Nothing unfortunate at all and they are all facts based on the so called evidence as you call it
Facts:
- At 45 second he admits phones had been powered down and hardly used in years other than on a couple of occasion when he compared them. This is outside guidelines of storage for most OEM's who recommend storing and maintaining charge at 50%
- At 1 min 14 seconds he admits he has stored them over the recommended 35C temperature again outside OEM guidelines
- Again at 1 min 42 seconds he shows his email noting he exceeded temperature's and that all phones were old and out of warranty
- He also showed no emails or correspondence that involved a NDA and only verbally said they insisted they pick them up
- At 9 min 5 seconds now comes his mixed findings and the 40% or more including Dave2d that it happens to other brands
- 9 mins 10 seconds 60% mostly said it happen happened to Samsung Phones (not all)
- 9 min 30 seconds he notes these issues can be on any phones
- 9 mins and 40 seconds he notes in his sample size and of others the problem seems worse with Samsung phones
- and finally 9 mins and 43 second he surmises there is no need to panic and notes correct storage procedures should be followed
So I have no idea how or why you are managing to misunderstand or wrongly portray the facts from the so call evidence you reference
Everyone with a bit of common sense including other reviewers note that there is something odd why Samsung phones seem more susceptible to being stored incorrectly or unused for long periods
But what you come up with is just false rhetoric