well if money is no concern just buy the bestEven if finances wasn't a concern, one should ask themself if they can justify spending $300 or more for an iPad Pro for capabilities they may not utilize or appreciate.
well if money is no concern just buy the bestEven if finances wasn't a concern, one should ask themself if they can justify spending $300 or more for an iPad Pro for capabilities they may not utilize or appreciate.
yeah, really like advice "if money is no concern buy ...", like why would anyone ask for any advice if money was no concern![]()
Even if finances wasn't a concern, one should ask themself if they can justify spending $300 or more for an iPad Pro for capabilities they may not utilize or appreciate.
yeah... on the other hand, if longevity is a concern, you can buy two low tier ipads in lets say 5 years cycle for the price of one pro... just sayinWhile utilization/capabilities/etc certainly factor in, I would also expect the Pros to have a sizable longevity advantage as well... so it may be a big price gap, but I would bet it will last longer as well. So for me, I'm going to lean toward the Pros in spite of the price gap. That said, the standard iPad is still a great device for the price - hence my comment
yeah... on the other hand, if longevity is a concern, you can buy two low tier ipads in lets say 5 years cycle for the price of one pro... just sayin![]()
yeah... on the other hand, if longevity is a concern, you can buy two low tier ipads in lets say 5 years cycle for the price of one pro... just sayin![]()
While utilization/capabilities/etc certainly factor in, I would also expect the Pros to have a sizable longevity advantage as well... so it may be a big price gap, but I would bet it will last longer as well. So for me, I'm going to lean toward the Pros in spite of the price gap. That said, the standard iPad is still a great device for the price - hence my comment
Longevity is relative to the price. I bought a 2017 iPad at half price of a pro. (417€vs839€) In two years from now I could buy a new iPad with new hardware (A12, oled display) and features with the same money (or a little more) of a single iPad Pro bought today, that in two years will have an obsolete display for the new oled screen that apple is starting to use from iPhone 8 and future devices.
in that case, why using longevity argument at all?Except For the fact that most will upgrade their iPad long before five years in terms of when the next hardware is released. Again, price is a subjective stance based on what one wants from an iPad. Price is justified through how someone uses the iPad, which again, is dependent
If someone finds the means between the differences in iPads.
as far as i know, only one feature is not supported and that is due to lack of RAM (so same feature is not available for pro 9.7)Yes, that is true - and it is likely that the low tier iPad in a few years will be as powerful/more powerful than the Pro now... hard to see how it wouldn't be - but then they also may not be able to fully take advantage of the features of the various OS versions. Even now the 9.7 won't get all the features of 11, right? That could certainly be a factor (and it's not just "Pro" features)
Today I received my iPad 2017 and it was real smooth running 10.3.3 so I upgraded to iOS 11 PB7 and i’m seeing a little bit of lag and stutter. Should I toss up the performance hit because it’s a beta and new OS or is it because the A9 will have problems running iOS 11?
I could get the 10.5 from BH Photo and they may pricematch Best Buy.
Today I received my iPad 2017 and it was real smooth running 10.3.3 so I upgraded to iOS 11 PB7 and i’m seeing a little bit of lag and stutter. Should I toss up the performance hit because it’s a beta and new OS or is it because the A9 will have problems running iOS 11?
I could get the 10.5 from BH Photo and they may pricematch Best Buy.