You'll be able to get the 460 working with that chipset, the only problem for me is running x99 you need two cards to get the latest ati cards running. SO far I just have a Nvidia 710 I think I'll delete the Nvidia drivers and just run the bare basic apple drivers and then run a 480 as my "main" card.... it's all a bit untested at the moment so be patient
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Hackintosh Thread
- Thread starter lowendlinux
- WikiPost WikiPost
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
- Status
Yes, as garnerx stated, it's quite obvious when you don't have acceleration. Another way to tell is by looking at the Dock. Usually, it has a gray background. When there's no acceleration, the Dock's background is white.
Well, after six years I ordered for the first time a new computer, to be exact a Core i7 7700K CPU and this nice Mini-ITX board with Thunderbolt 3 and full of other connectors: http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/Fatal1ty Z270 Gaming-ITXac/index.asp , 32 GByte DDR4-2400-RAM and a PSU cooler.
I already have all other components (SSD's, PSU, Mini ITX Case 'Cooler Master Elite 130', Nvidia GPU etc), so it wasn't a big investment.
It's meant to be a Windows machine first, but I will begin with the hobby 'Hackintosh' when macOS starts support for Kaby Lake, building the xMac Apple never released.
I already have all other components (SSD's, PSU, Mini ITX Case 'Cooler Master Elite 130', Nvidia GPU etc), so it wasn't a big investment.
It's meant to be a Windows machine first, but I will begin with the hobby 'Hackintosh' when macOS starts support for Kaby Lake, building the xMac Apple never released.
Welcome to the club!
Kaby Lake is still a bit new, but most of the major things are already working. It may not be as easy as setting up a Skylake system, but with a bit of work, you should be able to, at the very least, get very functional macOS system.
I suggest you start by reading the progress made here:
[NEW / TESTING] Intel 7th Generation Kaby Lake CPUs + 200 Series Motherboards in macOS | tonymacx86.com
Platform Trust sounds like it has something to do with Trusted Platform Modules. I'm not sure, but I think you'll want to leave that disabled. It might not matter, especially since, as far as I know, OS X doesn't support TPMs.
So...after years of waiting for even a hint that a high-performance Mac desktop sans monitor was coming, I threw in the towel. I built an i6700K/32GB/ASUS mATx/SSD (multi)/GTX 950 hackintosh. I hadn't built a machine since my pre-Apple days in the late 1990s. I figured if my hackintosh build was unsuccessful, I would cringe and go over to the dark side. Fortunately, I now have a "gold build" in Sierra 10.12.3 with everything (USB, Audio, Video, iMessage, etc) functioning perfectly -- I was very surprised! It took about 10 hours of construction, install and debug time.
Lightroom and Photoshop are my heavy uses (42 megapixel RAW images). I was getting by with a late 2014 27" Retina i5 iMac with fusion drive. I was pretty shocked by the performance delta:
(late 2014 i5 iMac vs i7 Hackintosh):
Geekbench 4: 11,250 vs 17,400 (before overclocking)
Cinebench 15 Rendering: 85 fps vs 116 fps (with a budget placeholder video card)
Import 10 RAWs to LR and convert to DNG: 58s vs 15s (!)
Export 10 full sized JPGs from RAWs: 74s vs 33s (!)
I was amazed by the Lightroom difference. I'm sure the SSD helped a bit, but the rendering times are amazingly better. I suspect the Nvidia GTX card helps a lot more than the AMD m290x, but I may do some more testing on that front. I double checked all of my settings as well. Anyway, all I know is it's a lot faster and that's very helpful.
I have no illusions that this will require a fair bit of maintenance, but I'm very comfortable with that. And....I have lots of backups!
Lightroom and Photoshop are my heavy uses (42 megapixel RAW images). I was getting by with a late 2014 27" Retina i5 iMac with fusion drive. I was pretty shocked by the performance delta:
(late 2014 i5 iMac vs i7 Hackintosh):
Geekbench 4: 11,250 vs 17,400 (before overclocking)
Cinebench 15 Rendering: 85 fps vs 116 fps (with a budget placeholder video card)
Import 10 RAWs to LR and convert to DNG: 58s vs 15s (!)
