Why do people keep comparing the Surface Pro to a MBA when they run different software? Shouldn't it be compared to an Ultrabook or similar PC OEM hybrid device?
Dude...why do you get this way? Anyone that disagrees with your POV and you drone on endlessly...... So you can take pictures and video with your 11 inch MBA? C'mon stay on topic and at least admit when your wrong. The SP2 offers much more options and versatility than the MBA11. Just because you don't use them doesn't mean others won't. Just because you might not like something doesn't mean other share that like or dislike.
Works fine on my Yoga. In fact that's all I use in desktop or tablet mode.
Why do people keep comparing the Surface Pro to a MBA when they run different software? Shouldn't it be compared to an Ultrabook or similar PC OEM hybrid device?
And as I mentioned, a MBA can run both OS X and Windows. Can the Surface Pro do that?
Yes it is, and in my opinion, not a very good one. The best functionality offered by the SP2 is in the Desktop mode and to use it as a tablet in Desktop mode is awful. It's better when mimicking a laptop propped up using the stand and a keyboard cover, but not as good as a laptop itself would be. Either use, tablet or laptop, is subpar. Shuri said it best in his post:
Fine, where can I buy the Power Cover right now?
Well first you should double check the specs of the MBA as it comes with an i5, upgradable to an i7 CPU. And according to the Apple Store UK site, the base configuration costs £849 (i5 CPU, 4GB RAM, 128GB SSD). And if you insist the battery life is comparable with the Power Cover, you better include the price of that instead of the Type 2--likely at least £199. That makes the difference nearly £150, not insignificant.
I've acknowledged that's a check in the SP2's favor, but only if you need the stylus functionality--most don't.
I understand much of this is about preference and that certainly should take precedence for each individual buyer. The OP asked our opinion about these 2 devices right now (not in the future when they may/may not improve) and I offered mine. That all. You find more value in the Surface Pro 2, that's great, hope you're able to get one at a good price.
----------
Yes, you can install the desktop versions--absolutely horrid to use when using the SP2 as a tablet.
Seriously? No wonder these things aren't selling. Anyone spending $1200 on a Surface when you can get a much better built laptop with better specs for half the price is seriously on drugs.
Why do people keep comparing the Surface Pro to a MBA when they run different software? Shouldn't it be compared to an Ultrabook or similar PC OEM hybrid device?
snip
Personally I ditched both of them and use an Atom tablet. I can pop it into a keyboard setup and make it exactly like a laptop, plus I can use it as a tablet, touchscreen, use my stylus and Wacom digitizer to draw, take notes etc etc. It's lighter, thinner, at least the same battery life if not better at half the thinness/weight, with keyboard battery that can almost be double the battery life, etc etc.For my needs it trounces the Air soundly, and then some.
I know I've seen you mention it in other threads but mind reminding me which Windows tablet you're using? Contrary to much of my take on the SP2, I'm still intrigued by this setup and would like to get reacquainted with Windows, just haven't seen the right setup and don't want to spend too much. I think my expectations were pretty high regarding the SP2 because of it's price.
I have the Thinkpad Tablet 2. But wait a hot minute as new Baytrail tablets are being released, so far only a couple have made it into the wild. The newer Baytrail have much more powerful CPU and GPU setups. I'd say this holiday season is going to be a pretty awesome one for windows tablets.
The performance of the baytrail though is not really any match for a Core i5. Hence the cheaper price, it's a modern day netbook if you remember those?
Some benchmarks put it on par with an i3 processor. But I agree that the power is not as good as a core i5, but it's definitely NOT netbook powered. You are talking about the single core Atom processors that powered the original netbooks that were awful. The dual core cpu's on the clovertrail tablets were quite adequate to run most windows functions and programs. Baytrail is actually a pretty large evolution, Intel is not just simply throwing more cores at the problem. Baytrail benchmarks pretty nicely, it edges out the processor in the 2013 nexus 7 for example. Here is Baytrail running COD4 for a good example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUquWwt1Hd4&feature=youtu.be
Even in light of the above though, so what? What are you truly running on that tablet, or that 11" MBA that you need all that power for? Photoshop runs on my clovertrail tablet, although that's not large graphic files., and that's just one example I'm sure you might be able to make a case for very technical highly specific programs, but at that point chances are you are running a high powered laptop or desktop and not an ultraportable laptop or any tablet.
