Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

TonyC28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Aug 15, 2009
2,885
7,256
USA
I am now leaning toward the Nikon D5600. Seems like a good fit for what I'm looking for. I really appreciate all of the input here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mollyc

RCAFBrat

macrumors 6502
Jul 10, 2013
270
79
Montreal, QC
A few Nikon fans here at MacRumors

Just a thought though: you might want to consider video capabilities of the camera as well. I understand that Canon has an edge over Nikon there (others can offer more on that I'm sure and maybe there isn't actually much of a difference in the real world) and then there are others that are more pleasing than Canon, like Panasonic Lumix.

As a new parent this might be something worth considering.

Cheers
 

Long

macrumors newbie
Mar 2, 2006
28
2
I am now leaning toward the Nikon D5600. Seems like a good fit for what I'm looking for. I really appreciate all of the input here.

I bought a Nikon D3300 earlier this year, and use it mostly with a 35mm f/1.8 lens. Its the best camera I've ever owned for photos of people, especially indoors, and the f/1.8 lens allows for good results indoors without a flash. Before that I had a Nikon D7000 - it was so big and heavy (relatively) that I never used it. The D3300 with either the kit lens or 35mm prime are so small and light I can take it anywhere. The added features of the D7000 were nice but I can live without them.

I haven't used a point and shoot for over five years. In my experience, nothing can beat an SLR for shutter responsiveness, and nothing beats a fast prime lens for low light results.

I haven't tried it for video, I just use an iPhone.
 

TonyC28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Aug 15, 2009
2,885
7,256
USA
I bought a Nikon D3300 earlier this year, and use it mostly with a 35mm f/1.8 lens. Its the best camera I've ever owned for photos of people, especially indoors, and the f/1.8 lens allows for good results indoors without a flash. Before that I had a Nikon D7000 - it was so big and heavy (relatively) that I never used it. The D3300 with either the kit lens or 35mm prime are so small and light I can take it anywhere. The added features of the D7000 were nice but I can live without them.

I haven't used a point and shoot for over five years. In my experience, nothing can beat an SLR for shutter responsiveness, and nothing beats a fast prime lens for low light results.

I haven't tried it for video, I just use an iPhone.
For the purposes of getting started are the kit lenses good enough?
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
57,003
56,026
Behind the Lens, UK
For the purposes of getting started are the kit lenses good enough?
100%. My 18-55 mm Nikon lens was great. Sharp. It has a variable aperture but that's it only shortcoming.
I traded mine in towards something else, but wish I'd kept it for what I got for it.
People will tell you you need fast primes or 2.8 teles or wides, but every ones journey is different. I'd certainly take a while before buying your second lens to see what focal length you need.
 

TonyC28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Aug 15, 2009
2,885
7,256
USA
Just went to Best Buy to try out the camera in person. The guy there was realllly pushing the mirror less cameras. Definitely had me tempted to change my mind.
 

admwright

macrumors regular
Sep 11, 2008
244
54
Scotland
Just went to Best Buy to try out the camera in person. The guy there was realllly pushing the mirror less cameras. Definitely had me tempted to change my mind.
Watch out that the sales guy is not just trying to sell you the product he makes the most money on.
 

flyersgl

macrumors regular
Apr 3, 2009
102
41
South Jersey, USA
I just bought a Nikon D5500 a few weeks ago when my D80 died and I am loving it! Saved a little bit by going with the D5500 instead of the newer D5600, though it wasn't that easy to find. The 18mm-55mm seems fine, though since I had a number of better lenses already I haven't used it so much. I think it will suit your needs in the near term until you decide what you need.

I'd considered the Sony 6000 mirrorless line and talked to quite a few owners who are very happy with them, but my legacy lenses kept me with Nikon and I am very happy.
 

TonyC28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Aug 15, 2009
2,885
7,256
USA
Went with the D5600 and so far I am happy with it. I was going to post my first picture but I can't seem to figure that out. Oh well. Thank you so much everyone!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mollyc

Foogoofish

macrumors regular
Jun 12, 2011
223
382
London
CONGRATS!!!

Import to computer -> On Macrumors Upload a File (below reply box) -> Full Screen

Looking forward to it :)
 

Foogoofish

macrumors regular
Jun 12, 2011
223
382
London
It says the file is too big. Oh boy do I have a lot to learn.

The Foogoofish Resizing Tool for MacRumors - BACKUP YOUR PHOTO!

Drag your BACKED UP image onto this and it will resize to your desktop.

Please, please, don't do it on the original. I have no idea what I'm doing but it works for me.
[doublepost=1505396120][/doublepost]Sorry - this is presuming you're running Mac - it's an automator resize script. Don't worry, no baddies can hide in the file.

