Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I swapped the engine on my '87 Shelby Lancer. It was a 2.2L SOHC Turbo with the Shelby "Turbo II" engine, but is now 16v DOHC with the Maserati 2.2L turbo engine. There's a YouTube video of me starting it up for the first time a few months back.

Also got myself a new project car; a 1986 Dodge Omni GLH Turbo
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0148_Fotor.jpg
    IMG_0148_Fotor.jpg
    474.1 KB · Views: 132
  • Like
Reactions: D.T.
It's shiny compared to the matte OEM? Apart from the grooves, of course. I don't know why Ford ditched the body color rear diffuser. It looks a hell of a lot better than plastic.

Exact same finish, it's the OEM part just without the alignment holes for the rear badge.

The diffuser is just a design shift, happens all over the industry - plus, painted panels in debris areas: side skirts, rear diffusers, are so prone to damage, I kind of prefer a more durable surface (my diffuser _is_ painted, it's just black :D)


Apologies, I did edit my post, because I researched what you were referring to before you responded.

Regarding your modification, it's the little details that make the big differences with cars. I do like the Coyote badge, it will look good on your black car. I meant to ask, do you have an exhaust set up on your 2016?

Oh yeah, no sweat. I'm running a Solo II cat-back, Thunder series (the mid sound level option), it's a very unique exhaust system - modular mid-muffler section (to go louder, quieter), tips mounted on ball joints for alignment - no rear cans, it uses J-pipes for noise cancellation, so no/low drone, but a nasty (in the best possible way) sound at WOT. Everyone that's heard it, loves it :)
 
@iTurbo

Wow, and VW didn't sue over that??[/QUOTE]

Nope! The Omni has been around since '78, but obviously the Rabbit has been around since about '74. They look alike, but don't share any components at all. And an Omni GLH Turbo would blow the doors off a mid 80s VW GTI anyway!

Here's the new engine in the Shelby Lancer. The Maserati 16v DOHC is very......Euro. Not a bad thing though....it breathes like a mofo compared to the Chrysler based Shelby engine.

mmmmmm fresh black wrinkle powder coating.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0075_Fotor.jpg
    IMG_0075_Fotor.jpg
    359.1 KB · Views: 93
  • Like
Reactions: D.T.
@puma1552. Any recommendations for modifications? Did you add anything specific to your 14 GT in terms of aftermarket? What are your thoughts on the Cervini Hood? I'm in complete planning mode for the Spring.

This is a stock photo, however; I plan on ordering this next week after the holiday, it's the Cervini hood for the GT. It just looks stellar on this body style. It's actually rather affordable, but the labor and paint job from the body shop will cost almost more than the hood itself.


View attachment 744610

Honestly the '14 GT was so excellent as it was that I didn't feel the need to do anything other than that GT500 exhaust. To each their own on that hood but the stock hood was plenty beefy since it basically looked like a cowl hood and had the functional heat extractor vents. That said the aluminum stock hood is known to corrode at the front seam underneath, typically right above the headlights. Ford has a TSB for this. I had mine done at the very end of the warranty and the dealership did a truly flawless job on the repair.

If I were to have to anything though, I would've gone with the Ford Racing Performance Parts tune. Have an FRPP dealer install it and your warranty will remain intact. Won't increase peak torque much, but will completely flatten the curve so you'll have peak torque everywhere. More conservative than other tunes, but would've been plenty for me and the warranty peace of mind is invaluable. Don't want to be grenading cylinder #8 with a crummy Bama tune and have a $10k engine replacement bill.

Otherwise if I were you I might look into a brake/suspension upgrade - the Brembos were fantastic so you might see if you can get a take-off kit from someone who wants to go all out with aftermarket brakes on their track pack car. Or, get the stock strut tower bar (came standard on all cars with 19" wheels, track pack or not - if a car had 19" accessory wheels, it got the strut tower bar).
 
I swapped the engine on my '87 Shelby Lancer. It was a 2.2L SOHC Turbo with the Shelby "Turbo II" engine, but is now 16v DOHC with the Maserati 2.2L turbo engine. There's a YouTube video of me starting it up for the first time a few months back.

That's very cool. Back in the day, I had a Daytona with the ubiquitous 2.2L turbo.
[doublepost=1514853484][/doublepost]
If the G isn't an SUV then what is it? Even Wikipedia says it is a mid-size four-wheel drive luxury SUV.

The manufacturer does too :D

upload_2018-1-1_19-37-58.png
 
Honestly the '14 GT was so excellent as it was that I didn't feel the need to do anything other than that GT500 exhaust.

