Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

danielbahl

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jul 26, 2010
23
32
Silkeborg, Denmark
The new  Watch series 6 offers 20% faster charging ? and that's for sure a welcome change ?

But I can't find any info if the Watch only charges faster with the included charger puck? Or if it also works with the older chargers?

There's no text on the charger puck the identify output power etc. to tell if it's the same tech. inside, or if there has been some updates inside the puck.

Anybody has any knowledge about this?

MX2E2
 

deeddawg

macrumors G5
Jun 14, 2010
12,468
6,571
US
We’re talking about a battery slightly more than 1Wh capacity.

I highly doubt there’s any difference outside the watch itself.

There‘s also no mention of any differentiation on the various watch charger cable product pages at Apple online store.

If you absolutely must have confirmation ping me again Tuesday or so when I should have my S6
 

danielbahl

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jul 26, 2010
23
32
Silkeborg, Denmark
Same charger, different times based on models, check description.


I can see from the link: "Apple Watch Magnetic Charging Cable (Models A2255 and A2256), and Apple 5W USB Power Adapter (Model A1385)."

However, there's no modelno. printed on the chargers, so again, I don't know if older models of the chargers supports fast charging. Guess I have to test ?⌚⏱ (I was hoping somebody already had tested this, so I didn't have to..) ?

This is a comparison photo of my older fatter Series 4 charger and the new thinner Series 6 charger.

IMG_5871.jpg
IMG_5877.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire

danielbahl

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jul 26, 2010
23
32
Silkeborg, Denmark
I decided to bundle my three older "fatter" chargers with my Series 4 sale on eBay :)

And I have just ordered two new original Apple Watch USB-C charges from Amazon (modelno. A2257). They are priced 34.10€ per cable on Amazon.de ? Total 68,2€ ($80,99) for two cables (1m and 0.3m)

Apple should be clearer if all chargers are compatible with Fast charging, or if it's only model A2255, A2256 and A2257 and how you can identify your chargers modelno. if you no longer have the box :)

download-1.jpg
download.jpg

download-5.jpg

download-2.jpg
 

deeddawg

macrumors G5
Jun 14, 2010
12,468
6,571
US
Apples had the USBC pucks for over a year, they’re not new.


JMHO it seems you’re overthinking this.

Have you actually found a real charging difference or incompatibility between the pucks?
 

danielbahl

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jul 26, 2010
23
32
Silkeborg, Denmark
Apples had the USBC pucks for over a year, they’re not new.


JMHO it seems you’re overthinking this.

Have you actually found a real charging difference or incompatibility between the pucks?

I know, not new, but "newer" than the three I have already from my S0, S3 and S4. And new in the sense that it is of the "thin" generation, and not the former "thick" generation.

I'm testing now to bring some data to the table 👍🏻 My S6 is now at 8% and I've just plugged it into a fat old charger. I'll charge it to a 100% and time it. Tomorrow when it's 8% again, I'll test with one of the newer thinner chargers and report back :)
 

the future

macrumors 68040
Jul 17, 2002
3,646
5,942
I know, not new, but "newer" than the three I have already from my S0, S3 and S4. And new in the sense that it is of the "thin" generation, and not the former "thick" generation.

I'm testing now to bring some data to the table ?? My S6 is now at 8% and I've just plugged it into a fat old charger. I'll charge it to a 100% and time it. Tomorrow when it's 8% again, I'll test with one of the newer thinner chargers and report back :)

Any results?
 

McScooby

macrumors 65816
Oct 15, 2005
1,275
819
The Paps of Glenn Close, Scotland.
I can see from the link: "Apple Watch Magnetic Charging Cable (Models A2255 and A2256), and Apple 5W USB Power Adapter (Model A1385)."

However, there's no modelno. printed on the chargers, so again, I don't know if older models of the chargers supports fast charging. Guess I have to test ?⌚⏱ (I was hoping somebody already had tested this, so I didn't have to..) ?

