Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

nj1266

macrumors 6502a
Jan 15, 2012
632
137
Long Beach, CA
Holy smokes! I just tested Purify and it's the best of the lot that I've used.

I went to many of the pages you listed and thus far, it loads pages faster than all the others and does a better job with the content of the page. I'm super impressed.

I'll keep messing with content blockers, but Purify will most likely be the main one I use. :)

In your opinion is it worth the 3.99 admission price over 0.99 for Crystal?
 

lewisd25

macrumors 6502a
Jul 6, 2007
851
591
What if... the dudes at Ghostery never imagined how well the app was going to sell and after all the hype of the last couple of days they decided to back off and stop licensing their database. They offered Marco to keep all the earning he made in those couple of days in exchange for the source code.

Maybe they will release an official Ghostery blocker in a few weeks.

Ding, ding. We have a winner!
 

scjr

macrumors 68020
Jan 28, 2013
2,196
1,340
In your opinion is it worth the 3.99 admission price over 0.99 for Crystal?

I prefer how Purify loads pages. It's faster and pages are handled better. I would choose Purify. Having said that, Crystal is great as well and it's 0.99 cents. I think these two are the best of the bunch thus far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt and nj1266

Jack426

macrumors regular
Jan 4, 2015
197
39
North Carolina
I'm noticing that some pages will not load at all. They show up as completely blank. I'm not sure if there is an easy way to disable it without having to go into settings?
Don't forget to report the website as "not working" in the Crystal App. I had the same issue viewing Vineyard Vines website yesterday, and after reporting, it loaded up fine today. The developer seems to be on top of any issues like this.
 

Rigby

macrumors 603
Aug 5, 2008
6,257
10,215
San Jose, CA
Newsweek

Fox News

The Verge

New York Times

Mac World

Yahoo

Just to name a few. It has been my experience, that as a whole, websites did not load as they should, compared to Crystal and Purify, even with the Media Blocker turned off.
Hm, I just tried NYTimes, Verge and Yahoo and they load just fine (at least the main page and one random link deeper). Perhaps you have multiple blockers active?
 

Rigby

macrumors 603
Aug 5, 2008
6,257
10,215
San Jose, CA
I just found this one that has stats: Adblock Mobile - https://appsto.re/us/2uU02.i
Careful: This one (and a number of other older blockers) does *not* use Apple's official API. They work by redirecting your traffic using a custom VPN or proxy profile. There are security and privacy risks.

It is not possible to collect stats about blocked sites using Apple's official content blocker mechanism, since this type of blocker never sees what you are doing in the browser.

Jeez, the marketing for Purify is really out of control ...
 

mpavilion

macrumors 65816
Aug 4, 2014
1,461
1,072
SFV, CA, USA
Do ad blockers actually stop ads from being served up to your device, and result in (recorded) lost "impressions" for the ad network – with financial implications your favorite websites?

Or do they just block ads from being displayed, but no one knows you're not seeing them (unless perhaps there's a measurable drop in people actually clicking on ads)?

Given the big ethical debate surrounding ad blockers, I assume it's the former – but I've never been clear on this.
 

inscrewtable

macrumors 68000
Oct 9, 2010
1,656
402
Blockr is great one too, Crystal kills the sidebar of feedly site, Blockr doesn't. It has white listing and also cookie warning blocking as well. I'm liking it so far.

blockr appears to be the only one that allow media blocking which is good when bandwidth is restricted like on the free train wifi.
 

Zirel

Suspended
Jul 24, 2015
2,196
3,008
Do ad blockers actually stop ads from being served up to your device, and result in (recorded) lost "impressions" for the ad network – with financial implications your favorite websites?

Or do they just block ads from being displayed, but no one knows you're not seeing them (unless perhaps there's a measurable drop in people actually clicking on ads)?

Given the big ethical debate surrounding ad blockers, I assume it's the former – but I've never been clear on this.

They block ads from being loaded at all. It's like the ad server is down.

They can do 2 things, and 2 things only: block loading, hide based on CSS tags.
 

dfgddikf

macrumors regular
Sep 10, 2015
130
62
Glad my mini review was of some help.

Whatever scripting he is using is definitely different than the others I have used thus far. I think the price of the app is way overinflated. That aside, I can't deny it stands out (right now) above the others.
These apps are all the same. Their only function is to feed a blocklist to Apples api. If there are minimal speed differences, it is because of the size of the blocklist.
 

DanEp

macrumors member
Jan 7, 2012
61
2
I downloaded AdMop to try out after having a good experience with Crystal. First thing I noticed was that to Update the AdMop Blocking Rules, you must:

Please log into iCloud to update the rules.

Why would they require such a thing? I wrote them with the question (not easy to find an email!) and have not yet heard back. The few reviews in the itunes store seem over the top glowingly positive.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.