there is actually a susan in our accounting dept šI need the 13" Pro to call Susan from accounting."
there is actually a susan in our accounting dept šI need the 13" Pro to call Susan from accounting."
It's counter intuitive for the majority of touch typists as their focus is on the display. Touchbar is another potential point of failure in the chain and naturally Apple's only solution is to replace the entire Logic Board as opposed to the just the Touchbar at significant cost.I use the Touchbar daily. Wonder why many on this site hate it.
Your opinion. I am not a touch typist. I am a look at the keyboard typist.It's counter intuitive for the majority of touch typists as their focus is on the display. Touchbar is another potential point of failure in the chain and naturally Apple's only solution is to replace the entire Logic Board as opposed to the just the Touchbar at significant cost.
That's why the Touchbar is so strongly disliked. Apple's implementation of a dynamic keyboard row is the best implemented to date, equally it has met the same demise as all it's predecessors. Somethings just dont need fixing, the Butterfly Keyboard & Touchbar should have never been implemented. The former was clearly unreliable, the latter more a gimmick than a tool.
FWIW I have a 13" M1 MBP and rarely use the Touchbar as it's faster to use shortcut keys or set up the GUI accordingly.
Q-6
Gaming or sustained heavy use on the Air, especially in a warm environment performance will plumet as that's the nature of passively cooled systems where CPU/SOC TDP exceeds the maximum capacity of the passive cooling solution.OP literally said hes going to be gaming on it so a fan is more of a requirement than a necessity.
The market & Apple have spoken, enjoy it while you can. M2 13" MBP is highly likely to be the last Mac with the Touchbar unless Apple releases an M3 variant.Your opinion. I am not a touch typist. I am a look at the keyboard typist.
Futureproofing, currently i think i wouldnt care much about sustained workloads,
In the future i can see myself gaming on it, or doing video editing, also the extra battery life seems nice.
Regarding storage space vs screen size, would you go for the 15" MBA 256 instead of the 13" MBA 512? They are also both the same price.
Not everyone needs more than 256... I get by with less than 100 easily.OP:
Those two models aren't directly comparable because of the SSD sizes.
If you're going to be using this as your "main computer", you need MORE THAN 256gb of SSD.
Sorry but light/slim/cheaper does not mean best; not even close. 14" and 16" MBPs are better in every regard except light/slim/cheap.Not everyone needs more than 256... I get by with less than 100 easily.
OP, get the Air! It's a beautiful device. The 13" Pro is designed only for businesses. Then, get the 15" Air and enjoy what I consider the best Mac Apple sells right now. Large screen, light/slim, cheap in apple terms, amazing battery and still powerful
The 14 & 16ā pros are not better in every regardā¦ theyāre expensive and heavy! Sure, more powerful, more ports and a better display. But now you can get a light version of those pros and save a good amount of money. Those who need the powerful pros will get them but the rest of us want that pro like device without wasting moneyā¦Sorry but light/slim/cheaper does not mean best; not even close. 14" and 16" MBPs are better in every regard except light/slim/cheap.
The statement that The 13" Pro is designed only for businesses also is simply untrue. Try playing games, for instance, and see how poorly an MBA compares to MBP. [And yes we all know Macs are not the best gaming devices. But nevertheless many folks do play games on them.
Always bought my Mac's with work in mind (O&G industry), equally with time on hands and a little imagination...Sorry but light/slim/cheaper does not mean best; not even close. 14" and 16" MBPs are better in every regard except light/slim/cheap.
The statement that The 13" Pro is designed only for businesses also is simply untrue. Try playing games, for instance, and see how poorly an MBA compares to MBP. [And yes we all know Macs are not the best gaming devices. But nevertheless many folks do play games on them.]
If referring to Doom 3 up to 4K...What is the difference in screen quality?
I dont want to hear your hate. You dont like the touch bar I get it. STOP trying to force your hate on others.The market & Apple have spoken, enjoy it while you can. M2 13" MBP is highly likely to be the last Mac with the Touchbar unless Apple releases an M3 variant.
Q-6
N.P. Much the same, other than the M2 Air has a slightly larger display. The 14" & 16" MBP's have better display technology, equally no Apple portable has a poor display nor has done for years.Sorry, I meant more in general, which machine has better display for general use? Is there difference in panel quality etc. In another thread someone claimed MBP13 display is better than MBA13.
Both being almost the same price, why should i go with the pro?
MBA 13" M2 16/512 ā¬1350 MBP 13" M2 16/256 ā¬1389
Sure.Both being almost the same price, why should i go with the pro?
MBA 13" M2 16/512 ā¬1350 MBP 13" M2 16/256 ā¬1389
Mark Gurman reports Apple's coming with an M3 13" MacBook Pro. The only hope is that Apple updates its design to make it fit in with the rest of the line. It would be better if Apple just put the regular M3 in the 14" MacBook Pro though.The market & Apple have spoken, enjoy it while you can. M2 13" MBP is highly likely to be the last Mac with the Touchbar unless Apple releases an M3 variant.
Q-6
Wouldn't be surprised as the 13" MBP is a big seller for Apple nor do I see a redesign on the cards. Apple just need to drop in the M3 SOC and they are good to go.Mark Gurman reports Apple's coming with an M3 13" MacBook Pro. The only hope is that Apple updates its design to make it fit in with the rest of the line. It would be better if Apple just put the regular M3 in the 14" MacBook Pro though.
I have a reasonably competent PC which takes care of my gaming needs. The M1 Mac is more a point of interest with a handful of titles that can be run natively. Given the current state of gaming on the Mac I personally wouldn't consider one primarily for gaming. As said there are simply better options at lower price points.Gaming on M silicon is a pain in the ass since you can't install windows via Boot camp and Mac OS offers only a hand full of games. Other route is to do virtualisation like Vine but involves too much tinkering
Instead I would recommend:
A 500ā¬ Lenovo legion with 1660Ti/3050
A steam deck if you don't need a windows laptop for other stuff
Gaming on Xbox cloud on your MacBook or straight on your Samsung TV/Monitor (models newer than 2022 AFAIK)
I tried all 4 options and I ended with the Xbox route as my time is limited.
Takes 10 seconds to start any game from the large library Xbox offers
once you spec up the mba, vs the pro base variant the price difference is only 50-100 bucks difference between 14 and 15 mba. when you spending 1500+ that price difference is negligibleThe 14 & 16ā pros are not better in every regardā¦ theyāre expensive and heavy! Sure, more powerful, more ports and a better display. But now you can get a light version of those pros and save a good amount of money. Those who need the powerful pros will get them but the rest of us want that pro like device without wasting moneyā¦
If you want to play games on a Mac, you should strongly consider a pro or max chip then. Apple doesnāt invest in the Touch Bar anymore and have clearly left it behind in terms of designā¦ both of which are cost saving measures so they can offer a device for business use. Iām not saying you canāt use the 13ā pro for games but that is not the purpose of this device
Both being almost the same price, why should i go with the pro?
MBA 13" M2 16/512 ā¬1350 MBP 13" M2 16/256 ā¬1389