I think many were aware it was a hamstring injury but not how severe it was and in interviews when pressed on the matter Egypt's manager kept on downplaying how serious the injury was, possibly due to not wanting to give the teams rivals an edge because if their rivals were to know the extent of Salah's injury and how long he would be out for, they could plan their team accordingly, giving them an advantage.Storm in a teacup. Mo tore his hamstring playing for Egypt in the AFCON. It happens. He’s returned to rehab with Liverpool’s medical staff to get him back into shape to play football for Egypt and Liverpool as soon as possible.
What people want and the rate at which muscle tissue heals are two unrelated things. Unless Liverpool are lying about rehabbing him (for what purpose?) all the alleged furore over it is just noise for clicks.
I have to admit, if I was a rival team manager, knowing one of Egypt's best players was going to be out for nearly the rest of the tournament would be perfect because knowing he would not be facing my team, I would be able to set the team up differently, possibly better due to knowing Salah would not be in the Egypt team. It would make such a huge phycological advantage. Well I think it would, hence why I can understand Egypt's manager frustration at Klopp telling the world just how bad Salah's injury is