It doesn't have a TV tuner per se.
What it might have is a handheld device that interacts with say..Comcast's new Guide.
Instead of holding the remote and scrolling through the guide all you need to do is use the device to look at the guide interactively then change the channel.
I agree 100% with Surely. By the way the OP started the thread, it was obvious they were implying they had an inside source and a photo, all of this to see what kind of attention they can stir up.Yikes.
You just don't get it.
I agree 100% with Surely. By the way the OP started the thread, it was obvious they were implying they had an inside source and a photo, all of this to see what kind of attention they can stir up.
OP, I agree with a lot of your predictions, and think (some) are very probable, but you should have stated from the start that these are YOUR predictions. At least then we could have said good job to you for taking the time to collect the patent info. most people are just too lazy, or simply don't has the time to do this, so your efforts would have been appreciated. But Instead, you used your marketing/writing "skills" to mislead people into thinking you didn't do this, because you had inside information. You even asked everyone if they had any questions, as though you had already seen the actual device.
I appreciate your info, and again, I think you have some good predictions. I just personally think it's more respectable to let people know "hey this is just my prediction/hypothesis". At least that way you're people won't question your reliability or think you're just trying to get attention.
Shirly, let me dignify that with a response...
Yay. Applecare heard my complaints and theyre going to replace it with no charge: all I had to do was say that there was no way I was going to pay $900 for a repair and I still had a year and a half of support left to call in and keep complaining. Hehehe.
Now heres hoping they hear my tablet requests!
Explain why there would be a TV tuner. Apple would lose tons of money through the iTunes store. It makes no sense at all. Having a TV tuner automatically gives access to local stations = free to use. Many of the top shows on the iTunes store are from local stations.
Also, I find it funny that you say anybody who thinks wired connection is better than wireless is wrong. Wireless first does not have the potential bandwidth of wired. Second, when doing wireless you lose a lot of data. Third, there are no high end headphones that are wireless (and I mean high end, not Bose). Show me frequency response charts that shows that wireless is as good or better than wired. Actually don't waste your time because you won't find any. Yes, wireless may be the future of many technologies, but wireless will just never trump wired in performance. Convenience, most definitely, but performance there is no comparison.
PS "Telivision" is spelt television; "seperately" is spelt separately;
PS "Telivision" is spelt television; "seperately" is spelt separately;
And it's not "spelt", it is "spelled".
On topic, I don't believe a TV tuner is a good idea. It would be a wired mess using a coaxial cable all the time.
Yes it is "spelt".
spelt
chiefly Brit. past and past participle of spell.
Oh, burn......
This thread is ridiculous.
I'll say it once and I'll say it again: the only thing aluminum is good for is making frying pans and foil wrap.
Yes it is "spelt".
spelt
chiefly Brit. past and past participle of spell.
Oh, burn......
This thread is ridiculous.
You are actually ridiculous. You are acting like he committed fraud. All he did was make a thread about a tablet interesting for a change. He has plausible suggestions.
Also, tearing apart someone's grammar is not cool. Some people are not native English speakers, some (like supergod) have an awkward keyboard, but it is still so rude to tear apart someone's grammar. If you can't understand it, ask, don't criticize. You need to Google some online/forum
courtesy.
Excuse me, but I wasn't criticizing someone's grammer. I was correcting someone who was incorrectly criticizing someone else's spelling. I happen to agree with you- as long as what is typed can be understood, there is no need to call someone out on grammar/spelling. Maybe you should direct your venom at triscuitbiscuit and belvdr.
And as for supergod...... I've said my piece about the way he misrepresented himself for the first half of this thread.
I don't believe I have ever seen anyone write it that way past 3rd grade. In the business world, I've never seen it written that way.
That's fine, throw it at me. I was just being sarcastic anyway.
I guess it depends on where you do business.
You're a horrible, horrible person.
Globally, including England. It is common practice to spell words in the way it is accepted by most. So, in this case, using "spelled" seems accurate to more people than spelled.
You're not so good yourself!