Running on Intel? Probably, yes.
Given the history of Next, I have little doubt that there's a team that maintains a port of the OS X API set for Windows. This would have to be true if the rumors of Mac OS X on Intel harware are true.
In fact, Apple considered doing this early on after the Next acquisition.
Watch out... before we see Mac OS X on Intel, we might see Apple apps (iLife, Mail.app, Keynote, Quicktime, etc.) running inside a very thin compatibility environment on top of Winodows.
Then, from the income earned, watch for Apple to give away cross-platform development tools that allow folks to build applications for both the Mac and Windows (that run slightly better on the Mac). It could happen in our life time.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
Originally posted by benjaminpg
However, a long time ago, Apple had plans for a windows Cocoa compiler. I'm sure it would need massive updating, as Cocoa has progressed so much. Unless, Apple has kept a secret internal Windows Cocoa compiler.
Given the history of Next, I have little doubt that there's a team that maintains a port of the OS X API set for Windows. This would have to be true if the rumors of Mac OS X on Intel harware are true.
In fact, Apple considered doing this early on after the Next acquisition.
Watch out... before we see Mac OS X on Intel, we might see Apple apps (iLife, Mail.app, Keynote, Quicktime, etc.) running inside a very thin compatibility environment on top of Winodows.
Then, from the income earned, watch for Apple to give away cross-platform development tools that allow folks to build applications for both the Mac and Windows (that run slightly better on the Mac). It could happen in our life time.