Did you guys see already this video? So not only takes lot more power like I wrote in my previous thread, it's now confirmed it's noisier than before, go to 3:01, just noise 3:40, so frustrating
What the point of having the top of the line iMac having the worse sound levels. People buy the i7 to increase the usable lifetime of the iMac.
People buy the i7 because they either actually benefit from the power or because it's the best option and they just....have...to.....max.....
Yeah, pretty much this. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I got the i5 7600K / Radeon Pro 580 model. ETA Monday. Will be happy to report on the thermals.
The i7 model can trigger the fans with CPU load alone (see the video above -- looks like cinebench CPU is all that is running). From anecdotal internet reviews, previous i5 models haven't been able to trigger the fan with CPU alone.
Fingers crossed that all my coding (I do some intensive MATLAB) and photo editing will be done in silence, and only the occasional game I play will spin the fan at a moderate rpm...
His old iMac was a 3.2 GHz i5-6500 (Turbo to 3.6 GHz). It's not a fair comparison. A 4.5 GHz processor is hotter and noisier than 3.6 GHz processor.
If you want a machine that's quiet under heavy CPU load, don't get the i7.
Did you guys see already this video? So not only takes lot more power like I wrote in my previous thread, it's now confirmed it's noisier than before, go to 3:01, just noise 3:40, so frustrating
The i7 model can trigger the fans with CPU load alone (see the video above -- looks like cinebench CPU is all that is running). From anecdotal internet reviews, previous i5 models haven't been able to trigger the fan with CPU alone.
At any rate, when I get my iMac delivered soon, I'm curious to see just how noisy the thing gets when pushed. Wish I had both an i5 and i7 iMac side by side for comparison.
Wondering whether I should get i5 or i7. I do a lot of recordings with Screenflow; would be nice if the fan didn't kick on. (Im getting an SSD.) also do quite a bit of photography with LR and PS, so was leaning toward the 4.2 i7.
the i5 3.8+580 is running a lot cooler even in games than i7+580
Ambient temp around 24C, but the i5+580 never goes over 90C so the fans are remaining at 1200rpm-1300rpm max
but with the i7 i always get 95C after 1 min after starting the app, and the fans goes at 2100rpm and settle after that at around 1800rpm
the i5 3.8+580 is running a lot cooler even in games than i7+580
Ambient temp around 24C, but the i5+580 never goes over 90C so the fans are remaining at 1200rpm-1300rpm max
but with the i7 i always get 95C after 1 min after starting the app, and the fans goes at 2100rpm and settle after that at around 1800rpm
Wow so happy I ordered the i5the i5 3.8+580 is running a lot cooler even in games than i7+580
Ambient temp around 24C, but the i5+580 never goes over 90C so the fans are remaining at 1200rpm-1300rpm max
but with the i7 i always get 95C after 1 min after starting the app, and the fans goes at 2100rpm and settle after that at around 1800rpm
Yeah, pretty much this. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I got the i5 7600K / Radeon Pro 580 model. ETA Monday. Will be happy to report on the thermals.
The i7 model can trigger the fans with CPU load alone (see the video above -- looks like cinebench CPU is all that is running). From anecdotal internet reviews, previous i5 models haven't been able to trigger the fan with CPU alone.
Fingers crossed that all my coding (I do some intensive MATLAB) and photo editing will be done in silence, and only the occasional game I play will spin the fan at a moderate rpm...
I'm also interested in the i5 7600K 3.8Ghz noise level.
Are you on the i5 or i7? I plan on playing WoW and CS GO with my config. I ordered the i7 512 SSD 32 ram (OWC) not apple lol, and the 580. Should I be worried about the fan?I've had mine for 4 days so far. I haven't even heard the fan at all yet. I've done some 4k editing in FCP, as well as some heavy gaming in both OS X and Bootcamp.