Apple did open up Homekit. They support Matter.
You should give some supporting reasons if you think "Matter is crap". It the problem really Matter or Apple's poor implementation of it?
I. am using Home Assitant's (beta) Matter controller and then exporting the whole Matter fabric, to Apple's Home using homekit protocol.. This seems to be more reliable than multi controller.
Point taken. I read a reddit thread where they said it did, but I accept you point, and understand. Thanks. Also, didn’t realise these Nanoleafs didn’t have thread/matter. I should have read the story properly. I have the thread Light bulbs, so I assumed (wrongly) that they would be consistent.No it will not. The iPhone lacks a Thread radio. It has "only" WiFi, Cell, Bluetooth, nearfeild (NFC) and GPS reciever. It does NOT have Thread, zigbee, LoRan or anything else.
That said, these "skylights" don't use Thread or Matter. Nanoleaf does make a thread/Matter light bulb.
The iPhone has to use IPv6 over WiFi to a border router to access the Thread network
Agree 100%.It's so ironic to me. As technology advances and lighting (and 'smart' lighting) is taking off and seemingly everywhere, we are actually going backwards in the quality of lighting that is currently available today. These particular lights look like they give off cold, ugly, and unflattering light - like old school fluorescent lighting. Maybe the colors would be cool in certain settings.
But, thanks to corporate greed, instead of putting more money behind making efficient halogen lighting (to get to the magical green wattage) to make them even more efficient, lighting corporations (GE, Philips, et al), decided to go the cheap route and just produce ugly, dingy, and just downright depressing LED lighting.
While LEDs have come a long way from the CFL days, it's still absolute trash compared to halogen and other incandescent lighting. I personally stock-piled as many various bulbs that I currently use throughout my home, so I should be good for a while, but unless there is some sort of major advancement in LED lighting technology, we have a poorly lit future ahead of us.
I know, many people would never notice or even care about this, but for those of use who know that lighting is pretty much everything when it comes to home style, decor, vibe and atmosphere, not to mention photography, it's a big deal.
The company might be but I highly doubt the product manufacture is.Nanoleaf is from Canada
Genuine question; what's a good alternetive matter enabled brand that can be driven with homekit only?Can’t get over the dead space in the centre of each square…
Everything nanoleaf does seems so, so tacky.
I’ve always found Meross to be great. I’m about to get the light strips. https://shop.meross.com/collections/smart-lightingGenuine question; what's a good alternetive matter enabled brand that can be driven with homekit only?
I'm planning to invest in a smart light setup.
Nothing fancy, mostly just changing the colour of the lights.
It's so ironic to me. As technology advances and lighting (and 'smart' lighting) is taking off and seemingly everywhere, we are actually going backwards in the quality of lighting that is currently available today. These particular lights look like they give off cold, ugly, and unflattering light - like old school fluorescent lighting. Maybe the colors would be cool in certain settings.
But, thanks to corporate greed, instead of putting more money behind making efficient halogen lighting (to get to the magical green wattage) to make them even more efficient, lighting corporations (GE, Philips, et al), decided to go the cheap route and just produce ugly, dingy, and just downright depressing LED lighting.
While LEDs have come a long way from the CFL days, it's still absolute trash compared to halogen and other incandescent lighting. I personally stock-piled as many various bulbs that I currently use throughout my home, so I should be good for a while, but unless there is some sort of major advancement in LED lighting technology, we have a poorly lit future ahead of us.
I know, many people would never notice or even care about this, but for those of use who know that lighting is pretty much everything when it comes to home style, decor, vibe and atmosphere, not to mention photography, it's a big deal.
Agree 100%.
It's criminal how LED manufacturers have colluded to make LED bulbs last a SHORTER amount of time than they used to.
Remember the original LED lights that you got a 5 year warranty for because they would just last and last? Turns out that was as good as it gets
It's sickening that companies are putting engineering resources into making our products less durable just so they can sell more.
This is the case not just with lights or tech products, but with everything.
Ever wonder why the soles of your $200 Goretex shoes wear out in a year? That's by design.
That's on manufacturers trying to squeeze every last cent of profit, not a fault of LED technology in and of itself. This is nothing new. Ever heard of the Phoebus cartel from the 1920s? They're the reason each incandescent bulb only lasts 1000 hours to this day while the centenial light bulb made in the 1890s has been continuously burning from more than a century.
It's so ironic to me. As technology advances and lighting (and 'smart' lighting) is taking off and seemingly everywhere, we are actually going backwards in the quality of lighting that is currently available today. These particular lights look like they give off cold, ugly, and unflattering light - like old school fluorescent lighting. Maybe the colors would be cool in certain settings.
But, thanks to corporate greed, instead of putting more money behind making efficient halogen lighting (to get to the magical green wattage) to make them even more efficient, lighting corporations (GE, Philips, et al), decided to go the cheap route and just produce ugly, dingy, and just downright depressing LED lighting.
While LEDs have come a long way from the CFL days, it's still absolute trash compared to halogen and other incandescent lighting. I personally stock-piled as many various bulbs that I currently use throughout my home, so I should be good for a while, but unless there is some sort of major advancement in LED lighting technology, we have a poorly lit future ahead of us.
I know, many people would never notice or even care about this, but for those of use who know that lighting is pretty much everything when it comes to home style, decor, vibe and atmosphere, not to mention photography, it's a big deal.
This is good, Maybe it will trickle down to the lower priced phones. But on the other hand, I assume no one wants to use a phone as a border router. So what is the purpose? I think maybe to allow the phone to be used as a light switch. Having a Thread radio means the data does not need to go over WiFi twice before even getting to a border router. Thinks like dimmer sliders should be more responsive.iPhone 15 Pro has thread
I've just started experimenting with Shelly products. They offer a range of small WiFi based boxes that can fit inside most electrical boxes and make dumb lights and dumb switches "smart". So far they seems to be very reliable although I've not directly connected them to HomeKit. What makes them nice is that you can on-board and configure them with no special app. They power on initially and look like an access point with a web server. There is a Shelly App you can use but any browser will work. The little $9 box has a webserver inside.I quite agree with you. I wasn't too happy with the light from a lot of these products (I have 3x nanoleaf products, lots of Hue bulbs, Meross, etc.). Have you looked at Waveform Lighting and Yuji Lighting? These companies have really high quality light used for professional coloring application (and industrial / residential applications) though their bulbs aren't "smart". At this point, I've switched 80% of the lights in my house to products by Waveform and Yuji and it's so much better.
Nanoleaf makes complete garbage. Everything fails within a couple years. Hard pass.
The comment you were “agreeing 100%” with is saying the issue lies in inherent issue with LED technology rather than cheap parts and planned obsolescence. I disagree entirely with that notion.We seem to agree on the entire topic here and yet your tone couldn't be more condescending
Good times
The comment you were “agreeing 100%” with is saying the issue lies in inherent issue with LED technology rather than cheap parts and planned obsolescence. I disagree entirely with that notion.
It’s not about where it was made, it is about the company that designed and accepted the quality. I think the iPhones assembled in China have been fantastic build quality and that’s down to Apple. These products are made by a Canadian Company and accepted as the standard they want. If they look cheap it’s because it’s Cheap looking Canadian Junk.Cheap looking Ch*nese junk
It’s not about where it was made, it is about the company that designed and accepted the quality. I think the iPhones assembled in China have been fantastic build quality and that’s down to Apple. These products are made by a Canadian Company and accepted as the standard they want. If they look cheap it’s because it’s Cheap looking Canadian Junk.