Perhaps it does...but that does not excuse them from then trash-talking everyone else's use cases.
Yes, we're all different...but even so, when one gets into specific hardware solutions (eg, the new Mac Pro), the various Use Cases can get aggregated into various patterns and consequent issues. For example, the change in internal storage options has consequences for all use cases which rely on fast local storage and pedantially while TB does provide the capability, it does so at an appreciably higher cost, which clearly has an adverse effect on the Value metrics of the hardware.
We won't know how much of an issue this is for our personal Use Case until Apple announces the MSRP Retail Price and we are then able to run the numbers.
To notionally illustrate, for a Use Case that relies on ~4 internal 1TB HDDs, the price jump in third party solutions from 4x1TB internals to a Pegasus R4 with the same 4x1TB is roughly an extra $900, so unless the nMP costs $900 less than the current, there's an averse cost impact which - - at least for but this single metric - - results in a lesser product value.
Thank goodness for that.
True, but unfortunately, the dialog on MR has gotten far beyond merely 'enthusiastic': it has gotten so rude and downright unprofessional to the point where other possible motivations for it do have to be brought to bear as reasonable possibilities.
Classically, we do know that the action of purposefully "poisoning" discussions that aren't going favorably for a publicist has been a marketing strategy for decades, and there's a whole variety of logial fallacies and gambits which get used, which have utterly no place in a reasonable discussion or debate. The casualties are not only civility, but also objectivity.
-hh
