Based on the specs, they are not by any means flagship devices.
Why? Dual-core CPU and 720p and qHD screens for a 2013 device.
I thought this thread was about the so called "mega"? Not the S4.
----------
Way to pick and choose what you want from what I posted.
I dont understand the need to make a massive phone and saddle it with QHD screen in case of the 5.8 and 720p (though that's not too bad) in the 6.3, let alone very mid range processor and memory ?
Seems a little backward to me ?
its for the price points they will be sold at. cheaper than s4 or note 2/3. Basically a mid/low range phablet option
they are official. might mean the note 3 stays at 5.55" which will be a good thing.
I dont understand the need to make a massive phone and saddle it with QHD screen in case of the 5.8 and 720p (though that's not too bad) in the 6.3, let alone very mid range processor and memory ?
Seems a little backward to me ?
I dont understand the need to make a massive phone and saddle it with QHD screen in case of the 5.8 and 720p (though that's not too bad) in the 6.3, let alone very mid range processor and memory ?
Samsung Android Screen Sizes:
-2.8"
-3.14"
-3.2"
-3.4"
-3.5"
-3.6"
-3.65"
-3.7"
-3.97"
-4"
-4.2"
-4.27"
-4.3"
-4.5"
-4.52"
-4.65"
-4.8"
-5"
-5.3"
-5.5"
-5.8"
-6.3"
-7"
-7.7"
-8"
-10"
-10.1"
I'm not seeing the issue here. You don't want a gigantic phone, don't buy it. I'm certainly not going to. Samsung isn't making us choose between a 5.8" and 6.3" screen, there are other options (and other manufacturers) to choose from if you want an android device.
It's not like you're being forced to choose between a 3.5" and 4" screen..
----------
I could see Samsung making the Note III 5.7" without making the phone any larger.
It's not like you're being forced to choose between a 3.5" and 4" screen...
No, but you're forced to choose anything BUT those if you want a high-end Android device. Everything is 4.7"+ and getting larger with every generation. For those of us who aren't interested in watching movies or playing games on our phones, it would be nice to have a flagship model with a 4.0-4.5" screen. I'd gladly sacrifice some screen space for pocketability and hand-holdability.
Interesting. But they're making you choose between 5" and 5.5" right now if you want the latest and greatest. If you want a Samsung Galaxy "Mega" with an HD display or quad core processor, you're SOL. If you want a Galaxy S3 Mini w/ similar specs, nope. You've got to live w/ certain concessions.
At least there's still options.
If you aren't using your phone for media or gaming, do you honestly need a fully spec'd out high end phone then?
Wow talk about making stuff just because you can. What's the point of all these different sizes? Of course people will say choice, but when do so many different sizes that aren't really that noticeably different become too much choice and just confusing. Wen you have comments on Engadget making jokes you know it's bad....they're usually very pro-Samsung.
http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/11/samsung-galaxy-mega-6-3-5-8/
Yeah. Web browsing, photo & video capturing/processing, GPS, and apps.
Maybe if it was 1998.
It's 2013. A phone is not just a phone.
At least there's still options.
Which currently shipping smartphone from the major names doesn't do the basics with some reasonable level of execution?
I dare say there isn't one. Therefore, a phone is just a phone.
I got his point.
----------
This should be your default response to every thread in Alternatives.
LOL