An interesting read recently from Google's security team:
Google today detailed how it has "significantly increase[d] Pixel 9’s resilience to baseband attacks" and cellular modem vulnerabilities...
9to5google.com
Mature
software hardening techniques that are commonplace in the Android operating system, for example, are often absent from cellular firmwares of many popular smartphones.
Google's Pixel 9 uses a standard Exynos Modem 5400, but apparently Google has significantly hardened & customized the firmware.
//
Unfounded speculation: perhaps the SDX71M allows Apple to control more of the firmware. That is,
X70: Apple uses mostly Qualcomm's firmware with slightly less control
X71M: Apple uses slightly less Qualcomm firmware with slightly more control
I have no idea, but I'd definitely like to learn more.
//
I thought it might be related to the missing LTE band (46, unlicensed), but I've learned that band almost precisely overlaps with Wi-Fi 5 GHz (!) and thus was rarely active. Perhaps the Wi-Fi 7 introduction was a good time to clean it up old 4G bands?
//
Before people post this link, it seems to be made-up nonsense:
SpeedSmart.net is an HTML5 Internet speed test. Test your internet connection speed in seconds to locations all around the world with this broadband speed test to see how fast your home or mobile internet connection really is across every device.
speedsmart.net
It was tabulated on
September 11, 2024—iPhone 16s did not launch until Sept 20, 2024. So this site did one of two improper comparisons:
1) Comparing ~500 iPhone 16 review units (huge selection bias) vs ~10,000,000+ iPhone 15 consumer units. These are not real numbers, but just orders of magnitude.
or
2) Using data from Android devices with X75 modems (which would be even more irresponsible) vs iPhone 15s with X70.
I'd wait a few more months to see aggregated data comparisons between the X70 iPhones vs X71M iPhones for any usable performance comparisons.