What kind of desk is that?
IKEA galant desk combination right in birch veneer / t legs.. was around $280.
What kind of desk is that?
Same desk that I have. Great value for money and suprisingly good quality.IKEA galant desk combination right in birch veneer / t legs.. was around $280.
For goodness sake, why can't people understand that because of the worse (or shoddy) backlight and internal technology, the dell display are not as good, or accurate as the Apple Cinema display.
People just don't seem to get it. They also look horrible, but that is an opinion, the quality is not.
finally someone with some sense!What don't YOU get about it? You do know that the 2007WFP and the ACD 20" use the exact same panel (so do the 30" models) -- the picture looks identical. I know. I've seen them in use side by side. That makes your "accurate" argument sound pretty dumb. And as long as you don't get one of the early-revision 2007WFPs with the color banding problem (which I personally have never seen, but for which Dell will provide you a replacement), the Dell is definitely a better value. If you want to buy an ACD, that's cool, it's a nice looking monitor and it's your money. But stop being an elitist snob and knocking those of us who want more value and not just more looks.
I personally think Dell's monitors look really good anyway, especially the latest models. I don't know why some people think they're so horrible looking. Not Apple design, sure, but I think they're pretty slick.
finally someone with some sense!
I buy what I think is best value for money. I think a MBP is best value for money, I think the Dell is best value for money.
Thank god you stopped the whole Dell/Apple debacle. That what half of these recent posts are about!What don't YOU get about it? You do know that the 2007WFP and the ACD 20" use the exact same panel (so do the 30" models) -- the picture looks identical. I know. I've seen them in use side by side. That makes your "accurate" argument sound pretty dumb. And as long as you don't get one of the early-revision 2007WFPs with the color banding problem (which I personally have never seen, but for which Dell will provide you a replacement), the Dell is definitely a better value. If you want to buy an ACD, that's cool, it's a nice looking monitor and it's your money. But stop being an elitist snob and knocking those of us who want more value and not just more looks.
I personally think Dell's monitors look really good anyway, especially the latest models. I don't know why some people think they're so horrible looking. Not Apple design, sure, but I think they're pretty slick.
I think people associate Apple with rich people. I bought my NEC monitor because it was the best at the current time, and it does not match my iBook, or anything else really, whatsoever.R.Youden said:I agree. I have the 2005FPW and it is great, I like it more that the 2007 version. I just hate it when people think because I have a mac I must be able to afford a ACD. I buy what I think is best value for money. I think a MBP is best value for money, I think the Dell is best value for money.
IKEA galant desk combination right in birch veneer / t legs.. was around $280.
You do know that the 2007WFP and the ACD 20" use the exact same panel (so do the 30" models)
That makes your "accurate" argument sound pretty dumb.
But stop being an elitist snob and knocking those of us who want more value and not just more looks.
I personally think Dell's monitors look really good anyway, especially the latest models. I don't know why some people think they're so horrible looking. Not Apple design, sure, but I think they're pretty slick.
I think you aren't realising the problem here. The reason he is having a go at the Apple monitor is because Daneoni told the guy he should "spring" for an ACD merely because it looks prettier, and also the fact it has cables coming out of it (oh noes! something electrical has cables!).
Of course he's gonna take a pop at the ACD when some blithering idiot thinks money is no object and its worth $400 for the silver border round the screen.
To you the display is worth it because it is better quality when you are working in a pro environment. To the guy who posted his setup, does it look like he needs it?
Why is the desk so close to your bed and is your room small or something? I'm asking cause I have a cheap desk I got from Wal-Mart and I want something alot nicer but my room is small.
I've been lurking the board for a good while and finally signed up. Figured this would be a good first post.
24" iMac -- 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
PowerBook -- 550 MHz G4
Here's my Mac setup. I'm 17 so I guess I'll post it in both threads. Just got a fresh coat of white paint. Everything in my room is black & white now.I'm not spoiled. I work for this stuff. (^_^)
- Wall-mounted Samsung HDTV & In-wall speakers -
![]()
Here's a bad render of what I want for my iMac...
![]()
To be honest, that's actually pretty good. Now if you could smooth those speakers and correct the ipod a bit, you'll be just fine.![]()
I think the mouse looks pretty spiffy. Good job, and good luck assembling your future setup.Hmm, thanx! So is the Mouse Ok then? I suck @ perspectivesBut I've got a better set up now... iMac to OLD school NAD Amp to Quad stereo speakers