Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

gigatoaster

macrumors 68000
Jul 22, 2018
1,651
3,213
France
I bought them last week with some other things. I’m taking it tonight as I have 14h flight!

68AD495F-1F7D-4A24-A2A7-F08A2746E523.jpeg
 

S.B.G

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 8, 2010
26,670
10,447
Detroit
The BLON B20's arrived a few minutes ago. They came precisely on the day Drop said they'd be delivered. I thought a week or so ago when they landed in Kentucky that I'd get them sooner, but nope.

Anyway, I connected the balanced cable to them foregoing the single-ended one it comes with. I switched the Jotunheim from high gain to low gain and turned the knob down before starting the music. These are easy to drive 32-ohm headphones and previously I was using the harder to drive Sennheiser's and Beyerdynamics which benefited from high gain. If I wanted to, I can push the Jotunheim to ram a full 5 watts per channel into my ears and make them bleed, but I don't want to go that far!

I'm going to being listening to them for several days before I post my review and thoughts about them.

Anyone care to hazard a guess as to what I chose to play on these first?

View attachment 878264
Alrighty then, here are my thoughts and experience with the BLON B20 open-back planar magnetic headphones. I’ll start with the conclusion and get that out of the way now: they’re great, love them.

Looking at the physical quality of the build, they’re done very well. They even shipped with the larger and better pads than what MassDrop showed. The larger or rather thicker pads allow for slightly better soundstage and stereo imaging than the less thick pads. Plus they’re also more comfortable to wear.

They’re heavier, significantly heavier than my Sennheiser HD650’s and Beyerdynamic DT880’s. But they’re using more metal and have wood caps where the others are all plastic. But the added weight isn’t noticeable after a minute of wearing them because the over-the-ear pads are comfortable as is the headband. Though, even with these I need to adjust the position of the headband as I do with all headphones I wear. That’s because I don’t have very much hair left on top of my head to provide that much more cushion.

I like how the cables are detachable so I can use my own cables if I want. I’ve been switching between the included single-ended cables and my custom balanced XLR cables to test out different amps and balanced versus single-ended performance.

You can also twist the cans horizontally to lay them flat down on the pads if you want. A nice feature some people enjoy. It’s not one I regularly use since I have stands that hold them for me when not in use.

As for performance, they sound amazing in almost every area. The only fault I find that is very noticeable is that on certain tracks the treble is far too bright and even ear-piercing at times and I have to reduce the volume. I now have a solution for that in that I just picked up the Schiit Loki tone control component. With that it place I played the tracks that hurt again and adjusted the highs down to where it was comfortable to listen to and helped it sound better.

Soundstage is rather good and there are a few tracks that really help put that on display for me. Instruments can appear to come from behind, out in front and off and up to either side and they’re all distinct enough that I can easily pick them out. If you like a lot of detail emerging from your music, you’ll get all the detail you want with these headphones.

Stereo imaging is also very good, and having the thicker pads helps with this as well. You get a broad and tight image from some tracks that are engineered well.

These BLON B20’s are also a little warm in the mid ranges but not too bad. It’s more of a personal preference in how warm or cool one likes their music. The warmth was especially noticeable on R&B tracks I listened to. Again, it’s personal preference there and I didn’t mind the extra warmth.

Bass response is very good and even at the lowest end too. I think they strike a nice balance in this area by giving the listener a decent amount of bass where needed, but not coloring it too much to make them bass heavy like some headphones can be, or are designed to be. It’s also punchy and responsive and less boomy as well which is nice.

I tested these with Schiit audio equipment. I used these with the balanced XLR cables on the Jotunheim and at 32 ohms, the Jotunheim can push a full 5 watts of power to each driver on high gain. If you want to make your ears bleed with power and great sound at the same time, you can do it. I generally used them on the low gain setting.

The other amp I used was the Magni 3 with the single-ended cable which pushed, IIRC, 0.9 watts per side. There was still a huge amount of headroom on the dial, like 75% more to go. At just 25% of the dial they were still fairly loud and if you were in the room with me, you could sing along with the tracks.

The DAC was the same for both amps and that was the Schiit Modi Multibit. I have it as an expansion card in the Jotunheim, and a separate component paired with the Magni 3. All of my tracks are encoded with FLAC ensuring the best possible source I can achieve.

Overall these are amazing cans and I can certainly recommend them to anyone looking for a high-end set of headphones that won’t break the bank.
 

