Why aren't the 2006 iMac and MacBook running Tiger then?I [...] keep the older Macs on the "design" of Mac OS they originally came with.
Why aren't the 2006 iMac and MacBook running Tiger then?I [...] keep the older Macs on the "design" of Mac OS they originally came with.
I actually had to look very closely to even spot the cat! And it gives the shot some additional character, as in emphasising that it's a very cozy placePS…for those who may ask, the cat was not intended to be in the shot.
He has a few places he likes to hang out and that's one of them. Mac in the pic so this relates to the thread, ;-)I actually had to look very closely to even spot the cat! And it gives the shot some additional character, as in emphasising that it's a very cozy place
The final piece to this big and drawn out puzzle arrived today. Under desk, clamp on keyboard tray.
And here it all is…
PS…for those who may ask, the cat was not intended to be in the shot. He was just there and I didn't know. His name is JJ by the way. We didn't pick the name as he was just handed over to us by two kids and their unhappy mom who were moving out.
LOL! No.Looking good, is that picture hanging on the wall just a filler till you find another monitor to put there? 😀
Why aren't the 2006 iMac and MacBook running Tiger then?
Fair point. Thanks for clarifying.I don't really like the UI of Tiger.
Your post intrigued me! Does it perform really well with Big Sur?
Running 11.3.1 on a 2GHz Mini3,1 with no probs. OCLP can make it happen. Read all the docs first, here: https://dortania.github.io/OpenCore-Legacy-Patcher/INSTALLER.html#downloading It's an adventure! The release version of OCLP is here: https://github.com/dortania/OpenCore-Legacy-Patcher/releases Also, use this to get started: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/macos-11-big-sur-on-unsupported-macs-thread.2242172/ Enjoy! 😉Your post intrigued me! Does it perform really well with Big Sur?
I'm running a similar late 2009 Mac Mini (albeit with 2.26GHz), 8GB Ram and Crucial SSD with Mojave. Do you think it's worth upgrading to Big Sur or would I experience some loss of performance/slow-down?
Anyone else running a similar spec 2.26GHz Mac Mini with Big Sur?
You'd be shocked how much faster the 2011 MBAs are.For a seemingly underpowered piece of kit, this machine performs extremely well
You'd be shocked how much faster the 2011 MBAs are.
It's fun that whereas the i5 absolutely demolishes the C2D, the GeForce 320M is actually faster than the useless HD 3000.It's such a shame that I don't have a 2011 i5 2GB MBA to play around with...
That's something that always amazed me - comparing my 2010 13" MacBook and my 2011 11" Air, the Air would always cream the MB in anything that hit the CPU, but the MB always destroys the Air in GPU-heavy tasks. Shame the HD 3000 was "Eh, this is good enough I guess" to Apple.It's fun that whereas the i5 absolutely demolishes the C2D, the GeForce 320M is actually faster than the useless HD 3000.
The HD3000 (read: all Intel GPUs) is utter garbage. The only exception is Kaby Lake-G. Oh, wait...Shame the HD 3000 was "Eh, this is good enough I guess" to Apple.
that is awesome!
Part of the reason I hung on to PowerPC for so long was I was stuck on it. I couldn't afford newer Intel Macs (until they started coming into my price range). I had thoughts back in 2006 or so about a Hackintosh, but it seemed like a hard way to get a 'Mac'. I've never owned a system that was 'easy' to convert and this is one of those few times where if I was going to do this I would fork out the cash for a system that has the specs to do it well - not the really old 2002-2003 crap systems I had access to.that is awesome!
though it's not technically a "mac", i am going to be fixing up my old overclocked X58 6-core xeon PC as a mavericks hackintosh soon, so that i can have something intel to use some newer software on that the g5 quad can't run. will probably end up using it as my daily driver for a while since my windows 10 PC seems to be giving up the ghost.