I hope you are successful. You never mentioned the tape backup. Can you recover something from them?
Probably a good idea to put one more disk inside the computer and turn on Time Machine.The tape backup is for the server, these 2 internal drives I have in the Mac Pro are for more personal backups that aren't related to work. About 1 million files.
Probably a good idea to put one more disk inside the computer and turn on Time Machine.
The whole point of raid 1 is to have a backup.
But this is a user error.
Backups would have protected you from a user error.
Parity RAID or mirroring does not protect you from a user error.
Like I said above and in many posts in this thread, I know that and you are right. Don't have to rub it in my face.
These things happen, it's life. As much as I try to be my own IT here, I'm low on staff and have to do a lot of things myself and don't have time to do backups for certain things sometimes.
I'm hoping this thread helps someone else. I'm looking for a solution not a life lesson. That lesson is already learned.
If you've just quick-erased the drive, all you'll have done is killed the header, you should be able to get most of your stuff back.
If this was an SSD with TRIM enabled though, you'd be stuffed
Can't recommend OpenZFS enough at this point. If you need a local RAID setup, it really is the most resilient solution.
Did you ask SoftRAID though?Problem is when you lose the partition table. You can recover the files but most of the structure and file names can't come back.
I'm currently looking at a solution from this free app and trying to recover the partition table. Im making a copy of the RAID 3TB drive at the moment just to be safe.
Data Rescue 4 wasn't able to bring back every folder for me...
....
Can't recommend OpenZFS enough at this point. If you need a local RAID setup, it really is the most resilient solution.
Like I said above and in many posts in this thread, I know that and you are right. Don't have to rub it in my face.
These things happen, it's life. As much as I try to be my own IT here, I'm low on staff and have to do a lot of things myself and don't have time to do backups for certain things sometimes.
I'm hoping this thread helps someone else. I'm looking for a solution not a life lesson. That lesson is already learned.
Did you ask SoftRAID though?
Sorry to hear about your misfortune atm SDAVE!
When I started with a Mac Pro 3.1 in 2008 (Professional Photographer) I thought it wise to get myself an Apple Raid Card Pro for it and create a RAID5 on it, as my (newbie) level of techie would have thought to be my safe-heaven for user/hardware failures. MAN was I wrong in that assumption, but as you stated: "lessons learned"!
I had a failure of HHDs and lost my total
system. Goodbye ARC and Hello Backups!
I realy DO HOPE you will be able to restore your 90k files back were you want them to be, back under your own control.
I wish you good luck restoring your files and some beers that comes aside!
Cheers
hay i do photography, I back up on to external drives in pairs of two, one a live drive to use and one a pure backup of the live drive. I keep the contents of the drives identical.
that's a simple way to backup, if there's a power serge or something only one drive will get fried.
I only use the drives for storage all live projects are coped on to my internal drives then worked on with the external discontented.
RAID is not a backup, it's to keep files live 24/7 in a professional environment where non interrupted use of data is the priority (& speed).
your better of with two (not raided drives) that just have the same files on at the same time inside your mac pro so you cant bork them both at the same time with user error
good luck with your files iv had to do HD recovery's on bad drives not fun.
was easier years ago when drives where smaller as we tended to have less files so less problem to manualy sort them all out.
(im thinking about getting a blue ray to have a mixed media backup system ie file on HD A, B + blue ray disc)
ZFS doesn't completely protect you from Operator errors either. If issue a ZFS command to destroy a volume/pool/etc it gets nuked. Actually probably in worse shape because little to no "scan and recover from unorganized low level blocks" tools out there.
If you accidentally delete a file/subdirectory ... sure you can get it back with a snapshot. But if if start nuking large chunks of the meta data at the top level container abstraction level, you aren't getting it back.
With ZFS those kinds of commands are uusally issued less often. Typically put together a detailed plan in advance of how the disks are organized and then perhaps incrementally add disks but operationally don't "nuke" whole pools or top level organization after it is deployed. ( or have to start over again with a another set of disks to reorganize).
That's why I backup to a FreeNAS box running RAIDZ2
So it seems like I'm pretty much screwed. God, why does HFS+ have to be so complicated. I remember this same thing happened on an NTFS partition many moons ago and I was able to recover without a hitch.
I might have to spend thousands of dollars and even they can't guarantee it.
What's the difference between RAIDZ2 and a nice battery backed RAID controller with a RAID 5 or 6?