Wow. As someone previously mentioned I continue to be blown away about the mis-information regarding plasmas. I work in the industry and actually distribute both LCD & Plasma TV's to all of the major retail chains. Not all chains are direct with the mfg's by the way.
I own both technologies..each has its purpose. As a main viewing TV for sports, movies and even regular TV...plasma is the way to go. One real advantage of the LCD is they are less reflective...so if your room has LOTS of direct sunlight an LCD might be the better case. My suggestion, get some blinds!
1) Plasmas are far superior in regards to image quality & motion.
2) LCD's have poor response times. Have you ever seen a plasma TV advertise the response rate? No, thats because its like .003ms. The best LCD's are 4ms! Also, LCD's talk about 60, 120 and now even 240htz. Do you know what plasmas are? 460htz!
3) Burn in?? Please. It is not impossible, but highly unlikely. You would have to leave the TV on with a static image for like 48hrs+ straight. I play video games on my 50" plasma all the time. No problems.
4) Cost. Not sure where anyone got the idea that LCD's are cheaper. Inch for inch a plasma is generally always less expensive than LCD. Compare any 50" plasma from Panasonic, Samsung or Pioneer with an equivalent size LCD and 9 out of 10 times the plasma will be less money.
5) Heat. Yes plasma runs a touch warm. But nowhere as warm as I have heard advertised. I can stand next to mine and dont really notice any "heat" coming off of it. Is it warm yes...but compared to my Yamaha amp..now that puts out some heat.
6) Energy. Yes plasmas draw more power. However, each new generation of plasma has dramatically decreased the power consumption. In fact the next generation of Panasonic plasmas draw as much power as current model LCD's from Sharp. Also, for you eco freaks out there. Plasma TV's from Panasonic (not sure about the others off the top of my head) contain ZERO lead or mercury. LCD's can not claim that.
Man, I must sound like a plasma homer. I'm really not, I just get going when I hear the trash about plasma. Again, I do own a couple of LCD's, they are just not my main viewing TV's.
For those that remember the Beta vs. VHS days. Remember which was the better technology?? Beta was. Which format won? VHS. The superior technology does not always win the battle.
Lastly, as a previous poster mentioned. 720p is AWESOME when connected properly and viewing HD content..even blu-ray. If you are sitting 8 to 10 feet away you will never be able to tell the difference between 720p or 1080p. I see them all the time side by side. It is extremely difficult to tell the difference even close up. When you get back to a normal viewing distance it is next to impossible. Also, have you ever considered what is available in 1080p? The only programing available in 1080p is blu ray DVD. The current cable or even satellite providers do not have enough bandwidth to broadcast 1080p. If you're going larger than 50" I might consider 1080p more...but again...You can only take advantage of that with blu ray DVD's. 720p content displayed on a 1080p panel is exactly the same as 720p content displayed on a 720p panel.
I own both technologies..each has its purpose. As a main viewing TV for sports, movies and even regular TV...plasma is the way to go. One real advantage of the LCD is they are less reflective...so if your room has LOTS of direct sunlight an LCD might be the better case. My suggestion, get some blinds!
1) Plasmas are far superior in regards to image quality & motion.
2) LCD's have poor response times. Have you ever seen a plasma TV advertise the response rate? No, thats because its like .003ms. The best LCD's are 4ms! Also, LCD's talk about 60, 120 and now even 240htz. Do you know what plasmas are? 460htz!
3) Burn in?? Please. It is not impossible, but highly unlikely. You would have to leave the TV on with a static image for like 48hrs+ straight. I play video games on my 50" plasma all the time. No problems.
4) Cost. Not sure where anyone got the idea that LCD's are cheaper. Inch for inch a plasma is generally always less expensive than LCD. Compare any 50" plasma from Panasonic, Samsung or Pioneer with an equivalent size LCD and 9 out of 10 times the plasma will be less money.
5) Heat. Yes plasma runs a touch warm. But nowhere as warm as I have heard advertised. I can stand next to mine and dont really notice any "heat" coming off of it. Is it warm yes...but compared to my Yamaha amp..now that puts out some heat.
6) Energy. Yes plasmas draw more power. However, each new generation of plasma has dramatically decreased the power consumption. In fact the next generation of Panasonic plasmas draw as much power as current model LCD's from Sharp. Also, for you eco freaks out there. Plasma TV's from Panasonic (not sure about the others off the top of my head) contain ZERO lead or mercury. LCD's can not claim that.
Man, I must sound like a plasma homer. I'm really not, I just get going when I hear the trash about plasma. Again, I do own a couple of LCD's, they are just not my main viewing TV's.
For those that remember the Beta vs. VHS days. Remember which was the better technology?? Beta was. Which format won? VHS. The superior technology does not always win the battle.
Lastly, as a previous poster mentioned. 720p is AWESOME when connected properly and viewing HD content..even blu-ray. If you are sitting 8 to 10 feet away you will never be able to tell the difference between 720p or 1080p. I see them all the time side by side. It is extremely difficult to tell the difference even close up. When you get back to a normal viewing distance it is next to impossible. Also, have you ever considered what is available in 1080p? The only programing available in 1080p is blu ray DVD. The current cable or even satellite providers do not have enough bandwidth to broadcast 1080p. If you're going larger than 50" I might consider 1080p more...but again...You can only take advantage of that with blu ray DVD's. 720p content displayed on a 1080p panel is exactly the same as 720p content displayed on a 720p panel.