JayMysterio

macrumors 68000
Apr 24, 2010
1,534
32,961
Rock Ridge, California
Awhile ago I stepped a toe into the open back headphone world with some inexpensive Grados. This year I've decided to give Massdrop a try with some Planar headphones.
49470019351_6b8ca85cbf.jpg

Just got them today, so I haven't had a real chance to listen to them yet. Had a little difficulty as when I first ordered them, the shipping address did NOT include my street address. It got all the way to my city, when someone caught it ON the truck, and decided they weren't deliverable. No street address, like I live in Mayberry!! Fortunately since all of that was listed in tracking, Drop was able to see that I didn't try to scam them, and sent another set out rather quickly.

So going to listen to them this weekend. Wondering if I will need a small DAC/Headphone Amplifier for these, with my Mac Mini.
 
Last edited:

S.B.G

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 8, 2010
26,670
10,447
Detroit
So going to listen to them this weekend. Wondering if I will need a small DAC for these, with my Mac Mini.
If you have one already, a DAC that is, I'd recommend using it and an amp.

In my experience, when I added just an amp to my Mac mini, it improved the sound nicely with just some power behind it. But then I later added the DAC to the mix and holy ****, that was a drastic improvement in sound quality all around. It was way better than the DAC that Apple and other PC manufacturers put on their mainboards.

Also, in case you don't already know this and if you do, forgive me for saying so, but don't judge your new cans sound right away. They need some burn-in or break-in period before they really sound good like they should. Something like 20 to 50 hours of use are what times I see thrown around for that.

I know when I recently got my BLON B20 planars from Drop, that it took about that long for me to get through the burn-in and really get the best sound from them. At first, I was like these don't sound that great, but I let them burn in and now I really love them.
 

JayMysterio

macrumors 68000
Apr 24, 2010
1,534
32,961
Rock Ridge, California
If you have one already, a DAC that is, I'd recommend using it and an amp.

In my experience, when I added just an amp to my Mac mini, it improved the sound nicely with just some power behind it. But then I later added the DAC to the mix and holy ****, that was a drastic improvement in sound quality all around. It was way better than the DAC that Apple and other PC manufacturers put on their mainboards.

Also, in case you don't already know this and if you do, forgive me for saying so, but don't judge your new cans sound right away. They need some burn-in or break-in period before they really sound good like they should. Something like 20 to 50 hours of use are what times I see thrown around for that.

I know when I recently got my BLON B20 planars from Drop, that it took about that long for me to get through the burn-in and really get the best sound from them. At first, I was like these don't sound that great, but I let them burn in and now I really love them.
HOLY CRAP!! :oops:

I ordered a very inexpensive amp from Amazon, just to try it out...

WOW!

Originally just using the headphones from the Mini, the headphones seemed 'soft', like the artificial cap on some Bose headphones.

NOW, I'm getting the sound I expected. I'm curious what a DAC will do now.
 

S.B.G

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 8, 2010
26,670
10,447
Detroit
HOLY CRAP!! :oops:

I ordered a very inexpensive amp from Amazon, just to try it out...

WOW!

Originally just using the headphones from the Mini, the headphones seemed 'soft', like the artificial cap on some Bose headphones.

NOW, I'm getting the sound I expected. I'm curious what a DAC will do now.
Ahhh... looks like another person about to fall down the hi-fi rabbit hole!

With a proper DAC, you'll start to hear more detail, more imaging, and better soundstage. That is as long as the headphones you're using are of good quality and can deliver all of those things.

But, you'll listen to a favorite song of yours you've heard hundreds of times before and it will sound even better. You'll hear things that you never heard before and wonder where that sound came from.

A good amp, good DAC, good cans and high-quality source, like proper FLAC or if in iTunes, ALAC and you'll never listen to music quite the same again.
 

D.T.

macrumors G4
Sep 15, 2011
11,050
12,467
Vilano Beach, FL
HOLY CRAP!! :oops:

I ordered a very inexpensive amp from Amazon, just to try it out...

WOW!

Originally just using the headphones from the Mini, the headphones seemed 'soft', like the artificial cap on some Bose headphones.

NOW, I'm getting the sound I expected. I'm curious what a DAC will do now.

A DAC can be a bit more nuanced. [As you may know] it's what reconstructs the digital representation of a song file into analog for listening (after passing through some amplification, and winding up at a speaker/transducer).

Exactly __how__ that reconstruction takes places affects what you hear. Kind of like visual artifacts in displaying a JPG, there can be audio aberrations in a badly converted file, and there's some - for lack of a better terms - "guessing" as to the best analog version of a chunk of digital data, and how well that's done make a difference (and by well, I don't necessarily mean "accurate").

