Nice to see though that you've evolved from using '***hole' to 'arsehole' in the short time you've been here. Well done – we'll have you talking proper in no time.I was not pleased about replacing the arsehole HD.
Nice to see though that you've evolved from using '***hole' to 'arsehole' in the short time you've been here. Well done – we'll have you talking proper in no time.I was not pleased about replacing the arsehole HD.
All Mac Pros look the same pretty much, yea. But not all Macs look the same. Take, for example, another Mac of mine:
A Mac Plus. Rather different looking, don't you think?
blakespot
Wow... at first I never believed that story of how Steve Jobs was especially anal about the layout of the chips on the original Mac's motherboards (they had to be arranged "pretty", otherwise he would not be satisfied). But after looking at that picture, I don't doubt it one bit.
Here's the inside of a similar-era computer: an Atari 520ST, powered by an 8MHz 68000. (Actually, 0.2MHz faster than the Mac's.)Wow... at first I never believed that story of how Steve Jobs was especially anal about the layout of the chips on the original Mac's motherboards (they had to be arranged "pretty", otherwise he would not be satisfied). But after looking at that picture, I don't doubt it one bit.
Wow... at first I never believed that story of how Steve Jobs was especially anal about the layout of the chips on the original Mac's motherboards (they had to be arranged "pretty", otherwise he would not be satisfied). But after looking at that picture, I don't doubt it one bit.
actually it was only because the other (and more familiar) alternative would have been censored. not that I don't enjoy stealing phrases and such.Nice to see though that you've evolved from using '***hole' to 'arsehole' in the short time you've been here. Well done we'll have you talking proper in no time.
shecky said:i opened mine up and found this
what is that? PowerPC?
In other words, PowerPC?Apparently it's actually one of the old motorola processors