That's an interesting way to describe it. I've often said that there is potential for the feature on iPad (it does need a lot of work to actually make good use of the limited screen estate), but on the Mac it seems quite unnecessary when there are existing ways to multi-task.Stage Manager seems like a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. I fail to see a workflow where this makes my life easier.
No.I'd be interested to see how many of you are continuing to - or have dabbled with - Stage Manager.
I gave it a good go for about the first month after Ventura was released, but in all honesty I found it harder work trying to make it fit into my workflow. Plus it lacks some basic quality of life features.
Would love to hear your thoughts as I have a feeling that it will be left to rot, like Launchpad.
I think we saw the problem it was trying to solve when they introduced the Vision Pro. The implementation of Stage Manager makes a lot of sense if you are physically reaching out to grab a new space to work in. It is there to help ‘spatial computing’ feel more natural. As it is on a 2-D screen with space constraints, I find little use for it.I haven't even investigated Stage Manager. I don't know a single thing about it. Maybe it is indeed a solution in need of a problem to solve.
old thread. But actually you can just SHIFT-CLICK the iconized app on the left to merge into currently active stage (and drag individually to "release" from the stage).Stage manager has promises. But it needs improvement. Like, say if you option click when opening an app it should put it in the same screen as current window as opposed to in a new screen. Or it remembers that you paired two apps A and B together and next time you open B it will put it with A if A is already opened. Or how about a quick easy way to decouple an app and put it on its own screen
But I have a feeling this is another thing they half ass and never bother to refine. On to the next thing they can show off at wwdc
I'm still using it daily and agree with this. I love Stage Manager on macOS.I have been trying stage manager for few days (in MBA 15") and found that it's more easier to click icons on the left than on the task bar in the bottom. It's bigger and more intuitive (grouped); also you can click anywhere to minimize everything. The task bar in the bottom is mixed between active and unopened apps, while stage manager on the left are for active apps only.
I've given up on Stage Manager for my 2-screen Mac. It was OK, but the quirks ended up bugging me too much. I just manage windows manually again. Still liking it on my 11.5" iPad Pro though.I really like it on both Mac (two large monitors) and 11 inch iPad. Still using it since day 1. The Mac version could do with some refining. Don’t like it when calling up a Finder window on one screen and Finder windows come to the front on both screens. But I’d miss it if it was gone from the OS.
Same here. I've given it a try on my two 27" Dell Monitors driven by an M1 Mac mini. I think it would be more useful on a single screen IMHO.I've given up on Stage Manager for my 2-screen Mac. It was OK, but the quirks ended up bugging me too much. I just manage windows manually again. Still liking it on my 11.5" iPad Pro though.
And there is a toggle shortcut, buried in keyboard in sys settings, go to keyboard and find mission control and it's randomly in the mission control shortcuts, I reassigned it to Fn -1Yes, and loved it from the first minute I turned it on. I really like the focus it provides. I use multiple desktops on two large monitors for different purposes. The combination of that and Stage Manager is just great for me. One of those periodic big leaps forward that made me move to Apple gear years ago.