Yes, but according to BB, he never agreed that the money he was earning would be saved.ftaok said:The argument here is that the dad says that BB already has a computer that is fine. Also, the second assertion from dad is that BB agreed to save the money instead of spending it on whatever.
I can understand the point that BB should not get the Mini because his dad believes his current computer is good enough.
I don't agree that his dad is being fair, however. IF, as BB is stipulating, that the money was never intended to be saved, then he should be able to spend it however he sees fit (well, within reason).
Therefore it all boils down to whether or not BB is justified in believing that purchasing the Mini falls in the range of "within reason" or whether his dad is justified in believing that that purchase falls outside of the range of "within reason".
That said, I would agree with what you said, however I would say it like this: I think that in the end BB should not disobey his dad, but because his dad is being unfair (seemingly), BB should still try to change his dad's mind.