The disliking of flash has it's reasons. Head over to any GNU/Linux or BSD-Forum and ask them about it. They told the same thing Steve tells years ago.
Flash is closed-source, you can't add features. As for the opensource community, it's just a pain in the arse. But if you revolutionize how people interact with the web (Multitouch vs. Point'n'Click/Drag'n'Drop), you are forced to abandon it. Besides, it's a resource monster. We are lucky that they replaced it with HTML5/CSS3 opensource-technology. If it were Microsoft, we had "ActiveX Touch" now, and all Safari/Firefox/Opera users would be screwed.
I'm rather pissed about the limited freedom at Apple in favor of some financial numbers. No white iPhone, OK - it may have technical reasons. But what about the black MacBook? Or aluminum Macs in the colors of the iPod? They show us that they can anodize it, but they don't. Using my iPhone on a different carrier? Tethering (instead of switching phones which you can do anyways)?
And now removing SIM-cards only to increase the possibility that you use the App Store because you can't switch phones. Didn't they make surveys to ask Sprint customers how they feel about the lack of SIMs? Bringing the worst feature of CDMA to GSM is not how it should be.
What about installing an SSD in my unibody MacMini? You loose the warranty. Even if they would offer that option as BTO, they could shove it. Paying twice for half the performance is not what I want, I want to put in there what ever I want. I guess they only made the RAM accessible because they had to. If they would have glued on the bottom door, Apple Care would see 95% of the RMA'd Minis with reattached doors.
Apples current model of acquiring parts doesn't work, because cheaper and better stuff hits the market while the stock in Shengzen is still full. Or have you seen the 750GB 2.5" hard drive yet? Available for at least 6 month to customers. Now we have some 2009 Toshiba SSDs in the MBA while SandForce SF-2000 (SATA-III, max. 500MBit/s read) will be sampled starting next week. SF-1200 are perfect for SATA-II, as they (barely) saturate the interface. Just stock up and and switch to SATA-III and SF-2000 in the future. What is Apple going to do with the SATA-III integrated in the next nVidia chipsets? Hook up 5400RPM notebook hard drives? Don't tell people that you build the best computers in the world then, rather concentrate on software.
While Apple still uses some 2009 Core2Duos because of Intel's chipset limitations, AMD provides the same instructions-per-watt, but per half the $ - and with no restrictions.
They have the same problems people in socialist Germany complained about, but being the heart of the American capitalism. Well, you had to wait for a car 18 years, now you wait for an iPhone 3 month. Let's hope it doesn't increase to 24 month of shipping time, by the date of arrival I'd have already switched to some inferior, but available phone.
As they don't wiretap me (yet) and throw me in jail for jailbreaking iOS devices, no, I'm not scared. But pissed for not allowing me to install non-approved aoftware on my $800 phone. Well, let's hope they don't come up with the Apple Party in the next elections. President Jobs would be pretty scary, though.