Hmmm, interesting, but I don’t follow the logic here. Big Sur is a new operating system that will supplant, not supplement, its predecessors regardless of what they may be. It is not a set of bolt-on new features added to a Catalina base, it is an entire rewrite of macOS. It will do what it does and it will not do what it doesn’t. I don’t understand how it will depend upon what an earlier OS changed. What am I missing?
I'm not convinced that Big Sur is an entirely new OS. While High Sierra changed the file system (possibly the closest to a 'new' OS), Big Sur is meant to be capable of running on current and Silicon Macs. Sure there may be an element of BS (an unfortunate acronym) that will 'translate' older software and hardware to work with it - and in that way not being unlike Classic 9 to OSX years ago - it appears to remain the core Unix system that was X, but primarily its lipstick on a pig. Making what is there look different to the user, without actually making any significant changes. I expect the same OS software to have the same issues, because they are still fixated on the form over function as per Jony Ive.
Bu hey, I could be surprised.