Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Do some USA businesses still use payment card imprinters?

View attachment 2435857
The answer is officially no. All the new-issue credit cards now no longer have the raised lettering that can be used by imprinters. They now print the credit card information on the back of the card and now use (mostly) EMV chip reading or tap-to-pay RFID to read the card information on the retailer's point of sale (POS) terminal.
 
I’m sorry to be that guy, but… that sentence doesn’t make sense.

Is Walmart now the only major retailer in the U.S. that still does not accept Apple Pay?

(No other major retailers — Walmart is now the only one.)

or

Does Walmart continue to be one of the only major retailers in the U.S. that still does not accept Apple Pay?

(There are major retailers that still do not accept Apple Pay. Walmart continues to be one such example.)
There are still a couple major retailers that don’t accept contactless payments. Hobby Lonby, Winco, and Graybars all don’t accept it. All of these have hundreds of stores.
 
If a store wants to give users the same experience for tapping both debit cards and credit cards, it can very well cost them more than simply not supporting tap at all (i.e. due to just running everything "as credit"). That's not really an Apple Pay specific thing, though.
My brain is having a hard time processing.

(First; i.e. Does not mean “in example”, the proper form would be e.g which means “example given”)

What I was saying in my post you quoted is this. E.g. You visit a merchant who accepts all types of payments. You use your credit card and swipe/chip/tap it, they are going to charge that merchant 3%. If you use a biometric locked wallet, the merchant is only charged 2%.

If you are a small store it probably wouldn’t mean much, but when you process hundreds and thousands of dollars a day, keeping that 1% is major increase over time.
 
What I was saying in my post you quoted is this. E.g. You visit a merchant who accepts all types of payments. You use your credit card and swipe/chip/tap it, they are going to charge that merchant 3%. If you use a biometric locked wallet, the merchant is only charged 2%.

If you are a small store it probably wouldn’t mean much, but when you process hundreds and thousands of dollars a day, keeping that 1% is major increase over time.

For in-person payments, it shouldn't matter whether someone taps or inserts in terms of how much the store pays.

That said, for (some) US based stores that can run debit cards over the "debit" networks (i.e. not Visa or Mastercard), there is a cost savings by getting as many transactions to be run as "debit" as possible. Unfortunately, this tends to mandate the use of PIN on top of Touch or Face ID. Because of this, many stores have tap always run over the credit card networks instead for a better user experience, which causes them to pay more than they otherwise would.

But yeah, I can totally see why most bigger stores would adopt a "wait and see" approach for contactless (if not be outright hostile to it) for cost reasons alone. Especially since contactless payment didn't even become commonly used by American consumers until COVID.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coolman13355
Is calling this 'Apple Pay' the right terminology? This is just tap to pay, no? Just one is using the NFC in a device (Watch or phone of any vendor), instead of on card, and then it works.
FWIW, I've been places where if you say "do you support NFC payments", they'll look at you all confused, but if you say, "do you support Apple Pay", they'll understand immediately. Lately, though, everywhere I've been, except for Home Depot, supports Apple Pay / NFC. I hardly ever take outt my wallet these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coolman13355
Is calling this 'Apple Pay' the right terminology? This is just tap to pay, no? Just one is using the NFC in a device (Watch or phone of any vendor), instead of on card, and then it works.
Apple people focus on themselves. Google Pay and Samsung Pay are also supported.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coolman13355
FWIW, I've been places where if you say "do you support NFC payments", they'll look at you all confused, but if you say, "do you support Apple Pay", they'll understand immediately. Lately, though, everywhere I've been, except for Home Depot, supports Apple Pay / NFC. I hardly ever take outt my wallet these days.
It also includes Google Pay and Samsung Pay. Apple Pay is not everyone, LOL.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: CarlJ
Is calling this 'Apple Pay' the right terminology? This is just tap to pay, no? Just one is using the NFC in a device (Watch or phone of any vendor), instead of on card, and then it works.
Right, Apple Pay came after Google Pay and Samsung Pay. Apple just copies all technologies, claim they made it better and/or easier to use. No they didn't. Just stop. Give credit where it's due.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: lpc2 and iPhilPHX
Right, Apple Pay came after Google Pay and Samsung Pay. Apple just copies all technologies, claim they made it better and/or easier to use. No they didn't. Just stop. Give credit where it's due.

A cursory search says otherwise. What’s your evidence supporting this claim?

… and Apple does have a history of letting others first forey into new territory and then enter once others have shown what not to do. Nothing wrong with that. The first mouse doesn’t get the cheese.
 
Right, Apple Pay came after Google Pay and Samsung Pay. ...

