Birth and death are both processes. We like to think of them as occurring instantaneously, but it really doesn't happen that way.Certainly an interesting character; a lot can be learned, particularly for me the illustrative influence of unwavering conjecture. His death marked the death of Apple and the birth of a very different company with the same name.
Apple died with Jobs. It took a few years. Tim Cook loves to take credit for the Apple Watch, but it's clearly nonsense (compare the Nano Touch to the Apple Watch - it's quite clear that the Watch is just a next iteration of the Nano). I think the Apple Watch was the last time we saw Job's hands involved in a product. Maybe we could argue M1 has something to do with him - IDK if when Apple got into designing chips for the iPhone if the plan was always to eventually grow them into being chips for the Mac or not, or if that was an original idea that came post-Jobs.
I'd say HomePod has nothing to do with Jobs. I don't think he would have ever released that product. Siri would have either been developed to be useful, or sidelined - he wouldn't have left her as useless as the day he unveiled her and simultaneously made her the sole feature of a product like the HomePod.