Thanks for your feedback. I remember you mentioning the GT500 exhaust from Your previous post, which I actually contacted the previous owner of my GTCS Mustang to get some back history on the vehicle and he installed the GT500 exhaust mufflers and was not happy with the sound, then converted over to the Roush axle back mufflers/upgraded exhaust piping, which sounds very aggressive.


To each their own on that hood but the stock hood was plenty beefy since it basically looked like a cowl hood and had the functional heat extractor vents. That said the aluminum stock hood is known to corrode at the front seam underneath, typically right above the headlights. Ford has a TSB for this. I had mine done at the very end of the warranty and the dealership did a truly flawless job on the repair.

I heard about the corroding possibility with the aluminum stock hood, which from my readings, seems to happen around between 30,000 -50,000 miles. My GTCS only has 12,000 miles on it and has only been through a few summers, but it's good to know that Ford recognized the issue if it does occur. If I purchased the Cervinis hood, at least it would eliminate any concerns with the corroding.

What I don't like about my hood, is the white track stripes that go down both sides of it. Those need to go in my opinion, as I want the car to look uniform primarily being black, which I don't mind the track stripes going along the base of the passenger and driver side door area, which don't stand out as much.

Cervinis is a fairly reputable company and they make a great product. I do like the extractors that are built into the Mustang in my hood, but the new hood would also include extractors and the rising front nostrils. Which I think this hood is fairly aggressive more so over the stock hood and allows me to give it more of a unique touch to it.


IMG_0452.JPG


If I were to have to anything though, I would've gone with the Ford Racing Performance Parts tune. Have an FRPP dealer install it and your warranty will remain intact. Won't increase peak torque much, but will completely flatten the curve so you'll have peak torque everywhere. More conservative than other tunes, but would've been plenty for me and the warranty peace of mind is invaluable. Don't want to be grenading cylinder #8 with a crummy Bama tune and have a $10k engine replacement bill.

I'm not too familiar with the Ford racing tune for the Mustang, and all the forums I have visited doesn't seem to be a tune that others comment on. According to the recent owner, The Bama tune it has now was actually installed by a performance shop that I use as well outside my city (Which is the only Tuning shop within a 150 miles of the next one), and has a very high reputation with their service and experience. (Which they tend to be more discreet with tuning specs).

Being this is a summer car only, I'm not really too concerned about the warranty with my Bama tune, nor do I drive my cars hard either.

Also, The performance shop owner I know where the tune was installed has a GT500 and 2015 GT, has both of his Bama tuned. I actually had my Impala SS and 17 SHO Tuned there as well.

Don't want to be grenading cylinder #8 with a crummy Bama tune and have a $10k engine replacement

First, it's important know the source of the tune. I'm not sure what you know about Bama tune, however is a reputable company and through car shows I have been through the years, this seems to be with a preferred tune by various Mustang owners. Bama customer service is rated positive, which is important in the tuning Industry.

Which leads me to my next point:

Tunes are ubiquitous, but what makes a "Good tune" is knowing the 'Professional' (And shop) who is actually working on your car. I don't care what type of tune it is, if it's from Livernois, Cobb, Lund, Ford etc. Calibration and specification is everything when it comes to a tune. And then you need to know that the shop actually warranties their work if something does go wrong. Every shop is different, but it's crucial to know who is tuning your car and the car owner is comfortable with the tune and understands it.

Upcoming modifications:

1.) Researching Roush Supercharger
2.) Suspension
3.) Hood
 
Last edited:
Exact same finish, it's the OEM part just without the alignment holes for the rear badge.

The diffuser is just a design shift, happens all over the industry - plus, painted panels in debris areas: side skirts, rear diffusers, are so prone to damage, I kind of prefer a more durable surface (my diffuser _is_ painted, it's just black :D)
Got it. Oh, I knew that but I'd have thought using Xpel or other body protection film would work. I've seen F-Types with a painted diffiuser and ones without it and it's either shiny plastic or matte. I don't know the different and never saw an option for it on their online configurator. I think either black plastic or painted plastic looks great, but it's up to the owner to see what works for them.

Personally, I think painted looks great, but it would drive me insane when it came to scratches or chips in the paint due to road debris. The cheapest option would probably be finding very thick vinyl in a color of your choosing, probably red given your car's theme, and using it on the diffuser which is probably held in place with bolts. I've read people do that and then manage to get a clear layer on top, but I'd be worried about warping or bubbling between the two layers.
 
Some people buy for the name. Others like to know more about the car.

No idea about the diesel G. The G wasn't popular up until six years ago, when the Range Rover was dethroned as the go-to high end SUV. Personally, I think both are hideous. The new Range Rovers look like lumpy blokes who got clocked.

