Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

firestarter

macrumors 603
Dec 31, 2002
5,506
227
Green and pleasant land
Is there any easy way for the close up lenses to tell which would be better to buy? A lot of people say you have to buy the EF 50mm f/1.8 II.

That's not a close-up lens. It's a prime (ie, non zoom) lens.

I see it is also pretty cheap. If I do buy that, what advantage does it have over the 18-55 kit lens?

It's faster - it lets more light in. That lets you increase shutter speed, or decrease ISO - so it can give you options to take higher quality photos.

It should be sharper than your zoom.

If you use it at f 1.8 or a similarly wide aperture and focus on something close up (say a portrait), then the background just beyond the subject will be out of focus. This can make pictures look almost 3D - it's a great effect.
 

HE15MAN

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 3, 2009
955
14
Florida's Treasure Coast
Just took these shots a few minutes ago with my newly learned skills. I think they are better!

IMG_2116.jpg


IMG_2102.jpg


IMG_2113.jpg


IMG_2133.jpg


IMG_2105.jpg
 

firestarter

macrumors 603
Dec 31, 2002
5,506
227
Green and pleasant land
They do look a bit sharper.

You're still shooting a 250mm lens at 1/320th though. To get properly sharp results you should rest the lens on the back of a chair, or get a tripod or monopod - since the shutter speed you're using is only just about getting sharp results.
 

HE15MAN

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 3, 2009
955
14
Florida's Treasure Coast
They do look a bit sharper.

You're still shooting a 250mm lens at 1/320th though. To get properly sharp results you should rest the lens on the back of a chair, or get a tripod or monopod - since the shutter speed you're using is only just about getting sharp results.

Yea it is tough. Those Indigo Buntings are just small birds.

BuntingIndigoM02.jpg
 

jampat

macrumors 6502a
Mar 17, 2008
682
0
So is that why with the kit lens, when I try to take close up pictures in AV mode, they all look like crap?

How close? Lenses have a minimum focus distance (it varies, but typically around 3' for short lens and 6' for a telephoto) inside this distance everything will be blurry. And in AV if the light sucks, with the kit lens, shutter speed may be dropping too low.
 

HE15MAN

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 3, 2009
955
14
Florida's Treasure Coast
They do look a bit sharper.

You're still shooting a 250mm lens at 1/320th though. To get properly sharp results you should rest the lens on the back of a chair, or get a tripod or monopod - since the shutter speed you're using is only just about getting sharp results.

Do these look any better to you?

Ahhh I am aggravated! I was lucky enough to be walking back from lunch, and see hundreds of birds flying around. I look and find one, and realize it is one of my favorite birds. This bird also is hardly seen, at least by me, in Florida! So I was ecstatic when I saw them right outside my office at work in a huge tree! After taking the photos in AV mode, I realize I had forgotten to swap my images over to Raw mode :(

IMG_2185.jpg


Waxwings2.jpg


Waxwings3.jpg


Waxwings4.jpg
 

jampat

macrumors 6502a
Mar 17, 2008
682
0
RAW wouldn't really help much with those shots. They are reasonably exposed and the white balance is decent. No advantage to RAW.

Just keep shooting and learning, don't get too caught up in the details.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.