i have a mini that is less than a year old running 10.8.4 on 2.3 GHz i5. i've repaired permissions because i know how, and tech support didn't really help. any thoughts?
wb
wb
i have a mini that is less than a year old running 10.8.4 on 2.3 GHz i5. i've repaired permissions because i know how, and tech support didn't really help. any thoughts?
wb
i have a mini that is less than a year old running 10.8.4 on 2.3 GHz i5. i've repaired permissions because i know how, and tech support didn't really help. any thoughts?
wb
It has only 2 GB 1333 RAM, so that needs to be dealt with. things like opening system prefs takes 16 seconds. start up is a bit slow. the dock is jittery as you move along it. i just quit iphoto and there was a lag of about 2 seconds from when i command q to seeing the iphoto at the top of the page flash blue. my 4 year old mbp is snappy compared to this. the apps seem to run ok. it's not my machine so i don't know all the issues. i've attached a snap of the activity monitor cpu looks like isn't challenged.
wb
Activity monitor snap shows that RAM isn't an issue (and in fact I've run minis just fine with 2GB) as there is no swapping. CPU isn't an issue either. But I wonder about the antivirus program. I don't use one except at work, on a PC, where I have no choice. It saps a lot of the performance, very noticeably!
It has only 2 GB 1333 RAM, so that needs to be dealt with. things like opening system prefs takes 16 seconds. start up is a bit slow. the dock is jittery as you move along it. i just quit iphoto and there was a lag of about 2 seconds from when i command q to seeing the iphoto at the top of the page flash blue. my 4 year old mbp is snappy compared to this. the apps seem to run ok. it's not my machine so i don't know all the issues. i've attached a snap of the activity monitor cpu looks like isn't challenged.
wb
Your Activity Monitor is reading 31 MB free memory. That's almost zilch.
It doesn't look like it's really being taxed, memory-wise. Upgrading to 4GB would make a difference. Upgrading to 8GB would be better and would go a long way towards future-proofing it. 16GB is the maximum for that model and may be overkill, but still isn't all that expensive ($110 or so, like CoachDave said).
But just to be sure, in Activity Monitor, can you switch where it says "Active Processes" to All processes and post the new screen shot? You may need to click on the %CPU header to sort it if they don't all fit on one screen.
A properly running system should have very little free memory, as free memory is simply wasted. The two important items is Wired+Active, which is the amount of memory being used, in this case 1331.5 MB. The Inactive memory mostly represents programs that have been closed but whose memory image is still present -- these can be restarted instantly.
The second important item is Page Outs, which is what occurs when you are out of memory and the least recently referenced program/data is written out to the hard drive to make room for something else. This kills performance. If it is 0, as it is in this case, the amount of memory is fine.
You can't assess the situation just from page-ins, page-outs, and swap file size as they are heavily influenced by how long the computer has been running and what it's recently been doing. If the OP just started his Mac and opened those apps, this is the result you'd expect. Let him use it for a few hours and then see what Activity Monitor shows. It certainly isn't going to look like it does in his/her screen shot with only 2 GB.
This link claims no free memory is a sign you don't have enough:
http://macintoshhowto.com/hardware/does-my-mac-need-more-memory.html
"Moving data from physical memory to disk is called paging out (or swapping out); moving data from disk to physical memory is called paging in (or swapping in) Extended periods of paging activity reduce performance significantly; such activity is sometimes called disk thrashing.
Tip: Page outs occur when your Mac has to write information from RAM to the hard drive (because RAM is full). Adding more RAM may reduce page outs."
The article says that, but the quote from Apple only mentions the paging.
Since OS X attempts to utilize all available memory, "free" memory isn't particularly useful as it is being wasted. Actually that isn't quite true -- it is used for disk caching, so it will improve performance somewhat, particularly with databases.
Paging does matter and certainly accumulates over time. Each GB represents about 20 seconds lost to paging. We've got a MBA that gets light use (mainly Safari) with 2GB of RAM that shows 10MB of paging after 3 1/2 days of uptime. We also have two Mac minis used as entertainment centers that I recently upgraded from 2 to 4 GB of RAM while going from Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion. I don't recall them swapping either.
Somewhat luckily, for all those confusing numbers, Mavericks has come up with a new metric "Memory Pressure" to indicate how tight memory is. It will provide a good gauge to the need for additional RAM.
_____________________________________this is a very easy fix buy ram end of story. 2gb ram is killing speed.
_____________________________________
Does it make any sense that Apple would sell this product knowing it had insufficant RAM from the factory...and that Apple knew that out of the box
the performance would be a big problem....answer is NO
Yes, I had 8GB with my Mac Mini and had same problems and the only thing that fixed it is to erase and re-install.
If you're having performance issues, this may help:i have a mini that is less than a year old running 10.8.4 on 2.3 GHz i5. i've repaired permissions because i know how, and tech support didn't really help. any thoughts?
wb
Disk Utility repairs the permissions for files installed by the Mac OS X Installer, Software Update, or an Apple software installer. It doesn’t repair permissions for your documents, your home folder, and third-party applications. You can verify or repair permissions only on a disk with Mac OS X installed.
If repairing permissions results in error messages, some of these messages can be ignored and should be no cause for concern.Does Disk Utility check permissions on all files? Files that aren't installed as part of an Apple-originated installer package are not listed in a receipt and therefore are not checked. For example, if you install an application using a non-Apple installer application, or by copying it from a disk image, network volume, or other disk instead of installing it via Installer, a receipt file isn't created. This is expected. Some applications are designed to be installed in one of those ways. Also, certain files whose permissions can be changed during normal usage without affecting their function are intentionally not checked.
No, that's not normal. There are a few possibilities. (I haven't read the entire thread, so if these have been covered, please disregard) One could be a failing drive. You should make sure you have a current backup of your drive at all times, especially if this is a possibility. It could also be a runaway process. Follow every step of the following instructions precisely. Do not skip any steps.I have done a reinstall and it didn't make any difference. it also doesn't seem to get any worse over time.she uses it very lightly, only safari, mail, iphoto. like i said, the apps seem to run ok, though menu selections take slightly longer than they should and apps start slow for the first time. i'm not totally techy, but i have an idea of how things work. so, is it normal for system prefs to take 15 sec to open? my 2009 MBP system preffs open in 3 sec. i know this is nothing to base performance on, but that and the slow response to commands, to me does suggest that something is not up to snuff.
wb