I agree with you...the Surface Pro 2 has to go a long way to replace my iPad as far as a tablet goes......and the MBA is not a tablet.It's a different usage scenario. If someone is buying a surface ONLY as a laptop replacement and NEVER to be used as a tablet, then you are 100% correct. Unfortunately situations are almost never black and white like that.
The surface is a poor laptop, and a semi-poor tablet. But the Air is not even a poor tablet, it's not a tablet at all and never will be. Depending on how you use your computer will dictate which device will be better for you.
Personally I ditched both of them and use an Atom tablet. I can pop it into a keyboard setup and make it exactly like a laptop, plus I can use it as a tablet, touchscreen, use my stylus and Wacom digitizer to draw, take notes etc etc. It's lighter, thinner, at least the same battery life if not better at half the thinness/weight, with keyboard battery that can almost be double the battery life, etc etc.For my needs it trounces the Air soundly, and then some.
----------
Don't forget that you can load Windows onto the MacBook Air, this is the only way I'd ever own one (and did own 3 of them in the past). I think it's a valid comparison, although it does get a bit weird since the surface is a sort of hybrid. But for the price/functionality/power I think it's a fair comparison for someone looking to spend in that 1k+ range.
Hello,
How are you?
I am not wanting to start a flame war here, but this is an honest question for a debate.
A lot of people online are comparing the iPad air with the surface Pro 2.
But since the surface runs a full os, I think it is closer in specs, price and function to the MacBook Air 11.
So this is my question. Do the features of touch and hybrid make the surface pro 2 a better device and a better purchase against the air 11?
Cheers!
Sadly, no, Chrome doesn't have a Metro equivalent. At least I couldn't find one.
What are you truly running on that tablet, or that 11" MBA that you need all that power for?
https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2762879?hl=en
Select "Relaunch Chrome on the desktop" or "Relaunch Chrome in Windows 8 mode" from the Chrome menu to pick how Chrome launches. It's still not great touch interface, but it is Modern/Metro.
For me both great devices, but I will return my SP2 and stick with my MBA because of quality of the paint and poor viewing angles
Well, Windows and Mac OSX is personal preference plus it is a fact a lot more works with Windows then OSX. The Surface is a tablet, not a laptop, would you call the Asus Transformer a laptop? An iPad with a Keyboard a laptop?
And I can compare battery life because again the quoted times are as I said, the Surface has an hour extra then the Air with it's Power Keyboard attachment.
And as for price, well, in the UK a 4GB 128SSD Surface Pro 2 with type 2 cover costs £908.99, a MacBook Air with a slower and less powerful Core i3 CPU, 4GB ram and 128GB SSD costs £929, so you pay pretty much the same for a less powerful Mac.
Maybe in the US your pricing is different? But I compare prices in my own country. And the 256GB Air with 8GB ram is £1109 with the core i3, the Surface with 256GB SSD and 8GB Ram and type cover is £1148.99, so again not much difference but you also get a Core i5 in all Surface Pro 2 computers with a higher clock speed.
And I haven't mentioned the SD card slot or Wacom Digitizer.
MacBook Airs have Core I5 processors, and not I3 regardless of whether it is an 11 or 13 in air, at least in this country. So it isn't a significantly less powerful computer at all...very much the same excepting clock speed which is 1.3 on the air vs 1.9 on the Surface Pro 2. The Surface Pro of course, has a touch screen, and stylus, as well as Windows OS, so if that is important to you, get the Surface Pro or now Pro 2. If battery life is important to you, and for most interested in a portable computer it is, there is no comparison...get the Macbook Air.
I prefer the Air 2013 over the Pro 2. Windows 8.1 is visually appealing, and quite functional, but Mac OSX is just much more elegant and enjoyable to use in my opinion. Also, the Air 2013 has better graphics and slightly higher battery life, most likely due to the lower screen res though.
Sadly, no, Chrome doesn't have a Metro equivalent. At least I couldn't find one.