When you listen to music from a Mac, iOS devices, etc., you're already using a DAC, the one built into the device to provide that "listenable" analog output, but the implementation can be inferior to a device that only does that one task :)
 

S.B.G

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 8, 2010
26,670
10,447
Detroit
hahaha.. I was laughing my ass off at Zeos' review and rant on Apple's iTunes and ALAC format. He's not wrong.

NSFW language:
 

PinkyMacGodess

Suspended
Mar 7, 2007
10,271
6,227
Midwest America.
Just to throw this out there. I remember hearing that new 'remastered' CD's had artificially filled out sound. So I found a new remastered CD for one that I had purchased in the 90's. I ripped the two CDs and ran the audio files through a program that showed the waveform of the tracks. I was able to compare the tracks, one to another, and was surprised at the differences. The 'remastered' tracks were 'fuller', having the sound 'fattened'. I couldn't really tell much of a difference, but I was using a MacBook Pro and Apple wired ear pods. But I'm a firm believer in the idea that remastered music is an abomination. It's crazy. 'Fatten' the sound and call it better? Sad...

It might work for some music, but...

Oh, headphones? I have an old pair of Bose QC somethings. (The ones that the ear phone pivot kept breaking) They still work. I was lectured on a plane ride about how the iPod 'ruined' music, and that Bose sucked. HAH! I hate flying, so I take a Xanax, and a couple of glasses of wine before boarding. I use the QC's and the iPod to drown out the kids crying, and people trying to lecture me on my audio preferences. A plane is NOT the place to be wearing your $1,000 special cans. It's an aluminum, or carbon fiber, tube, hurtling through the air, with a lot of bored and excitable people. ANYTHING that give me a break from that cacophony is welcome.

But I do remember hearing the nuances of the LP's I had as I grew up. Hearing the occasional conversations and cues from the control room. Good sound is a human right!
 
Last edited:

bigpoppamac31

macrumors 68020
Aug 16, 2007
2,454
439
Canada
Just to throw this out there. I remember hearing that new 'remastered' CD's had artificially filled out sound. So I found a new remastered CD for one that I had purchased in the 90's. I ripped the two CDs and ran the audio files through a program that showed the waveform of the tracks. I was able to compare the tracks, one to another, and was surprised at the differences. The 'remastered' tracks were 'fuller', having the sound 'fattened'. I couldn't really tell much of a difference, but I was using a MacBook Pro and Apple wired ear pods. But I'm a firm believer in the idea that remastered music is an abomination. It's crazy. 'Fatten' the sound and call it better? Sad...

It might work for some music, but...

Oh, headphones? I have an old pair of Bose QC somethings. (The ones that the ear phone pivot kept breaking) They still work. I was lectured on a plane ride about how the iPod 'ruined' music, and that Bose sucked. HAH! I hate flying, so I take a Xanax, and a couple of glasses of wine before boarding. I use the QC's and the iPod to drown out the kids crying, and people trying to lecture me on my audio preferences. A plane is NOT the place to be wearing your $1,000 special cans. It's an aluminum, or carbon fiber, tube, hurtling through the air, with a lot of bored and excitable people. ANYTHING that give me a break from that cacophony is welcome.

But I do remember hearing the nuances of the LP's I had as I grew up. Hearing the occasional conversations and cues from the control room. Good sound is a human right!

I'm not sure how many of my CDs are "remastered". Usually it will say on it somewhere. But I do notice that a re-release of an album is often "louder" than the original. Especially if it's a re-release of an album from the 90's or earlier. I can't say I hate the sound of a remastered album but it can sound less dynamic (not sure of the correct word to use). For example I bought the re-release of the Lord of the Rings: Complete Recordings albums. To my ears it sounds great. I did not hear the original releases. I listen mainly at home with my Sennheiser HD6XX (650) on my THX789 amp and Topping D70 DAC. I'm re-ripping my CDs in Apple Lossless. I do wish Apple would support FLAC natively but I doubt that would ever happen.


hahaha.. I was laughing my ass off at Zeos' review and rant on Apple's iTunes and ALAC format. He's not wrong.

NSFW language:

I was surprised Zeos would even review any Apple as I know he hates Apple products. I will say some of it is justified. I really don't think Apple listens to its users nearly as much as it should. Would be great if Apple supported FLAC natively including in it's iTunes Music Store. I doubt it would ever happen. I would have no issue buying FLAC or even ALAC albums from the iTunes Music Store. I don't care to "rent" my music. I prefer to buy it. Guess I'm old school like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe

PinkyMacGodess

Suspended
Mar 7, 2007
10,271
6,227
Midwest America.
I'm not sure how many of my CDs are "remastered". Usually it will say on it somewhere. But I do notice that a re-release of an album is often "louder" than the original. Especially if it's a re-release of an album from the 90's or earlier. I can't say I hate the sound of a remastered album but it can sound less dynamic (not sure of the correct word to use). For example I bought the re-release of the Lord of the Rings: Complete Recordings albums. To my ears it sounds great. I did not hear the original releases. I listen mainly at home with my Sennheiser HD6XX (650) on my THX789 amp and Topping D70 DAC. I'm re-ripping my CDs in Apple Lossless. I do wish Apple would support FLAC natively but I doubt that would ever happen.




