I don't know the first thing about auto engineering, but I can get into a Chevy Cobalt and conclude that it is poorly designed because its crash test results are poor, it handles very sloppily, and has very light steering. I can also drive a Chevy Cruze and conclude that it has a much better design because it scores better on the crash tests and has tight handling and steering. User experience may be subjective, but what defines a product as successful in the marketplace is whether it is accepted by the market, and user interface is a big part of that.
If a program doesn't offer a good user experience to most people who try to use it, then it doesn't have a good design. It may have efficient programming and be capable of being a good program, but until the user experience issues are resolved for enough users, it is missing a key element of a good design.
Symbian fans will argue until their blue in the face about how superior the design of their OS is over iOS and Android. From a technical standpoint, perhaps they are right. But that doesn't really matter since the latter two are winning over the marketplace.
Again, none of which have to do with "Memory Leaks" and "Pounding CPU". Why are you purposely ignoring my point ? My point is again for you since you can't seem to grasp it : Don't use industry jargon to pretend your opinion is fact.
"Skype is more heavy on CPU use in my experience, causing heat issues that make the fans spin at max rpm" is a valid obversation, if you've actually bothered to observe it. "Skype leaks memory" isn't, especially if you don't know what a memory leak is.
You want to tell me that I rant on and on, and then you people that answer my posts always put words in my mouth I didn't say. Try to read and understand my rants if you want to answer them and maybe I won't have to post again and again in the same thread rehashing the same things over and over again. Simple concept ? Macrumors forums are such a poor user experience.