I'm not a fan of either GLC. I always thought the GLK, its predecessor, looked better. In traffic, if you saw a GLK, it looked like a poised cat waiting to strike its prey. Furthermore, whoever at MBZ thought that coupe SUVs should be made, should be dragged out back and shot.

I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment.
 
I believe Mercedes-Benz has shown a preview of the new G-Class SUV just a few days ago. It's probably still based quite a bit on the old model but there may be accommodations to eventually support an all-electric drivetrain (per M-B's practice now with new and future models).
 
Ah, thanks for stopping by. Did you get the issues with your E order cleared up?

Yes, for the most part. The car was finally delivered in September and has been a pleasure so far. My experience with Mercedes dealers however, has left a sour taste. Believe it or not, I had more success getting in touch with the UK Mercedes twitter account than my local dealer.
 
Yes, for the most part. The car was finally delivered in September and has been a pleasure so far. My experience with Mercedes dealers however, has left a sour taste. Believe it or not, I had more success getting in touch with the UK Mercedes twitter account than my local dealer.
MBZ or really any dealer behave as their own entity. That's the sad fact. Glad to hear you're enjoying the car.
 
Hah. Somehow it grabbed me. :p

One of my favorite things from the movie: a superhero with the power of invisibility ... but only when no one is looking at him :D
[doublepost=1515258943][/doublepost]"It worked, their clothes are shrinking!"

"I think my pants are shrinking ..."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn
Thanks for your feedback. I remember you mentioning the GT500 exhaust from Your previous post, which I actually contacted the previous owner of my GTCS Mustang to get some back history on the vehicle and he installed the GT500 exhaust mufflers and was not happy with the sound, then converted over to the Roush axle back mufflers/upgraded exhaust piping, which sounds very aggressive.




I heard about the corroding possibility with the aluminum stock hood, which from my readings, seems to happen around between 30,000 -50,000 miles. My GTCS only has 12,000 miles on it and has only been through a few summers, but it's good to know that Ford recognized the issue if it does occur. If I purchased the Cervinis hood, at least it would eliminate any concerns with the corroding.

What I don't like about my hood, is the white track stripes that go down both sides of it. Those need to go in my opinion, as I want the car to look uniform primarily being black, which I don't mind the track stripes going along the base of the passenger and driver side door area, which don't stand out as much.

Cervinis is a fairly reputable company and they make a great product. I do like the extractors that are built into the Mustang in my hood, but the new hood would also include extractors and the rising front nostrils. Which I think this hood is fairly aggressive more so over the stock hood and allows me to give it more of a unique touch to it.


View attachment 744835



I'm not too familiar with the Ford racing tune for the Mustang, and all the forums I have visited doesn't seem to be a tune that others comment on. According to the recent owner, The Bama tune it has now was actually installed by a performance shop that I use as well outside my city (Which is the only Tuning shop within a 150 miles of the next one), and has a very high reputation with their service and experience. (Which they tend to be more discreet with tuning specs).

Being this is a summer car only, I'm not really too concerned about the warranty with my Bama tune, nor do I drive my cars hard either.

Also, The performance shop owner I know where the tune was installed has a GT500 and 2015 GT, has both of his Bama tuned. I actually had my Impala SS and 17 SHO Tuned there as well.



First, it's important know the source of the tune. I'm not sure what you know about Bama tune, however is a reputable company and through car shows I have been through the years, this seems to be with a preferred tune by various Mustang owners. Bama customer service is rated positive, which is important in the tuning Industry.

Which leads me to my next point:

Tunes are ubiquitous, but what makes a "Good tune" is knowing the 'Professional' (And shop) who is actually working on your car. I don't care what type of tune it is, if it's from Livernois, Cobb, Lund, Ford etc. Calibration and specification is everything when it comes to a tune. And then you need to know that the shop actually warranties their work if something does go wrong. Every shop is different, but it's crucial to know who is tuning your car and the car owner is comfortable with the tune and understands it.

Upcoming modifications:

1.) Researching Roush Supercharger
2.) Suspension
3.) Hood
That image looks great.
 
How do manufacturer's lease specials work? They are typically for stripped base models which I don't want. If I get a loaded version, is the new lease payment proportionally higher, based on the increased retail price? (Or are the special terms off the table)
 
I swapped the engine on my '87 Shelby Lancer. It was a 2.2L SOHC Turbo with the Shelby "Turbo II" engine, but is now 16v DOHC with the Maserati 2.2L turbo engine. There's a YouTube video of me starting it up for the first time a few months back.

Also got myself a new project car; a 1986 Dodge Omni GLH Turbo
I had one of these and want another, nice score
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.