the price is nice. and the colors are great. But when you stretch 1900X1200 to 28 inches, everything looks pretty large. go to an apple store and set a 27" imac to 1900X1080 and you'll see what i mean.
And the stand is a little too high and unstable. I do plan to wall mount it. But you really can't beat the price.
I'll take 16:10 over 16:9 any day.
I've got the last-generation of this monitor. At the point when I purchased, the last-gen had 5 stars on NewEgg, the new one had four, there were many more reviews for the old one, and the old one was $30 cheaper, so it was kind of a no-brainer.
I'm not sure setting a 27" iMac to 1920x1080 will really give the same experience, at least in terms of quality, since it will be quite pixellated. Yes, items are bigger, but the Hanns-G is really a gaming monitor, not a productivity monitor (though I use it for gaming only about 1% of the time
).
On my older monitor, the stand is the perfect height for me. I can simply move my exes from the left to the right or top to the bottom, never need to move my head. I still plan to get an Ergotron arm though, the kind that clamps to a desk, simply because I want to move it further back but my desk prevents me from doing that (not that it needs it...).
16:10 is def. the way to go. But sometimes I think I should have got that high-res, 23" Dell that does 2048x1152, even if it is 16:9, simply because those extra 500,000 pixels could come in handy
The Dell is also around the same price, $300, but it likes to wildly fluctuate. While I was tracking the price on Dell's website, I saw it go between $220 and $380, and it seemed to change weekly.
Oh yeah and the Dell has more connectivity options and a webcam. But I still love my Hanns-G
EDIT: While I was typing, I thought it seemed like a lot of writing... but full-screened on the 28", it looks like nothing