looks like WH-1000XM3s
Yeah, great choice for the use case (wireless, ANC, portable while having excellent SQ and comfort).
looks like WH-1000XM3s
looks like WH-1000XM3s
Based on the video title, Zeos approves. I haven't watched it yet, but I will in a little bit. Do enjoy them!Thats correct.
Took my first flight with them and they are phenomenal!
Alrighty then, here are my thoughts and experience with the BLON B20 open-back planar magnetic headphones. I’ll start with the conclusion and get that out of the way now: they’re great, love them.The BLON B20's arrived a few minutes ago. They came precisely on the day Drop said they'd be delivered. I thought a week or so ago when they landed in Kentucky that I'd get them sooner, but nope.
Anyway, I connected the balanced cable to them foregoing the single-ended one it comes with. I switched the Jotunheim from high gain to low gain and turned the knob down before starting the music. These are easy to drive 32-ohm headphones and previously I was using the harder to drive Sennheiser's and Beyerdynamics which benefited from high gain. If I wanted to, I can push the Jotunheim to ram a full 5 watts per channel into my ears and make them bleed, but I don't want to go that far!
I'm going to being listening to them for several days before I post my review and thoughts about them.
Anyone care to hazard a guess as to what I chose to play on these first?
View attachment 878264
If you have one already, a DAC that is, I'd recommend using it and an amp.So going to listen to them this weekend. Wondering if I will need a small DAC for these, with my Mac Mini.
HOLY CRAP!!If you have one already, a DAC that is, I'd recommend using it and an amp.
In my experience, when I added just an amp to my Mac mini, it improved the sound nicely with just some power behind it. But then I later added the DAC to the mix and holy ****, that was a drastic improvement in sound quality all around. It was way better than the DAC that Apple and other PC manufacturers put on their mainboards.
Also, in case you don't already know this and if you do, forgive me for saying so, but don't judge your new cans sound right away. They need some burn-in or break-in period before they really sound good like they should. Something like 20 to 50 hours of use are what times I see thrown around for that.
I know when I recently got my BLON B20 planars from Drop, that it took about that long for me to get through the burn-in and really get the best sound from them. At first, I was like these don't sound that great, but I let them burn in and now I really love them.
Ahhh... looks like another person about to fall down the hi-fi rabbit hole!HOLY CRAP!!
I ordered a very inexpensive amp from Amazon, just to try it out...
WOW!
Originally just using the headphones from the Mini, the headphones seemed 'soft', like the artificial cap on some Bose headphones.
NOW, I'm getting the sound I expected. I'm curious what a DAC will do now.
HOLY CRAP!!
I ordered a very inexpensive amp from Amazon, just to try it out...
WOW!
Originally just using the headphones from the Mini, the headphones seemed 'soft', like the artificial cap on some Bose headphones.
NOW, I'm getting the sound I expected. I'm curious what a DAC will do now.
Just to throw this out there. I remember hearing that new 'remastered' CD's had artificially filled out sound. So I found a new remastered CD for one that I had purchased in the 90's. I ripped the two CDs and ran the audio files through a program that showed the waveform of the tracks. I was able to compare the tracks, one to another, and was surprised at the differences. The 'remastered' tracks were 'fuller', having the sound 'fattened'. I couldn't really tell much of a difference, but I was using a MacBook Pro and Apple wired ear pods. But I'm a firm believer in the idea that remastered music is an abomination. It's crazy. 'Fatten' the sound and call it better? Sad...
It might work for some music, but...
Oh, headphones? I have an old pair of Bose QC somethings. (The ones that the ear phone pivot kept breaking) They still work. I was lectured on a plane ride about how the iPod 'ruined' music, and that Bose sucked. HAH! I hate flying, so I take a Xanax, and a couple of glasses of wine before boarding. I use the QC's and the iPod to drown out the kids crying, and people trying to lecture me on my audio preferences. A plane is NOT the place to be wearing your $1,000 special cans. It's an aluminum, or carbon fiber, tube, hurtling through the air, with a lot of bored and excitable people. ANYTHING that give me a break from that cacophony is welcome.
But I do remember hearing the nuances of the LP's I had as I grew up. Hearing the occasional conversations and cues from the control room. Good sound is a human right!
hahaha.. I was laughing my ass off at Zeos' review and rant on Apple's iTunes and ALAC format. He's not wrong.
NSFW language:
I'm not sure how many of my CDs are "remastered". Usually it will say on it somewhere. But I do notice that a re-release of an album is often "louder" than the original. Especially if it's a re-release of an album from the 90's or earlier. I can't say I hate the sound of a remastered album but it can sound less dynamic (not sure of the correct word to use). For example I bought the re-release of the Lord of the Rings: Complete Recordings albums. To my ears it sounds great. I did not hear the original releases. I listen mainly at home with my Sennheiser HD6XX (650) on my THX789 amp and Topping D70 DAC. I'm re-ripping my CDs in Apple Lossless. I do wish Apple would support FLAC natively but I doubt that would ever happen.
I was surprised Zeos would even review any Apple as I know he hates Apple products. I will say some of it is justified. I really don't think Apple listens to its users nearly as much as it should. Would be great if Apple supported FLAC natively including in it's iTunes Music Store. I doubt it would ever happen. I would have no issue buying FLAC or even ALAC albums from the iTunes Music Store. I don't care to "rent" my music. I prefer to buy it. Guess I'm old school like that.
Sony WH-1000XM3 and Audio-Technica M50
View attachment 914628
{In terms of audio quality and overall comfort with build construction, highly recommend both units, with the Sony’s at a higher price range with ANC.}
I’ve got the Sony WH-1000XM3 as well. Agree with you on audio quality and comfort. They are awesome on long haul flights.
I've run through 2 Sony gaming headsets because of the same stress fracture that eventually makes the all crack. Sony says to everyone that it's their fault. Now Sony's new gaming headphones are made to remove that flaw, that was everyone's fault.I had a pair of Sony WH-1000xm2s. Their sound quality was superb with great noise cancelling. Unfortunately, my large head caused them to crack. I complained to Sony, opened multiple cases about the headband cracking, and I made zero traction. I finally spoke to the quality control manager and, when they couldn't resolve my problem, I vowed never to buy any more Sony products. Well, the crack got worse and worse, to the point now that the one ear cup broke off completely (held only by the electric cable).
Anyway, with Sony a non-viable option for me, I chose the next best thing: Bose 700. Literally everything outside of the sound profile is night and day better.