This is a comparison photo of my older fatter Series 4 charger and the new thinner Series 6 charger.

View attachment 959704 View attachment 959705
Yeah, you're over analysing this. On the page I linked to both charging cables were used with a 5w charger (i.e. bog standard) that u get or used to get with iPhones. Therefore it doesn't matter that u can buy a USB C equipped charger, for the purpose of the tests and your original question, the standard leads and the standard plug are what's quoted with the extra 20%, which if i'm honest is only what 10mins or so quicker? USB C may charge it slightly faster, but for the sake of an extra 5 mins or so, is it worth all the hassle, this isn't the same as the iPhone batteries and charging times?
 

BigMcGuire

Cancelled
Jan 10, 2012
9,832
14,032

The Apple Watch won't pull more than .07 amps and 3 watts. At least in my tests - plugged into chargers that can do 2.4a and 12w+. I tried 3 different charging cables.

1601399371042.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: cdcastillo

deeddawg

macrumors G5
Jun 14, 2010
12,468
6,571
US
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire

deeddawg

macrumors G5
Jun 14, 2010
12,468
6,571
US

The Apple Watch won't pull more than .07 amps and 3 watts. At least in my tests - plugged into chargers that can do 2.4a and 12w+.

Is that 0.07A at 120VAC I presume?

... because 3W at 5VDC is more like 0.6A -- which would translate to lower amperage on the 120V side. Though I get 0.025A @ 120VAC on a basic calculation, so there must be a bit of inefficiency in the 120VAC to 5VDC adapter.
 

BigMcGuire

Cancelled
Jan 10, 2012
9,832
14,032
Is that 0.07A at 120VAC I presume?

... because 3W at 5VDC is more like 0.6A -- which would translate to lower amperage on the 120V side. Though I get 0.025A @ 120VAC on a basic calculation, so there must be a bit of inefficiency in the 120VAC to 5VDC adapter.

Yeah USA California - 120VAC.

I had it plugged into a 6 port Anker 60w adapter. It registered 0 watts and 0 amps when watch was off the puck. Pop it on the puck, it took 20-30 seconds to get up to .07a and 3 watts. (Slowly incremented from 1.3w to 3).
[automerge]1601399749[/automerge]
Anyone tried 3rd party ones? Like from Aukey, Anker or Belkin?

My Insignia one (from Best Buy) has same power results as my Apple ones.

Very interested to hear about the others!
 

IamScotty

macrumors regular
Sep 18, 2018
215
101
Yeah USA California - 120VAC.

I had it plugged into a 6 port Anker 60w adapter. It registered 0 watts and 0 amps when watch was off the puck. Pop it on the puck, it took 20-30 seconds to get up to .07a and 3 watts. (Slowly incremented from 1.3w to 3).
[automerge]1601399749[/automerge]


My Insignia one (from Best Buy) has same power results as my Apple ones.

Very interested to hear about the others!

Interesting might get one looking for a 3rd party that works good.
 

deeddawg

macrumors G5
Jun 14, 2010
12,468
6,571
US
Yeah USA California - 120VAC.

I had it plugged into a 6 port Anker 60w adapter. It registered 0 watts and 0 amps when watch was off the puck. Pop it on the puck, it took 20-30 seconds to get up to .07a and 3 watts. (Slowly incremented from 1.3w to 3).

Good to know that it'll do fine with even a 5W source.


and for what it's worth, looking at my S5 and S6 charger pucks, there's no discernible visual difference.

Do you still have a way to measure wattage on a charging S5 model?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire

BigMcGuire

Cancelled
Jan 10, 2012
9,832
14,032
Good to know that it'll do fine with even a 5W source.


and for what it's worth, looking at my S5 and S6 charger pucks, there's no discernible visual difference.

Do you still have a way to measure wattage on a charging S5 model?

It got traded in already :(. I should have done it before I sent it back in. lol. Sorry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deeddawg
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.