I will be very honoured if you think I'm capable of writing a virus and don't want to open it.
 

Attachments

  • RESIZE IMAGE to 1080px long edge.app.zip
    1.5 MB · Views: 299

TonyC28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Aug 15, 2009
2,885
7,256
USA
Ok here it is, although it looks much worse after shrinking the file size. Seemed like a nice pic to take with the morning sun starting to burn away the fog. I took the picture from my back porch with the corn about 30 yards away. My very first picture that wasn't of my dog.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0027shrunk2.jpg
    DSC_0027shrunk2.jpg
    394 KB · Views: 157

Foogoofish

macrumors regular
Jun 12, 2011
223
382
London
It's by no means the best way to shrink a file (possibly the worst), but it's a quick fix.

Your photo editor will allow you to save at different resolutions which will enable you to upload here :).

Cool shot though! Very mysterious. Gotta show us a dog pic now... ;)
 

TonyC28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Aug 15, 2009
2,885
7,256
USA
It's by no means the best way to shrink a file (possibly the worst), but it's a quick fix.

Your photo editor will allow you to save at different resolutions which will enable you to upload here :).

Cool shot though! Very mysterious. Gotta show us a dog pic now... ;)
You'll have to forgive him. He's not exactly impressed with the new camera
DSC_0008.jpg
 

TonyC28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Aug 15, 2009
2,885
7,256
USA
I’m back to look for new advice on another camera. Last year I went with the Nikon D5600. I liked it but once my daughter was born I didn’t really have much time for photography. Before she arrived I was starting to get into moon and star photography. I sold my D5600 once it sat untouched for a couple months. Now I’m regretting that and want to get another camera. But now I’m thinking of going with something a little better. I’m considering a Nikon D750. Any thoughts on that one?
 

mofunk

macrumors 68020
Aug 26, 2009
2,421
161
Americas
Nikon D750 is a great full frame camera. However I wouldn't recommend it to someone if they are just casually shooting. I would look more towards the D7100 or D7200. You get the same Nikon Technology, just not the Full Frame. The glass for D750 is expensive. you could use prime lenses to save some money.

I would look at the Lenses that you want to use and then select your camera. Recently I helped a friend purchase a used D7100 with a prime lens and zoom. The lenses we selected went with what they wanted to shoot (macro, portraits, low light).

If you are ready to spend money, then go with the D750. For the moon and stars, rent the lens (70-200mm f/2.8)
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
57,003
56,026
Behind the Lens, UK
I’m back to look for new advice on another camera. Last year I went with the Nikon D5600. I liked it but once my daughter was born I didn’t really have much time for photography. Before she arrived I was starting to get into moon and star photography. I sold my D5600 once it sat untouched for a couple months. Now I’m regretting that and want to get another camera. But now I’m thinking of going with something a little better. I’m considering a Nikon D750. Any thoughts on that one?
A great camera but full frame glass isn't cheap.
I'd makesure you are going to use it before dropping that cash.
Also the quality difference isn't that much more from the DX camera you had.
 

TonyC28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Aug 15, 2009
2,885
7,256
USA
Nikon D750 is a great full frame camera. However I wouldn't recommend it to someone if they are just casually shooting. I would look more towards the D7100 or D7200. You get the same Nikon Technology, just not the Full Frame. The glass for D750 is expensive. you could use prime lenses to save some money.

I would look at the Lenses that you want to use and then select your camera. Recently I helped a friend purchase a used D7100 with a prime lens and zoom. The lenses we selected went with what they wanted to shoot (macro, portraits, low light).

If you are ready to spend money, then go with the D750. For the moon and stars, rent the lens (70-200mm f/2.8)

A great camera but full frame glass isn't cheap.
I'd makesure you are going to use it before dropping that cash.
Also the quality difference isn't that much more from the DX camera you had.

So sounds like unless I want to drop a lot of money on lenses to go along with it the D750 might not be worth it. Is that about right?
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
57,003
56,026
Behind the Lens, UK
So sounds like unless I want to drop a lot of money on lenses to go along with it the D750 might not be worth it. Is that about right?
Correct. The DX range of lenses are generally cheaper than FF glass.
Depends on what focal length you use etc. You can pick up a 50mm 1.8 lens for £3-400. But if you want something like the 24-70 2.8 it gets pricy. Second hand might be the way to go on a body and lens though.
 

mollyc

macrumors G3
Aug 18, 2016
8,065
50,762
I will say if you think there is the slightest chance that photography will stick this go round to buy FX lenses regardless. FX lenses will fit crop or full frame, but DX lenses will not work on a full frame. I know way too many people who started with DX and a crop body and then had to rebuy all their lenses when they upgraded bodies.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.