This will happen when they can shrink the cameras enough so they can fit in the bezels.I don’t mind the notch and I wish Apple would bring something like this to the iPhone.
This will happen when they can shrink the cameras enough so they can fit in the bezels.I don’t mind the notch and I wish Apple would bring something like this to the iPhone.
I wouldn’t call this fuss. People just have different preferences and opinions about aesthetics, and this is a poll to see what they are.Not bothered by the notch, you don’t even see if when using the phone, don’t know what all the fuss is about.
Notch, no notch, half a notch, doesn’t bother me, as long as Face ID is here to stay, I’m happy 😁
yepId go for true full screen with touch ID
only cause I don't take selfies hehe![]()
I think I know what you were trying to ask - even after your edit, but it still comes down to whether people are ok with touchID. The basis of your question is whether you would give up Face ID for a full screen display (When one option doesn’t have FaceID, that becomes the issue). You change two variables under that one option. Whether people are ok with those other options aesthetically really seems trivial.Seriously? Precisely so people would NOT think this is a “choose between Face ID or Touch ID” poll, “except if absolutely necessary (to get true full screen)”.
I swear people get so “triggered” every time their precious Face/Touch ID is even mentioned and they bring years of baggage from previous arguments into it. I’m starting to regret this poll.
I think it’s pretty simple. This poll is based on the premise of a true full screen being the goal and asking the question—“what do you think is the best compromise to try to get to that goal?”—whether it’s a notch, hole punch, bezel, or giving up Face ID entirely (now that it’s more of a feasible option). The catalyst for this poll is recent rumors of Apple adopting hole punch, and Touch ID now being able to achieve full screen either via power button or presumably under screen (and this is kind of taking a lone front camera out of the equation, assuming it can be put under screen even though that tech is pretty immature). But some people are so stuck on the Face ID vs Touch ID fight, that they think that the existence of even one option without Face ID means this is just another pointless Face ID vs Touch ID thread. It’s ONE compromise option that some might prefer, that is all. You don’t want to give up Face ID, ok good, now pick which of the three Face ID implementations you think is best, and now argue why that’s the best. But people just end it with Touch ID sucks. ??I think I know what you were trying to ask - even after your edit, but it still comes down to whether people are ok with touchID. The basis of your question is whether you would give up Face ID for a full screen display (When one option doesn’t have FaceID, that becomes the issue). You change two variables under that one option. Whether people are ok with those other options aesthetically really seems trivial.
Someone suggested a tiny hole punch for each Face ID sensor, but since the notch is rumored to be shrinking, I imagine it might also be possible and more preferable if they could cram the entire array into one larger but not too big hole punch.The hole punch idea still doesn’t make sense despite the rumors. I can’t quite see a front facing camera in a hole-punch but having faceID under screen. I could be wrong. I just don’t believe those rumors yet. No other company has that level faceID tech under screen. So that option doesn’t make sense if, as you said, we are talking current tech.
The only difference would be in landscape I don’t think a wallpaper with black ears can rotate to keep the ears black (I could be wrong), but more importantly a Home Screen wallpaper wouldn’t help for apps which is where people spend the majority of their time.The option you lay out for “bezel” isn’t really interesting imho - even though some people picked it - because you can do that right now, At least on the home screens with proper wallpaper.
Of course, people are welcome to discuss the merits/demerits of each option. But that’s not what’s happening with some people here. Some are trying to devolve it into simply Face ID (with 3 options that I’m not even going to acknowledge) vs Touch ID. That has been done to death over and over and over, and that’s not what this is.…Which would be an interesting question to get an answer to, but you’d be crazy to think people won’t discuss their love or hate for each ID method.
Reading through this tbread, you’re the one getting triggered by peoples opinion. You asked people to answer a poll with loaded answers and expect no opinions. Seems strange to me.I think it’s pretty simple. This poll is based on the premise of a true full screen being the goal and asking the question—“what do you think is the best compromise to try to get to that goal?”—whether it’s a notch, hole punch, bezel, or giving up Face ID entirely (now that it’s more of a feasible option). The catalyst for this poll is recent rumors of Apple adopting hole punch, and Touch ID now being able to achieve full screen either via power button or presumably under screen (and this is kind of taking a lone front camera out of the equation, assuming it can be put under screen even though that tech is pretty immature). But some people are so stuck on the Face ID vs Touch ID fight, that they think that the existence of even one option without Face ID means this is just another pointless Face ID vs Touch ID thread. It’s ONE compromise option that some might prefer, that is all. You don’t want to give up Face ID, ok good, now pick which of the three Face ID implementations you think is best, and now argue why that’s the best. But people just end it with Touch ID sucks. ??
And then there are some (not all) “notch is a non issue” people here who seem to be saying that even discussing the options or having this poll is an invalid idea. I honestly don’t know where they’re coming from.
Someone suggested a tiny hole punch for each Face ID sensor, but since the notch is rumored to be shrinking, I imagine it might also be possible and more preferable if they could cram the entire array into one larger but not too big hole punch.
The only difference would be in landscape I don’t think a wallpaper with black ears can rotate to keep the ears black (I could be wrong), but more importantly a Home Screen wallpaper wouldn’t help for apps which is where people spend the majority of their time.
Of course, people are welcome to discuss the merits/demerits of each option. But that’s not what’s happening with some people here. Some are trying to devolve it into simply Face ID (with 3 options that I’m not even going to acknowledge) vs Touch ID. That has been done to death over and over and over, and that’s not what this is.
It’s like you completely ignored everything I said. 🤷♂️Reading through this tbread, you’re the one getting triggered by peoples opinion. You asked people to answer a poll with loaded answers and expect no opinions. Seems strange to me.