Why?
Well turns out I got an email from Engadget's Joshua Topolsky saying I cannot use the (my) domain because it would be violating AOL's and their copyrights. And that I should turn it over to them. Well there goes the $7
Why?
Well turns out I got an email from Engadget's Joshua Topolsky saying I cannot use the (my) domain because it would be violating AOL's and their copyrights. And that I should turn it over to them. Well there goes the $7
Well turns out I got an email from Engadget's Joshua Topolsky saying I cannot use the (my) domain because it would be violating AOL's and their copyrights. And that I should turn it over to them. Well there goes the $7
Ill have to agree with dewguy. It sucks that WD packaged some software that has no ability to be removed.
You can download an utility from WD that removes it. I did.
Well turns out I got an email from Engadget's Joshua Topolsky saying I cannot use the (my) domain because it would be violating AOL's and their copyrights. And that I should turn it over to them. Well there goes the $7
Couldn't you have asked engadget to at least give you your $7. It's their fault the domain was available. They should've bought it first.
Well what were you going to use the domain for in the first place? If its NOT going to be a tech. site/blog I don't see how they can do anything to you.
Well turns out I got an email from Engadget's Joshua Topolsky saying I cannot use the (my) domain because it would be violating AOL's and their copyrights. And that I should turn it over to them. Well there goes the $7
A bunch of stuff for my bike.
<A lot of Thomson stuff>
I don't know. I have no idea what to do now so I'm just forwarding to engadget..
Have it forward to Gizmodo is something.
So isn't the word Mac copyrighted too?