Apple should have bought Theranos. The combo of Elizabeth's Reality Distortion Field™ conjuring skills, Tim's supply chain expertise, and Sir Jony's obsession for form over function would have been GOLD, I tell you, GOLD!
"The next Steve Jobs"Apple should have bought Theranos. The combo of Elizabeth's Reality Distortion Field™ conjuring skills, Tim's supply chain expertise, and Sir Jony's obsession for form over function would have been GOLD, I tell you, GOLD!
Flopped? The original one may have struggled. Why? Timing… or maybe because sound bars became an easier alternative for the younger generations. Today, after apple discontinued the first model, the resell market is going nuts buying and selling the units, often at prices well above retail.The one that has had me scratching my head is why, as the HomePod has (mostly) flopped, Apple hasn't picked up Sonos.
I’m extremely late to this thread but I thought this thread would lean more into a potential Sony play where there would have been an attempt to buy Sony Pictures… rather than all of Sony, with lines of businesses that Apple probably has no interest in.Why should Apple buy Sony? Different perspectives and different businesses.
The Playstation is huge for Sony, but it is not what Apple wants to offer customers. Sony sells the Playstation at a loss when released, which is something Apple never does.
Yes, definitely. Sony Pictures would be much more interesting for Apple than Sony's electronics division. This war of streaming services is generating several acquisitions and consolidation in the sector, so I would not be surprised.I’m extremely late to this thread but I thought this thread would lean more into a potential Sony play would have been an attempt to buy Sony Pictures… rather than all of Sony, with lines of businesses that Apple probably has no interest in.
Avie Tevanian was an early theranos investor. Worked out well last time apple bought a company he was involved in.Apple should have bought Theranos. The combo of Elizabeth's Reality Distortion Field™ conjuring skills, Tim's supply chain expertise, and Sir Jony's obsession for form over function would have been GOLD, I tell you, GOLD!
Viacom would be a much more sensible purchase, I would think, as it would give AppleTV a reason to exist.
Yes I know there have been several iterations of the company but I actually meant the modern ViacomCBS -- just recently renamed Paramount Global. I would make perfect sense for Apple and could be bought for a relatively reasonable price. It is exactly what Apple could use -- a huge library for content, a renown studio, and media affiliate for streaming purposes and sports (which could be sold off if necessary). It would be hard to get because Redstones still have a controlling interest and I do not think she wants to sell -- although everything has a price.You’re a few years late. Viacom was bought by CBS (now called Paramount).
Can Apple afford Sony?
Sony - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I'm not an expert, either. Only thing I'd add is on similar "Apple should by <company>" threads, people have brought up it's not just the company's market valuation, but patents, holdings, etc.I guess so, but I am not an expert in valuation of companies.
He means humility and the Japanese quality of always striving to do your best.Don't understand what "humilitry and ganbate" means.
Viacom and CBS remerged, but Viacom took control of the company.You’re a few years late. Viacom was bought by CBS (now called Paramount).