Windows is ABSOLUTELY better than Linux in regard to all of the major bullet points I listed, the same disadvantages Linux had in the late Nineties.So windows is better?
No operating system is perfect however Windows 10 is definitely a credible, relatively low maintenance environment that does not require scads of system administration hours.
Remember the good ol' days of bootloaders like GRUB or Lilo? Good times, good times.
Windows itself has come a long way in the past thirty years. Some versions were half-baked (Me, Windows 8), others have been excellent for their era vis-a-vis the alternatives.
Go to Best Buy and pick up the latest $50 HP OfficeJet MFP, take it home and set it up. On Windows & macOS, you just download the software, run the installer and you are done: copy, print, scan, fax. Oh, wait, HP thinks you should upgrade the device firmware. Easy with Windows and macOS.
macOS still has the lowest absolute system administration load of the three.
As mentioned above I come from a commercial UNIX background (mostly IRIX and Solaris). I know all about system administration load and yes there were about five years of overlap between my UNIX time and my Linux time. During that time, Linux certainly was NOT a cakewalk compared to commercial UNIX.
Hell, I tried FreeBSD just that era as well just to see if the grass was greener on the other side: it wasn't.
Yes, Linux has improved over time but so have all of the other major operating systems.
Note that I still use Linux after nearly a quarter decade of experience with it. It has its places and its strengths. But the desktop still is not one of them and likely will never be.
I get it that most Linux enthusiasts are upset when someone with long-time UNIX/Linux experience comes out strongly against Linux as an everyday desktop operating system and calls out every single major shortcoming with desktop Linux as well as the wisdom that these were the same exact sticking points over twenty years ago.
Last edited: