Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There is nothing I do with Excel that I couldn't have done in Numbers instead
My experience with Numbers is that it starts to choke when you feed it too many columns with 32,000+ entries in them. Excel keeps chugging away even when you've got a lot of data to deal with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleRod
Old thread, I know. Can you offer any help for someone looking for this pivot table functionality on Numbers?
My only advise is use Excel. Numbers just doesn't have the feature set of Excel. Plus entering data into Numbers is painful at best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleRod
I do find Numbers a little more cumbersome to use but not quite sure whether it's Numbers or just because I've used Excel all of long adult life and it's hard to switch. Can you explain what you mean about entering data into Numbers is harder than entering data into Excel?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MyopicPaideia
If you are the rare in the office and you have to share exel with others, you can't use numbers.
It will not work out.
 
My only advise is use Excel. Numbers just doesn't have the feature set of Excel. Plus entering data into Numbers is painful at best.
Yeah, I'd like some concrete examples as well. I've actually found numbers superior in handling copied and pasted data from 3rd party sources such as tabled data sets from websites, for example, and it also handles UTF8 and UTF16 character sets much better than excel as well - no weird jumbled characters when exporting Nordic csv files from databases etc.

Have actually defaulted to opening csv files in Numbers even if I know I have to export out again as Excel for a client or something...
 
  • Like
Reactions: sracer
Yeah, I'd like some concrete examples as well.
concrete examples of what Numbers doesn't have?
The number of formulas that Numbers has vs. Excel. Pivot tables, VB support, I think those are pretty concrete. If you have to import an excel spreadsheet, you typically get a bunch of errors that xyz isn't supported in Numbers.

For basic or casual useage, numbers may be fine, though as I said, imo, entering data in Excel is much better then Numbers
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleRod and sracer
concrete examples of what Numbers doesn't have?
The number of formulas that Numbers has vs. Excel. Pivot tables, VB support, I think those are pretty concrete. If you have to import an excel spreadsheet, you typically get a bunch of errors that xyz isn't supported in Numbers.

For basic or casual useage, numbers may be fine, though as I said, imo, entering data in Excel is much better then Numbers
Just a point of clarification. Numbers DOES have pivot tables but they aren't called that in Numbers and i don't think Numbers converts pivots in an Excel sheet to whatever Numbers has.
 
concrete examples of what Numbers doesn't have?
The number of formulas that Numbers has vs. Excel. Pivot tables, VB support, I think those are pretty concrete. If you have to import an excel spreadsheet, you typically get a bunch of errors that xyz isn't supported in Numbers.

For basic or casual useage, numbers may be fine, though as I said, imo, entering data in Excel is much better then Numbers
Nope, was specifically replying to the "cumbersome data entry" point which I addressed in my initial reply to you. I find entering data, especially from 3rd party sources, much less painful in Numbers than Excel. So I asked for specific examples where you experienced data entry to be more cumbersome.

It is a bit strange to criticise Numbers (or any spreadsheet program) based on its ability to open files from, be compatible with, and export to different spreadsheet programs. Indeed it should be praised for being as compatible as it is...what I am trying to say is it should be judged on its own merits, not on how it interacts with other spreadsheet programs.

I'd also like to make clear that I am definitely not arguing that Numbers is superior to Excel overall, or should somehow take its place as the spreadsheet king. What I am asserting is that Numbers is much more capable than it is generally given credit for, especially if one takes the time and is willing to "re-learn" what they thought they knew through using a different spreadsheet program, such as Excel. Also through having used Numbers as my primary professional spreadsheet tool over the last several years, I have found that for the vast majority of users I have encountered, Numbers can just as easily produce the desired results as Excel. In the few cases I have run into where Numbers is lacking or insufficient, Excel doesn't seem to be the best tool either. A database solution would be vastly superior to both Excel and Numbers in a lot of these cases. However, and this is an obvious and big caveat - I realise that my experience is only my experience, and that it in no way do I consider it definitive. I am aware that the good old adage, YMMV, applies here in spades.

I just refer to my first post in this old thread. As @sracer has pointed out again, it's a different approach. In order to become "good" with Numbers, you have to be willing to discard a lot of the basic ways you think about a spreadsheet that you learned as an Excel user.

It's a lot like learning another language. Since the solution and method for data manipulation (or in the case of language, idea expression) is not only different in a specific instance, but also in its fundamental approach, you can't expect to directly or literally translate every solution seamlessly between the two. You have to be willing to learn the fundamentals of the program (language) in order to fully understand its subtleties and become proficient.
 
