Yea being able to unscrew things and do this myself with the new MacBook 7,1 is a huge reason of why I bought it. It’s the most you can ask for in a sealed case laptop…
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So I Bought An Intel Mac…
- Thread starter alex_free
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Cool…I wouldn't have this laptop myself if it were not for work. But they gave it to me so it's what I've got to use for that. However, I work from home, so it does give me that freedom.
I've got one of my 30" Cinema Displays and one of my 24" Cinema Displays connected to it via a KVM switch and it's always in clamshell mode.
EDIT…
Last edited:
If you're willing to suffer teh horrors of DisplayLink, ie attach monitors via USB, then you can inexpensively have more than two externals on that MBP
Your comment reminded me that the active adapter I have for the 30" CD has a USB port. I forgot about that. So, just now ran a USB cable extender for the keyboard and mouse to that spare port.If you're willing to suffer teh horrors of DisplayLink, ie attach monitors via USB, then you can inexpensively have more than two externals on that MBP
That gives me my second USB port back (the Mac only has two). I'm using two KVMs (both Startech) and the one the 30" display is attached to is a SV231DD2DUA. If I can hook up the second 30" at full res that'd be great as the KVM currently has an empty port. The SV231DD2DUA I got precisely because it will handle the 30" resolution from both ports.
If you tell me that all I can manage is my second 24" CD then I'll probably pick up whatever adapter you mention just to have it, but won't hook it up. That's just because of the workflow I have where the second 30" would be useful, but the second 24" (which is vertical) would simply be there just because.
sorry to jump in but if you guys want upgradability, stability and great hardware.
Why not just get a Linux PC or a de-bloated Windows PC with no telemetry.
PCs nowadays have great hardware from CPUs, to GPUs and fast NVME drives.
Great displays like a 4k 10 bit HDR OLED displays exist in the PC world too.
An AMD 5950x or an even simple i5 11400 PC would totally destroy any Intel/M1 Mac.
Why not just get a Linux PC or a de-bloated Windows PC with no telemetry.
PCs nowadays have great hardware from CPUs, to GPUs and fast NVME drives.
Great displays like a 4k 10 bit HDR OLED displays exist in the PC world too.
An AMD 5950x or an even simple i5 11400 PC would totally destroy any Intel/M1 Mac.
This comment is kind of off-topic for the PowerPC or Early Intel Macs forum.
All good suggestions. But you may not have realized that you were replying to a thread inside the PowerPC Mac forums. We are all kind of partial to our PowerPC and early Intel Macs around here.
The 2009 white MacBooks are amazingly good. It is my hubs' system and can run 10.13 (modern web).
Officially in the early intel club now! Kind of ironic that chrome doesn’t support Windows 7, but Firefox does. Firefox doesn’t support Mac OS X 10.11, but chrome does. So using chromium for the moment until I reformat the HDD…
Welcome to the club. May early Intel give you many years of enjoyment and adventure as it has for me. Good computer to start with as well - that screen should be much better than some earlier Intel choices and still easy to work on. Seeing this thread has made me want to pull the trigger and finally pick up a plastic unibody MacBook...
To be honest, I think a 30" deserves way better than DisplayLink
I'd pick up a second MiniDisplayPort to dual-link DVI adapter and dual-link-capable KVM.That sounds awesome until you price it outTo be honest, I think a 30" deserves way better than DisplayLink
I can't - unless I want to be stuck on WiFi. Currently the second TB/MDP port is for my ethernet cable adapter.To be honest, I think a 30" deserves way better than DisplayLink
Now if DisplayLink does support the 30" I'd run with that still. I'm just not going to do it if it won't support the 30".
As for KVM, I have two separate boxes. The first one supports the 24" Cinema Display because it's got the lower resolution. The second one supports two 30" Displays - which is why I got it. I'm just not using the second port in the back of that KVM because I have no way to attach it to the work MBP.
PS. For the record: Left side of 2015 work MBP> Power, 2xTB, 1 USB. Right side of MBP, 1 USB, 1 HDMI. That's all the ports this Mac has.
Last edited:
Yeah, don't think this is going to work (DisplayLink). I'm finding USB devices that support the 30" display, but those aren't DVI. The max USB<>DVI support out there seems to be 2048x1536 and the CD is 2560x1600.
That means I'd have to use an adapter with one of these USB devices to convert from DVI to whatever this device is using and I don't think that's going to work.
That means I'd have to use an adapter with one of these USB devices to convert from DVI to whatever this device is using and I don't think that's going to work.
Remembering why I switched to FireFox (this was downloaded from the apple developer site)... Richard Stallman was right?
You can swap that for an USB 3.0 ethernet adapter, that's still more than enough for one gigabit per second - and your second TB/MDP will then be free for the second 30"
This surprised me! I’m reading around the net that it’s actually supported until 2022? Which I still find kind of nuts given Windows 7’s ~20% marketshare. Maybe it’ll be a boon for Firefox...
In a way, Firefox actually has better legacy macOS support too—Firefox 78 ESR, which gets security updates until October, supports OS X 10.9. (I’ve still migrated to Chromium Legacy though, because it’s required for full functionality in apps I need for work.)
Last edited:
It's an either or. The active adapter (Apple A1306) uses a TB/MDP port AND a USB port.You can swap that for an USB 3.0 ethernet adapter, that's still more than enough for one gigabit per second - and your second TB/MDP will then be free for the second 30"
So bothTB/MDP ports and both USB ports would be occupied.
That said, the adapters have USB ports in them so I could probably hook up a USB>Ethernet adapter. I was not aware they made those. I'll have to think about it. Don't know if I want to spend on a gamble this time.
Well…we'll see what happens. Ordered another A1306 and a Moshi 3.0 USB to Gigabit Ethernet adapter.
Worst case scenario I have adapters I can use with a different Mac. The Moshi has a passthru USB port so that means I'd still have one USB port remaining if this works.
Worst case scenario I have adapters I can use with a different Mac. The Moshi has a passthru USB port so that means I'd still have one USB port remaining if this works.
I suspect that the USB connector on the A1306 is just to power the DisplayPort->DL-DVI circuitry, which is why they can run the data lines through as a passthrough. If that’s the case, you should be able to plug both A1306’s USB connectors into a USB hub or a USB charger to give them power and keep at least one of your MacBook’s USB 3.0 ports free.
This would let you run your gigabit adapter at full USB 3.0 speeds rather than capping out at 480Mbps.
I’m not certain that this will work, but I figured it was worth mentioning since you have another A1306 on the way.
I have a spare powered USB hub in the garage. Normally it's connected to the Mini, but I pulled the Mini inside the house when things got hot. That's an option I'll try if passthrough doesn't work (work well). I just dropped $60 so I'm going to give it a few tries.