U can always tell digital only artists, they overwork everything. And digital art tends to look all the same, because of software limitations. Drawings look better with confident strokes. U only learn that by ruining lots of drawings. And if one is learning to draw- an undo button will become a crutch. I use digital because it's faster for commercial art. But is it better for art? No way. I would much rather use traditional rather than digital media. It's Much more affordable and enjoyable. Pencil and paper is cheap. So is water colors. I could paint for a decade for the cost of one iPad Pro. I have over a grand into mine, that's allot of art supplies.
The iPad pencil feels nothing like a real pencil. I use pencils everyday. And there is a digital disconnect and parallax with digital devices. iPad lacks an a analogue feel- Wacom does this much better- imo. The things holding the pro back is the software and low end hardware specs (fine for hobby drawing- lacking for commercial art). But not everyone needs full photoshop or sketchbook pro.
Drawing apps are far superior on Windows. But few really care or need those capabilities. Simplicity wins for hobby artists.
That said, iPad is one of the best digital drawing experiences. It's defiantly a little bit better than n-trig (surface) and almost was good as Wacom in my personal experience. The iPad is defiantly the best low end solution available, I just miss my favorite art programs.
I'm glad you find enjoyment in expressing yourself in a traditional medium and I respect you have your own view on the value of art and how it's produced.
I disagree with your views on the undo button being a crutch. It's a tool and it can be incredibly valuable learning how to draw. I don't think there is only "one way" to learn anything - it's a matter of what works best for the individual.
I also disagree with your view that traditional media is "better for art" then digital - not even from a technical PoV. What matters is the expression and impression created - not how it was created. Any artist will choose the best medium for them to express themselves and/or gain enjoyment. Art progresses by statement, not by technique.
Your statement on parallax (assuming you're talking about the iPad Pro and the Apple Pencil) is your own view. You are the first I've ever heard anybody complain about parallax with the Apple Pencil. It's something that has bothered me to no end with previous bluetooth iPad Pencils (to the point of being unusable), but personally I have not had this at all with the Apple Pencil. If I make the mark on the screen with an Apple Pencil, the mark shows up exactly where I expect it to - I wouldn't be able to use it otherwise.
I also disagree with your statement of "pro needs". I won't say much about this because the argument of "pro" has been done to death. I'll just say that people get too hung up on that term and become obsessed with having "pro" gear. It's not about the gear, it's about the output.
Lastly, I will ask you NOT to make snide assumptions about others. My background in art is with traditional mediums, so I know first hand how much art supplies cost. I MUCH prefer digital (for many reasons, not the least of which are cost, portability and it opens up new possibilities and options I didn't have before), but I don't think it's any better or worse than traditional mediums - it's just what the individual prefers. In the case of creating art (hobbiest or professional), as with everything, the right tool for the job is the right tool for the individual.