Export 10 full sized JPGs from RAWs: 74s vs 33s (!)
I was amazed by the Lightroom difference. I'm sure the SSD helped a bit, but the rendering times are amazingly better. I suspect the Nvidia GTX card helps a lot more than the AMD m290x, but I may do some more testing on that front. I double checked all of my settings as well. Anyway, all I know is it's a lot faster and that's very helpful.
I have no illusions that this will require a fair bit of maintenance, but I'm very comfortable with that. And....I have lots of backups!
Is anyone running a 480 without issues? Last I checked the sleep and tearing problems were making it not worth it but I just saw Apple updated Sierra which apparently helps fix some issues with the 460. Wondering if anyone's noticed improvements with the 480 as well.
I found this delid tool, seems a very safe way: http://rockitcool.myshopify.com/products/rockit-88
Video:
Video:
That does seem easy. I'm amazed that if such a little thing as better paste inside the CPU package can make such a big difference - as much if not more than adding water cooling, a giant heatsink, improving the airflow inside the case, etc - why doesn't Intel add it at the factory? It would make sense on the K series chips, would probably be a big selling point for enthusiasts, and would mean they could have higher stock clock speeds.
Because an Intel-bean counter wanted to separate professional CPU's from consumer CPU's. Since Skylake they don't solder consumer CPU's (which cost nevertheless $370).
Last edited:
Solder? I had to google that, from what I can gather solder is only necessary if you're going to be using sub-zero cooling. At normal temperatures liquid metal compounds like the Coollaboratory stuff seem to be acceptable.
There are other things to distinguish pro / consumer CPUs, aren't there? More cores, PCIe lanes, bigger cache, different type of RAM, etc. Do people even overclock the pro stuff? Still, I guess Intel must know what they're doing...
edit: So I read some more about it, because I'm very tempted to try, given the simplicity of that Rockit de-lidder. What I (think I) learned:
Solder is the absolute best thing to use, but it's difficult and requires plating the inside of the CPU heat spreader in order for it to bond correctly.
Liquid metal or similar gives much higher performance than the stuff Intel uses, but it degrades over time and will eventually need to be replaced.
The basic paste that Intel puts inside the heat spreader is cheap but lasts a long time. It degrades slightly over the first year or so but after that will give consistent performance for the life of the equipment.
Then there are people who de-lid the CPU and attach the cooler directly to the die, which is a whole other world of crazy...
Last edited:
So I built my i7 7700K-PC with the ASRock Fatal1ty board. My first PC built by myself, up and running (no overclocking). 
Geekbench 3 indicates 70% higher single core and 20% higher multi core results than Mac Pro with Xeon W3690.
Geekbench 4 indicates 80% higher single core and 30% higher multicore...
Installed Windows 7 and Windows 10, next OS X...
CPU temps: 33° Celsius idle, 50-60° 4K gaming, 85° stress testing
Geekbench 3 indicates 70% higher single core and 20% higher multi core results than Mac Pro with Xeon W3690.
Geekbench 4 indicates 80% higher single core and 30% higher multicore...
Installed Windows 7 and Windows 10, next OS X...
CPU temps: 33° Celsius idle, 50-60° 4K gaming, 85° stress testing
Last edited:
Very nice, and a sensible choice with the 980Ti. I just tried the same benchmark (older CPU, newer GPU) in Windows, got a slightly higher framerate but then I can't use the graphics card at all in Mac OS.
Yes, GTX 1080 is 30% faster than GTX 980 Ti, your benchmark matches with this comparison: http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-980-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1080/3439vs3603
But GTX 980 Ti is almost as fast as GTX 1070: http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-980-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1070/3439vs3609, and OS X compatible....
Here's a thread discussing whether or not it degrades. My understanding is that if applied correctly, it should last indefinitely.
Liquid Ultra Thermal Paste | TechPowerUp Forums
Don't need to join the effort just run the tests option is all that you need to do. Or as has been mentioned cue up some video in Handbrake with x265 as the encoder will do you the same 100% loading on all cores for the time they run to encode.
http://www.mersenne.org/download/