Mac Pro. It would also be more useful for me. As most of what I do now is in Windows. I still use a Mac laptop. For those times I need a laptop. The Macbook does what I need. But a Mac doesn't cover my desktop needs.
The PC would be faster, but I love Apple so much that I'd go with Mac Pro even if PC is way faster.
I do not love Apple that much. My time with Apple started in 2001, but based on their current trend towards locking things down and making things difficult to repair I don't see myself with Apple in the future.
I voted PC because that's going to have the longest support. And getting Linux on a PC is easier than trying to get it on Mac.
Love for a brand is cold comfort when the brand cuts you off and all your workarounds begin to fail.
So far 9 voters, and its been 66.7% for Mac the whole time.
UPDATE: 15 votes, Mac Pro still wins! I wonder what would happen if I post the same poll on a PC forum.
Update 2: 22 votes, Mac pro still wins with about 60%!
UPDATE: 15 votes, Mac Pro still wins! I wonder what would happen if I post the same poll on a PC forum.
Update 2: 22 votes, Mac pro still wins with about 60%!
Last edited:
@eyoungren I agree that PC might have longer support and faster, but just like my earlier post said, I'll always be a Mac guy.
I have only been a Mac user, and I will NEVER fully switch to a PC, but I just had to vote for the PC... it's so much faster than the fastest Mac.
There has only been a brief stretch, half decade or so, when I didn’t own at least one PC in addition to a Mac. Several times I strongly considered the switch, including a Hackintosh. However, there’s always the eventual (nearly routine) reminder while using Windows, when the experience is a frustrating mess. It’s at that moment I think “This is why I can never use a Windows PC as my main computer” — that is, majority of personal data and routine tasks.
In other words, I do like the customization/variety and cost value in “PC” components (for those of us willing to assemble their own system). But the software is adequate at best. Indeed, macOS is not perfect. Although, in my experience, it’s far more reliable and intuitive than Windows.
In other words, I do like the customization/variety and cost value in “PC” components (for those of us willing to assemble their own system). But the software is adequate at best. Indeed, macOS is not perfect. Although, in my experience, it’s far more reliable and intuitive than Windows.
Simple… if I really need the power then it’s a clear choice. I’d happily take that Nvidia DGX station over any Mac, because it runs circles at the speed of light around any Mac out there. I could then still pop $10k or so on any Mac and be much, much better off than the other way around.
I agree. Apple Silicon MacPro would be insane, maybe even faster than fastest pc because it runs so cool and fast. I think you're right that if you need the speed (like for making Star Wars in a recording studio) get a PC but if you want a mac and you need the power, get an intel mac pro. If I had waited for an M2 Mac Pro, i think it would have been Best Mac Pro 99.1% and Fastest PC 0.9%.Fastest PC vs. most expensive Intel Mac Pro? PC.
Fastest PC vs. most expensive yet-to-be-unveiled Apple Silicon Mac Pro? Hard to say, but my gut is saying Mac Pro.
Bad time to ask this question, IMO. Good question, but bad timing.
You're missing a "none of the above" option. If you are picking "any computer in the world" just for bragging rights, with cost and practicality no object, then here's your shortlist:
TOP500 - Wikipedia
Spoiler: the Mac Pro doesn't appear on the top 10 (if at all) and although x86 is widespread they're not what you'd really call PCs. OS-wise it's pretty much a Linux closed shop.
Of course, I'd have no possible use for such a system, although "donating" the runtime to something like folding@home would give me a nice warm feeling... wait... no, that's the air conditioning overloading again!
If you want a sensible answer to the dichotomy as posed then it all depends on what you want to do with it. Right now I have a couple of perfectly good Macs but I don't really have a decent gaming system, so I'd take the PC.
Some of the answers confuse me. The question wasn't "Which would be faster?" It was "which would you own?" - THE fastest Mac Pro is still going to be phenomenally fast. Even if a PC could be faster, how much is that speed actually needed?
And even with all that speed, Windows would still have the various aspects that slow you down and cause frustrations.
And even with all that speed, Windows would still have the various aspects that slow you down and cause frustrations.
I really don't have an interest in having the fastest computer in the world or the fastest Mac. I have no need for that.
I have an M1 Macbook air which satisfies my everyday needs and a watercooled Alienware with a Ryzen processor for playing games (which isn't really for me to be honest).
I wouldn't buy a mac for playing games so really you need to think about what you want to use it for rather than just having the fastest.
I have an M1 Macbook air which satisfies my everyday needs and a watercooled Alienware with a Ryzen processor for playing games (which isn't really for me to be honest).
I wouldn't buy a mac for playing games so really you need to think about what you want to use it for rather than just having the fastest.
I agree, all the power I need is the power of an M1 Pro chip or Intel i7 or i9 at most. Just thought it would be a fun question to ask. Even this 2015 iMac I am using is fast enough for everything I do (iMovie, GarageBand, Pretty basic internet tasks) I sometimes wish I had a little bit more power but this 7-year-old Intel chip is still working very well.
I love macOS. Tried Windows in a VM once and didn't even know how to navigate the OS! Windows is a big complicated mess, whereas macOS is a clean-looking easy to use masterpiece.
As I read the replies I thought the same thing. I never said which one would be faster, which would most likely be PC. The question was "which would you own if you need a lot of speed" and it was based off of if you are a PC or Mac person but some people misinterpreted it as "which is faster, I need the fastest computer ever."
Thanks for the list. It was very cool, but the question wasn't "any computer in the world", it was Most Expensive Mac Pro vs Fastest PC, and it definitely wasn't Most Expensive Mac Pro vs Fastest PC vs the 591,872 core Frontier HPE Cray EX235a.You're missing a "none of the above" option. If you are picking "any computer in the world" just for bragging rights, with cost and practicality no object, then here's your shortlist:
TOP500 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Spoiler: the Mac Pro doesn't appear on the top 10 (if at all) and although x86 is widespread they're not what you'd really call PCs. OS-wise it's pretty much a Linux closed shop.
Of course, I'd have no possible use for such a system, although "donating" the runtime to something like folding@home would give me a nice warm feeling... wait... no, that's the air conditioning overloading again!
If you want a sensible answer to the dichotomy as posed then it all depends on what you want to do with it. Right now I have a couple of perfectly good Macs but I don't really have a decent gaming system, so I'd take the PC.
The question literally started "If you could have any computer in the world".
"If you could have any food in the world for dinner, would you choose spam or boiled cabbage?"
Heh, yeah. Always happens - I’ve been publishing articles to Medium lately and some of the replies astound me, with people getting annoyed with me for things I didn’t even say!
Anyway for me it would be Mac. If I had the unlimited budget, I’d have a Mac Pro at home (because why not?) and a fully maxed out 16” MBP and a maxed out iPad Pro. Zero risk of them being too slow for me!
That must have been a mistake. I did say any computer in the world but I then listed only two options to choose from, so even if I say any computer, you still have to pick from the options I listed.
I'd love to have a Mac Pro, it's just so much money and I don't need the power.