Nope, was specifically replying to the "cumbersome data entry"
Because you need to type and use the mouse, you cannot do everything on the keyboard. More robust keyboard shortcuts imo.
Also, Type Jan in a cell in Excel, I can drag that cell to fill out all the months. Type in 1,2,3 in adjacent cells, I can then drag the highlight cells and continue to create 4, 5, 6 in new cells.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleRod
Same here. I quite like Numbers, and prefer it by far. Next step would simply to go with R.
Yeah, I'll not disagree that Numbers does produce a nicer looking document, but I find that managing my spreadsheets, I'm much more efficient in excel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleRod
Type Jan in a cell in Excel, I can drag that cell to fill out all the months. Type in 1,2,3 in adjacent cells, I can then drag the highlight cells and continue to create 4, 5, 6 in new cells.
I'm not a power user of spreadsheets and didn't know Excel could do that. Just tried it - cool! Just tried it in Numbers and - cool! Works there too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MyopicPaideia
I'm not a power user of spreadsheets and didn't know Excel could do that. Just tried it - cool! Just tried it in Numbers and - cool! Works there too.
Odd, before typing my post, I verified that I couldn't do that in Numbers. Perhaps I have an older version of Numbers. Admittedly I stopped using Numbers by and large because it could not handle my excel spreadsheets - I got too many conversion errors.
 
Odd, before typing my post, I verified that I couldn't do that in Numbers. Perhaps I have an older version of Numbers. Admittedly I stopped using Numbers by and large because it could not handle my excel spreadsheets - I got too many conversion errors.
It is not obvious how to do it in Numbers and different than Excel. You have to grab that little yellow dot there and drag.

Screen_Shot_2017-04-17_at_6_54_50_AM.png
 
For me, the biggest deficiency in Numbers is the lack of the Excel feature, Auto Filter. It's really the only thing that keeps me hooked into Excel. It's just too many steps to filter a Numbers spreadsheet by typing in filter criteria in the Filter field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleRod
concrete examples of what Numbers doesn't have?
The number of formulas that Numbers has vs. Excel. Pivot tables, VB support, I think those are pretty concrete. If you have to import an excel spreadsheet, you typically get a bunch of errors that xyz isn't supported in Numbers.

For basic or casual useage, numbers may be fine, though as I said, imo, entering data in Excel is much better then Numbers

Numbers may not have VB but it does have AppleScript. Which is a similar scripting language that can actually be used with multiple apps, including Office. I have personally used it to construct some pretty massive spreadsheets pulling data out of a SQLite database. Which was populated with data from Mail. :)
 
Numbers may not have VB but it does have AppleScript. Which is a similar scripting language that can actually be used with multiple apps, including Office. I have personally used it to construct some pretty massive spreadsheets pulling data out of a SQLite database. Which was populated with data from Mail. :)
the only issue there is, AFAIK, it will only work on the Mac. I frequently need the spreadsheets to work seamlessly on windows, i.e., no applescript on windows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleRod
Well, you are like a girl always dating the wrong guy. Numbers is for pre school. Use Google Sheets, it is free, you can use it anywhere with an internet connection, you do not need to save AND you can download or upload in Excel format.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AleRod
I've been through them all: Lotus, Quattro, Symphony, Excel and now moving on to Pages. The only bug I've encountered in Pages so far is occasional strangeness when linking data between sheets.

More problematic, however is migrating XL sheets into Pages. It just trashes the formulas. Turns formulas into absolute values. Is it me or Pages that is screwing up?
I use Numbers exclusively and export to pdf. I dislike receiving documents such as .docx, .xlsx, .pages, .numbers, ect. I am at the end of the chain; I can understand why passing documents to different departments that have to do their magical updates / changes need to happen.

Whenever there is a formula involved I usually just write a quick web application that grabs the proper data and displays it in an organized manner.
 
Whenever there is a formula involved I usually just write a quick web application that grabs the proper data and displays it in an organized manner.

Sorry for the thread jack, but can you explain a bit what you mean here? I have no idea and am curious. :)
 
Sorry for the thread jack, but can you explain a bit what you mean here? I have no idea and am curious. :)
Instead of some obtuse perversion of formulas and hidden fields in excel, I just create a web application using HTML, CSS, JS to run locally or on a server that pulls data via JSON from the source, does all the calculations in JS and displays the results in a web interface, with or without the web chrome.

If I want to get really fancy (build for distribution), I package it all up in an electron.atom.io application:
https://electron.atom.io/

Much easier to distribute to users and much easier to handle complex calculations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weaselboy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.