I wish I knew more about amps. Someday soon I need to order a set of Grados and a nice budget amp. Suggestions?
Ditto. But then again, being an Apple forum means that the regulars are more susceptible to fall to advertising & shiny things, & put up with equipment that suffers immensley from 'form over function' just because it's Apple.I'm truly surprised that so many people here own Bose headphones.
Being on a forum dedicated to Apple, I thought people cared a lot more about quality.
lost eden:
No. Bose isn't shiny or well advertised. Apple is both. And Apple don't use cheap as hell components and put a hefty price tag on the finished product. Apple use proper components and put a hefty price tag on the finished product. That's the difference.
I'm truly surprised that so many people here own Bose headphones.
Being on a forum dedicated to Apple, I thought people cared a lot more about quality.
Every Bose fan should read this: http://intellexual.net/bose.html
You can get much better headphones that Bose for much less money.
Like another poster, I've had these: http://www.audiocubes.com/product/Audio-Technica_ATH-A500_Art_Headphones.html for nearly 3 years now. Much more comfortable than any in the Bose line. Better sound quality than any Bose. Won't break after 6 months of use, and cost less than $100 shipped now.
Would I buy them again? I'd upgrade to the A900s Infact, I plan to maybe next year unless Audio-Technica releases something better.
Bose products should be avoided like a plague. Unless they were reasonably priced. For example, the original Triports and the new Triport OE should be more around the $20-$30 range.
You misunderstood. What I meant with well advertised was not the quantity of advertisement. It may be true that Bose advertisements can influence people to an extent where they think they're buying a high-end product, but I always thought Bose advertisements were simply ugly.At least where I live, Bose is pretty much the only audio company that advertise in (non tech specific) press, such as newspapers, magazines, etc. You often see their little CD systems advertised at the back of TV listings magazines proclaiming how cheap it is at 12 monthly payments of £24.99 etc. It's here that they prey on the casual listener who doesn't know anything about audio equipment - if the advert says that it's awesome high quality, they'll believe it. When they take delivery, the placebo will make them believe what they're hearing too.
This is a really good thread. I never realized there is such a range of earbud headphones...so here's the real question: in the $50-100 range, what pair of earbuds makes the most sense for listening to the ipod while running/traveling/working? I'm encoding all my CDs at 256kbps. How much will good earbuds improve my experience over the apple earbuds?
I'm leaning towards shure exc, but wondering if anybody has suggestions out there for products to compare against.
Even though it's closed, I have some wonderful experience with Sennheiser's HD 215. They were about 70-80€ when I bought them, and they're both sturdy and sound great.I currently have the AKG K-66 headphones and they're great. I keep them at work for listening to my iPod. I recently realized that my Aiwa mini stereo pales in comparison to my AKGs in terms of sound quality. I'd like to get a new set of headphones for using at home.
My critera:
*Better than the K-66 (I want my home cans to be better than my work cans)
*$100 or less
*No headphone amp required
*Circumaural
*Open or semi-open back
Any recommendations?
Just ordered some Shure SE530's