Little planes, big planes, little planes- An interesting story is the transition to building larger commercial aircraft. Not really a story, just an observation.
B747
As commercial aircraft grew in size post WWII, the
Boeing 747 was a huge hit in the 1970s. At the time, Boeing was the predominant commercial aircraft builder. Then along come Airbus a European consortium that produced highly successful narrow body, the
A-320 and
A-330 wide bodies.
Outstanding airplanes, but then Airbus took on it’s mega project, the
A-380 (
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A380) to compete with the 747. They had many orders lined up from package carriers like FedEx and UPS, but ran into serious problems and delays with electrical issues.
A380
Quote from link:
Initial production of the A380 was troubled by delays attributed to the 530 km (330 mi) of wiring in each aircraft. Airbus cited as underlying causes the complexity of the cabin wiring (98,000 wires and 40,000 connectors), its concurrent design and production, the high degree of customisation for each airline, and failures of configuration management and change control.[
I called it a stray tron issue, but the result was 100s of orders were cancelled, and Boing who at one time planned a full double decker 747, decided instead to focus on smaller aircraft designs. Only certain airports could accommodate them, and everything with them took longer, longer to prepare, longer to board and deboard, and having a 500 seat capacity means you need an adequate boarding area and that many people who wanted to fly to a location.
At that point in time airlines at least in the US were prioritizing frequency (more flights) with smaller aircraft, and seemed to go overboard. More on this in a minute. Boeing came up with the
Dream Liner a smaller widebody (compared to the A380) and I thought they were yet again brilliant. Alas Boeing ran into it’s own technical issues as delays caused many order cancellations including at NWA.
https://www.cnet.com/news/boeings-787-dreamliner-a-legacy-of-delays/
Dreamliner
In the US, with the focus on frequency, I really disliked the substantial move to much smaller 50-70 seat aircraft that were not nearly as spacious, using aircraft that were originally designed for short flights, now being used for 3 hour + flights in cramped quarters.
For international flights wide bodies still offer the best solution. We flew to Hawaii in a
B-757 from Minneapolis and hated it. Too long of a flight with not enough space and that was in first class. Yet, I question the overall convenience of a 500 seat aircraft for reasons previously mentioned. It’s the same reason I prefer a 1200 passenger over a 4000 passenger cruise ship.
[doublepost=1532356251][/doublepost]
I have the great fortune of being able to hang out with a Hustler pilot every month or so. He's got some amazing stories - what an airplane!
I believe the
Hustler and the (OMG)
SR-71 were cutting edge technology in their times. I saw the latter in Okanowa (1980s timeframe) taxi by and then takeoff. Impressive to watch.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_SR-71_Blackbird