I was surprised Zeos would even review any Apple as I know he hates Apple products. I will say some of it is justified. I really don't think Apple listens to its users nearly as much as it should. Would be great if Apple supported FLAC natively including in it's iTunes Music Store. I doubt it would ever happen. I would have no issue buying FLAC or even ALAC albums from the iTunes Music Store. I don't care to "rent" my music. I prefer to buy it. Guess I'm old school like that.

They 'remaster' the audio by boosting certain frequency ranges, and if you see the differences on an audio spectrum analyzer, you can really see the difference. They 'fatten' the sound, and kill a lit if the nuance, the detail. I did my 'investigation' many years ago, but I was shocked at how muddy the sound looked. You are right, they lose a lot of the detail. Some remastered albums are less cooked than others, but the general idea seemed to be that they are altering the audio to play better on devices that notoriously don't do lower frequencies well.

I'll have to see if I can recreate the stuff I did. It was shocking. The audio purists were right...
 

RogerWilco6502

macrumors 68000
Jan 12, 2019
1,823
1,945
Tír na nÓg
Nothing special, just a pair of Sony headphones I got from Target for $30. They sound amazing though! :p
IMG_3063.JPG

I originally found this model on Amazon for $20 maybe five or six years back and those finally broke within the past six months or so after carrying them basically everywhere with me. I loved them so much I decided to buy another pair and so I did. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sman789

44267547

Cancelled
Jul 12, 2016
37,642
42,494
Sony WH-1000XM3 and Audio-Technica M50
8C8C3733-2D63-488F-B6CE-3742372BC8DA.jpeg


{In terms of audio quality and overall comfort with build construction, highly recommend both units, with the Sony’s at a higher price range with ANC.}
 

44267547

Cancelled
Jul 12, 2016
37,642
42,494
I’ve got the Sony WH-1000XM3 as well. Agree with you on audio quality and comfort. They are awesome on long haul flights.

The only minor complaint I have about them, is if they were slightly louder, but the noise canceling is absolutely perfect, The materials, fit/finish is on point, even the touch capacitive buttons for volume control and track selection is tuned just for the right amount of sensitivity.

Let me say this, I’m on board for Apples studio headphones likely launching for 2020, but they have Their work cut out for against the WH-1000XM3’s if they plan on topping them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: akash.nu

AustinIllini

macrumors G5
Oct 20, 2011
12,699
10,567
Austin, TX
I had a pair of Sony WH-1000xm2s. Their sound quality was superb with great noise cancelling. Unfortunately, my large head caused them to crack. I complained to Sony, opened multiple cases about the headband cracking, and I made zero traction. I finally spoke to the quality control manager and, when they couldn't resolve my problem, I vowed never to buy any more Sony products. Well, the crack got worse and worse, to the point now that the one ear cup broke off completely (held only by the electric cable).

Anyway, with Sony a non-viable option for me, I chose the next best thing: Bose 700. Literally everything outside of the sound profile is night and day better.
 

Attachments

  • AA3001A8-2461-46B4-81BA-5104551A7CC2.jpeg
    AA3001A8-2461-46B4-81BA-5104551A7CC2.jpeg
    373.3 KB · Views: 156

JayMysterio

macrumors 68000
Apr 24, 2010
1,534
32,961
Rock Ridge, California
I had a pair of Sony WH-1000xm2s. Their sound quality was superb with great noise cancelling. Unfortunately, my large head caused them to crack. I complained to Sony, opened multiple cases about the headband cracking, and I made zero traction. I finally spoke to the quality control manager and, when they couldn't resolve my problem, I vowed never to buy any more Sony products. Well, the crack got worse and worse, to the point now that the one ear cup broke off completely (held only by the electric cable).

Anyway, with Sony a non-viable option for me, I chose the next best thing: Bose 700. Literally everything outside of the sound profile is night and day better.
I've run through 2 Sony gaming headsets because of the same stress fracture that eventually makes the all crack. Sony says to everyone that it's their fault. Now Sony's new gaming headphones are made to remove that flaw, that was everyone's fault.

Sony's been notorious about that crack in the headbands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinIllini
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.