A cursory search says otherwise. What’s your evidence supporting this claim?
For the record, the technology behind it (NFC) was introduced on Android first, in late 2011 or so. Selected Android phones technically had NFC payment capabilities under the "Google Wallet" branding before Apple introduced Apple Pay -- but there were very few retailers (particularly in the US) who supported the technology at that time. Then Apple entered the fray in 2014, which (due to Apple's strong market influence) officially brought a large number of retailers onboard very quickly. Some other retailers had no idea what the heck was going on when their terminals started happily accepting NFC payments, due to the hardware they had just installed... which led to the whole thing with CurrentC and certain retailers shutting off NFC. In the meantime, Google Wallet had been rebranded to Android Pay and then was again rebranded to Google Pay at about the same time that Samsung Pay entered the market, which was about 2015.

So technically, it came to Android phones first... but not universally. Apple's entrance into the field effectively forced universal adoption.
 
PayPass trialed the world's first NFC-enabled phone, the Nokia 6131 NFC, in New York in 2007.
The trialing of the technology on a non-smartphone does indeed represent an interesting early iteration -- but in the context of this particular discussion (which predominantly revolves around Android and iOS) I would suggest that the relevance is... somewhat questionable. I mean, if you really wanted to harken back to the earliest instance of NFC, why not reference the Panasonic P506iC, from 2004, which was noted in the Nokia page you linked? But again, that would lack much relevance.

I still think the 2011 timeframe is more relevant, as even your linked Wiki article identifies that as a key milestone within the US.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
For the record, the technology behind it (NFC) was introduced on Android first, in late 2011 or so. Selected Android phones technically had NFC payment capabilities under the "Google Wallet" branding before Apple introduced Apple Pay -- but there were very few retailers (particularly in the US) who supported the technology at that time. Then Apple entered the fray in 2014, which (due to Apple's strong market influence) officially brought a large number of retailers onboard very quickly. Some other retailers had no idea what the heck was going on when their terminals started happily accepting NFC payments, due to the hardware they had just installed... which led to the whole thing with CurrentC and certain retailers shutting off NFC. In the meantime, Google Wallet had been rebranded to Android Pay and then was again rebranded to Google Pay at about the same time that Samsung Pay entered the market, which was about 2015.

So technically, it came to Android phones first... but not universally. Apple's entrance into the field effectively forced universal adoption.
But... aren't all these electronics companies doing just mirroring what a standalone card with the sideways wifi symbol, 'Tap to Pay' symbol does? NFC appeared on cards first before any electronic device. The terminal itself doesn't factor in whether it is a card, watch, or phone, just that a universally accepted NFC signal tied to a bank card can be accepted for payment.

https://usa.visa.com/pay-with-visa/...ontactless Cards,many of your favorite stores.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coolman13355
But... aren't all these electronics companies doing just mirroring what a standalone card with the sideways wifi symbol, 'Tap to Pay' symbol does? NFC appeared on cards first before any electronic device. The terminal itself doesn't factor in whether it is a card, watch, or phone, just that a universally accepted NFC signal tied to a bank card can be accepted for payment.

https://usa.visa.com/pay-with-visa/contactless-payments/contactless-payments.html#:~:text=Visa Contactless Cards,many of your favorite stores.
While you may be correct about standalone cards, I don't think that appreciably affects this discussion. Some sources suggest that the technology can be traced back to as early as WWII in 1945... but I still argue that those previous implementations lack any meaningful relevance to the specific topic at hand.

Whether we focus on passive NFC chips within credit cards and Hasbro toys or dynamic implementations in flip phones and smart phones, transforming NFC into the financial transaction standard that we know of today still started out as a chicken-and-egg issue: most retailers weren't interested in supporting it for lack of support from financial institutions, and most financial institutions weren't interested in supporting it for lack of support from retailers.

So while RFID and NFC technically existed previously, it remains true that Google still technically beat Apple to market with low volume implementation on select mobile devices and Apple's entrance into the field was still the breaking change which prompted both broader industry support and ongoing controversy... which is of course why this is a topic of such intense interest on MacRumors and other technology-centric websites.
 
Last edited:
According to Project Blue Book, we got it from a crashed alien spaceship.
I can certainly understand your tongue-in-cheek skepticism... but as strange as it seems, I actually do have a reference for that quip. My only point in mentioning it in the first place was to illustrate that "earliest instance" isn't necessarily the most important nor the most useful metric.
 
I can certainly understand your tongue-in-cheek skepticism... but as strange as it seems, I actually do have a reference for that quip. My only point in mentioning it in the first place was to illustrate that "earliest instance" isn't necessarily the most important nor the most useful metric.
Like frequency hopping, which was developed for military comms in WWII but didn't go mainstream until 3G and Wi-Fi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coolman13355
It also includes Google Pay and Samsung Pay. Apple Pay is not everyone, LOL.
I'm guessing you didn't read very carefully. Or maybe you're just in too much of a rush to show your knowledge. Try again.

As stated, I've had a number of times in the past where I asked in a store if they support "NFC payments" and they have no idea what that means, and then I ask if they support "Apple Pay" and they completely understand and say "yes".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.