I couldn't have said it better myself. If I was buying today, I would get the VAIO and wait for Apple to fix the present design back to the way it should be.
The speed of the VAIO is different from the youtube review. Sony's website has two versions, 1.73 GHz and 2.0 GHz. The 1.66 GHZ model must have been an early review machine. Then again, this latest all-in-one model hasn't been officially released yet.
Am I missing something here? What exactly has does Apple need to fix back to the way it should be that you would jock the Vaio AIO over the iMac???
Let's see, the Vaio:
Sits too low with zero height adjustment.
Glossy screen much glossier than the iMac.
Low CPU specs, tops of at 2.2 Ghz
Expensive without reason. Starts at $1899 @ 1.5 Ghz and tops of at $2899 @ 2.2 Ghz.
Much deeper footprint than the iMac.
No bluetooth.
Aesthetics clean but resembles a Windows Vista knockoff look.
Let's see the iMac:
Starts at $1199 @ 2.0 Ghz and tops off at $2299 @ 2.8 Ghz
Screen sizes 20" and 24"
Regal design for an entertainment system.
Glass overlay to protects LCD from families with small kids that like to touch everything.
Glossy screen not as saturated as the Vaio
Superior keyboard design
Aesthetically pleasing
24" can be mounted on the wall.
Built-in bluetooth
Slot load drive, nothing to break like a pop out drive.
Dual boot option.
Again, what exactly did Apple need to fix that Sony is doing right?