Which is exactly what I said they were going to do.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Rumored pro chip
- Thread starter cmaier
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Which is exactly what I said they were going to do.
One thing that I am truly thankful for is that these naming conventions are, compared to other companies, quite simple. Once Apple releases their next SoC in the 'M' series, we'll probably know almost right away what it means. Apple is very good at reducing complexity, sometimes too good, but not in this case, I think.
Compare this to Intel and AMD. With some amount of research, a consumer with enough knowledge can generally figure out what the specs are, but it's not easy at first glance. For instance, Linus just did a video comparing an identical AMD and Intel laptop. The AMD CPU is a Ryzen 7 5800H, while the Intel CPU is an i7-11800H. A 5800H is difficult enough to decipher, but Intel's naming scheme is outright bizarre.
The whole M1 vs. M1X vs. M2 issue is simplistic compared to what the PC side has to deal with. Plus, that doesn't even take into account things like monitor names. What's a ViewSonic VX2705-2KP-MHD? How does this pass through a marketing department? Do PC component suppliers even have marketing departments?
The naming obfuscation is on purpose. Latest designs are often either delayed or suffer from production shortages, so rebranding is a common and popular way to keep an illusion of innovation and convince users to “upgrade”. Apple is also guilty of these things sometimes (e.g. A12Z and A12X are the same chip), but generally they tend to be more “honest” with their advertising practices because of the company culture and the special nature of their products.
The A12X and A12Z are the same SoC, but the A12Z does have all 8 GPU cores activated whereas the A12X only had 7 so there was a real and measurable performance difference between them.
Talking about Lakes: https://wccftech.com/intel-alder-la...allegedly-able-to-achieve-a-turbo-of-5-3-ghz/
I somewhat agree, because lately the naming conventions have been particularly bad, but ever since Intel abandoned marketing in gigahertz, product names went off a cliff. For instance, when Intel was on the top of their game, had no issues with their fabs, and AMD wasn't competitive, they still had names like the i7-4770, which isn't better than what we have today. The numbering has gotten longer in characters, but it's all useless without a special decoder ring, and has been for many years, long before major product delays.
If Apple were giving the "X" and "Z" variants a different generational numbering scheme, then I would agree, but this simply implies an adjustment to the existing product. I don't see any fault in this form of marketing, and it's better than A12X+1 or whatever Intel might dream up.
Yes, these things tend to get worse as the innovation stagnates. Things like “generation n” become meaningless if half of those products are rebrands/minor reconfigurations of older designs. All mainstream CPU and GPU makers are guilty of this.
In retrospect, you are right. Apple is indeed very transparent that the changes between those to versions are very minor. In this regard they are certainly much more user friendly.
Busy news cycle CPU wise. Seems like Zen 4 will be on 5nm. https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-raphael-zen4-desktop-cpus-likely-limited-to-16-cores
Yeah, well, when they get to M5, the SoC will be able to pilot a federation star ship all by itself, and still be smaller than an industrial washing machine. And we may be inching closer to developing warp drive, so that M5 will come in handy.But in the year 3041 Apple may have to rethink the naming because of M1021X.
Yes. A bit better graphics performance at the cost of slightly lower cpu performance according to the benchmark I have run on my a12z.
And so will be the next-gen Nvidia GPUs: https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-...ies-design-allegedly-finalized-using-tsmc-5nm
Totally makes sense for TSMC to still invest in 5nm fabs, esp. if they get the US gov. to help fund it.
“About two years” they used some weasel words to not give themselves a hard timeline.
There's absolutely nothing complex about the Intel i9 13900XK-Rev. 1 (Unlocked) (OC Edition) [RGB] line of CPUs, sir.
Which is perfectly understandable due to Corona shortages/uncertainties
Last edited:
Laaaame. I think it puts a damper on the Apple Silicon change if they’re gonna release another Intel machine.
i think its the only model where it doesn't put a damper on their conversion.
people that buy those have long buying periods and need stuff to be native before they switch.